I think the term "close minded" comes into play here again. Basically your saying that any statistics and studies that show gays are normal are sponsored from the "pro-homosexual agenda"? Is the APA (American Psychiatric Association) a stooge of the "gay activists"? What about the American Psychological Association?
Concerning "reparative" or "conversion therapy" the president of the APA had this to say:
“There is no scientific evidence that reparative or conversion therapy is effective in changing a person’s sexual orientation. There is, however, evidence that this type of therapy can be destructive.”
Mind you this was after exhaustive study on the issue. How about some more famous psycholigist that came to the conclusion that homosexuality was a naturally occuring part of human nature. Does Jung or Sigmund Freud ring any bells? At what point do you conclude that these people may have some expertise and knowledge in a subject that you may not have? Or is everything that runs counter to your opinion "gay activists" and being manipulated by the "pro-homosexual agenda"?
