Quote From: speggaryWake up!! It's Aileen's land, her money, and her decision. Having greedy, disrespectful children can't be fun, and there's no reason she should reward them with any degree of respect until it is earned.
Ok yet again....
If you kindly read my post... I mentioned NOTHING of land or inheritance. That s her land and if wants to take it with her when she goes.. she can go right ahead. They have no say.
I was SIMPLY speaking of ADVANCE DIRECTIVES. The mere fact that she is refusing to let her daughter (I notice how Im leaving the grandaughter out. She is just way too nosey!) have knowledge of the advance directives states to an experienced Geriatric Healthcare provider, such as myself, that she is a controlling woman. She didnt have to speak a word, or bat those pretty eyelashes for me to notice.
For those of you that don't know: ADVANCE DIRECTIVES ARE MEANT TO BE DISCUSSED WITH YOUR LOVED ONES. If you dont believe me then take a look back on the Sciavo case. We should all have these directves and should be shared with family. The lawyer is simply being irresponsible. Just because it is your right to keep the advance directives private doesnt mean she should. Her daughter should have a clear idea of what her mom's last wishes are for her care, life, pain managment, heroic measures and death. That is just common sense.
Obviously, the daughter should learn a better method in addressing her mom.
