Message Boards

Replies to '06/06 "I'm Gay, OK?"'

 
User Mood
Excited

Message Emote
blank
October 21, 2005, 6:16 pm PDT

another misconstruction

Quote From: onthefarm

You argue that consent equals rightness. The analogies were to illustrate that mutual consent seemed to me to be a week argument for the rightness of homosexuality. I suppose I was hoping to press you to dig deeper ...probably hoping you would come up lacking and then agree with me! We do like people to think our way, don't we!
Are you doing this on purpose? I didn't claim anything. I asked a question. What is it about consensual sex that is so vile? To tell me that it compares with vile things is begging the question. That means it's just stating that it's vile because it's vile, which is no answer. The condition of consent is meant to rule out the evil of coercion. What evil then is left?
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
October 21, 2005, 6:21 pm PDT

Shame on you on the farm!

Quote From: onthefarm

You argue that consent equals rightness. The analogies were to illustrate that mutual consent seemed to me to be a week argument for the rightness of homosexuality. I suppose I was hoping to press you to dig deeper ...probably hoping you would come up lacking and then agree with me! We do like people to think our way, don't we!

You just stated to me in your post that both sides base their opinion on Scripture and thus it should be left up to the individual to decide! Then you go and 'dump' on someone because they believe differently than you and tell them they should "dig (a little) deeper" so that they can find the truth -- i.e. find the same 'truth' that you see. Shame! Shame! So much for 'both sides have equal validity'...  

 


Return to the Message Board


First Page | Previous Page | 1 | Next Page | Last Page