Message Boards

Replies to '12/27 Extreme Parenting'

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
chillin'
October 27, 2005, 4:59 pm PDT

Winners never quit, quitters never win

Quote From: bang70

  

When Dr. Phil asked Mom, "lose the money or lose the money & scar the child", she had a pause.   

  

Let's pose a simple question: 

  

"Mom, if he got injured for the remainder of the season, would you lose the money?" 

  

Of course. 

  

Then what's the difference between losing the money because it's the right thing to do or because he gets injured? 

  

There are things worse than losing the money. 

___________________________________________ 

  

Kid driving fast. 

  

"We weren't being reckless, we were just driving fast." 

  

Talk about sophistry. 

  

Driving fast isn't being reckless? 

  

I've got news for him.  When (not if) they get stopped by the cops, a speeding ticket isn't the only thing thing the driver will get.  Reckless driving will be included and probably any number of other things.  The driver will likely find himself arrested as well - particularly if he is a teen and needs a "scared straight" situation. 

  

When I was his age, I was volunteering on the back of the ambulance and not long after, sought permission to get a license as an EMT before I was 18 (the standard age).  I had no problems following the rules & laws of the road when I was his age, particularly because I saw the aftereffects of people driving like idiots. 

  

Dear Dad: 

  

Congrats!  He should drive the same, regardless of whether the chip was there [or not or whether he knew it was there [or not.   

  

Now, we just have to find out if they had seatbelts on.  Any time you hear, "was ejected from the vehicle", odds are, the seatbelt wasn't on.  Yes, there are exceptions someone will cite when wearing a seatbelt might cause harm, but if you're looking at the "Lottery of Life", you'll have more wins than losses if you wear that belt. 

  

"ClickIt or Ticket"?  I think it's wrong.  Make it a business decision.  Encourage the insurance companies to add one clause to the policies:  we will not cover anyone who didn't have their seatbelts on. 

  

Here in Indiana, one father (of an adult woman - later twenties, not teens) pled the Legislature to enact a law for pickup trucks to have a seatbelt law as well because his daughter would be alive if there was a law.  I thought, "What an idiot!"  You can't wear a seatbelt unless there's a law?"  She chose not to wear a seatbelt, regardless of whether there's a law [or not. 

  

I'm comfortable in a seatbelt, and even when I drop someone off who will, let's say, be in a store for a little while, then come back out, I generally don't take the seatbelt off. It's not for a safety reason, it's just comfortable and it doesn't bother me to wear it. 

  

Revoke the laws of mandatory wearing and let Darwin take over. 

What are you teaching a child if you let them quit in the middle of a season?  Are we teaching them to be quitters?  Is it really OK to quit and leave your team mates in a possible lerch just because you "don't want to do it anymore"?  I think not.  For those of you with kids in competitive cheerleading, you know what I'm talking about.  Competitive cheerleading is a true TEAM sport.  It isn't like football or baseball where if you lose one person, there's another one on the bench to take his/her place.  Each individual is part of a pyramid or a stunt that requires his/her presence.  To take that child away in the middle of the competition season could mean the difference between a winning and a losing season.   

  

To the mom of the cheerleading son:  If he wants to quit, then let him....but make him wait until the end of the season.  Teach him to follow through with his commitments.  However, it's not about the money, it's about the lesson learned.  Winners never quit and quitters never win. 

 


Return to the Message Board


First Page | Previous Page | 1 | Next Page | Last Page