|
December 5, 2008, 2:57 pm PST
The Problem of Full Inclusion
Quote From: inthenestONLY IN AMERICA!!!! I think that the teachers handled the situation of the violent student with autism in an ideal fashion. Children, whether they are autistic, preschoolers or 'normal' older children, need consistent, firm consequences to violent, out of control behaviour. The fact that Isabelle is disabled and is an older child underscores the urgent need to get this child on the right track, otherwise she could hurt other children in the classroom, the teachers whom she was attacking and even herself. She was given a chance to cooperate. She had a break for lunch. It was not 3 uninterrupted hours but likely more like 1 hour. Granted, she could have been brought back into the classroom sooner than that such as 15 minutes. My guess would be that these parents are not disciplining Isabelle at home and that is why she is so violent at school and has a problem with authority as Dr Phil stated. The fact that these parents are so up in arms over this issue indicates also that they are not firm parents. Generally discipline in the USA is inadequate which accounts for all the wild teens in your country.
Federal legislators, few of whom have ever been trained as educators, have deemed that all disabled children be educated in a "regular" classroom with non-disabled peers. Clearly, severely autistic or even retarded (which only means "slowed down" and is not a profane expression) require more support and structure than one teacher and an aide in a class or 25+ children can offer. Thus, the concept of "time-out" is almost the only option available to the teacher, who is also being judged by how many of her/his students pass criterion referenced or standardized tests. Thus, removing the child is an option. All suggestions of teaching the child "socialization" skills are really good; but, they cannot be taught at the expense of the other children in the room. For that reason, special education classes were "created" and were wonderful for children encountering difficulties in coping. Unfortunately, parents and their advocates felt special ed. was a mark against kids and thus, the idea of full inclusion is now the newest "innovation." Though known as a pessimist, I predict special ed. will one day soon be seen as the most intelligent way to begin. Although I am left-handed, clumsy, and most unskilled in cutting (my teachers tried to get me to become right-handed,) I wanted to be a brain surgeon. However, I still can't cut a straight line. So, I looked at what I could do well, majored in that area, and left the surgery to those with great fine motor skills. My parents didn't sue anyone; in fact, they were darn glad that they would never have to face the possibility of my doing surgery on them. So, parents, get over it; some children do better being taught in those areas that will help them cope with life and its challenges!!!!!
|