Replies to 'Gay Marriage Debate'

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
October 18, 2005, 12:57 pm PDT

Gay Marriage Debate

Quote From: slipunder

There is a big problem here because everyone is saying yes or no but nobody is defining marriage. Counties, states, countries all have definitions, plus there are civil and religious marriages, plus there are long term committed relationships that don’t have to even come close to any of those definitions. A religious institution can deny marriage to anyone for any reason they want presumably because it doesn’t benefit their group or goal. So by that what does a government have to gain by making all sorts of marriage legal? There are already laws to protect property, minor custody and all that and maybe they should be making existing laws better of have them applied more consistently? Maybe insurance laws and medical coverage and social security benefits should be improved anyway regardless of who is applying for them? 

since when did protecting a concept of an institution take presidence over the rights of an individual or rights of the minority. the reason the massachussetts supreme court allowed for gay marriage was because the dissenting side could offer any evidence why gay marriage should not be allowed. you can bet that the core of their argument centered around tradition. tradition vs civil rights
 


Return to the Message Board


First Page | Previous Page | 1 | Next Page | Last Page