Quote From: tkimballI'm sorry, I know this is not the politically correct thing to say, but I have to admit that I get so tired of hearing about stay-at-home (SAH) moms who are so darned exhausted at having every day off to clean the house and take care of their families. Sorry, but Diana's got a babysitter?? And she can't pick up the Cheerios?  
 
I'm not saying that Ken is handling his feelings right, or that's he justified in EVERYTHING he's saying, and I've never realized my own feelings about this subject until the last few similar shows like this on Dr. Phil, but come on. I'm sorry, but I work full-time, travel an hour to and an hour back home every day, have a teenager and a toddler, volunteer as an EMT (& am the training officer) with my local rescue unit, and serve on a public committee for the town I live in. AND I'm pregnant with child #3! And I still manage to raise my kids - including coaching my son's baseball team (at 6-months pregnant), manage my house, and cook and clean. No, the house isn't spotless EVERY day, but if I had EVERY day off, it darn-well would be. 
 
I know there's a big debate on how much work a SAH mom does, and I'm definitely (absolutely) not saying that all SAH moms aren't doing a good job or aren't doing enough, I guess I'm just lost at how overwhelmed some SAH moms seem to be (like Diana) when they don't really seem to be making the most of their time and managing their houses/families. I think Ken isn't getting a very fair rap with this whole thing. He hired a cleaning company? I'll take it! Sorry, I'm just not having a very easy time painting Ken as the bad guy here and Diana as the victim. 
And perhaps letting it color your opinion about the show? You are doing a lot - is the father of your children around to help? Sounds like he's a couch potato, happy to see his wife running around like a chicken with it's head cut off - working, commuting, cleaning, cooking, coaching, volunteering, gestating, etc.
Stay at home moms DON'T have every day off. They are WORKING at home where the constant mess is. They don't get vacation or sick days. If they could ship their kids off somewhere for the day and stay home, then that would be a day off. (P.S. Diana posted that the babysitter was so she could work on her husband's business, not so she could have a day off.)
And I could say to you, why are you having more children if you can't afford it without working? Why are you having more children if you are passing them off to someone else to raise while you work? But, of course, that is your decision and I'm sure it was well thought out.
While raising my children, I watched with envy while my sister-in-law worked at a high profile job and employed a nanny/housekeeper to raise her children. She spaced her children 4 years apart so that it was convenient for her career. She had nice clothes, a nice vehicle, adult companionship, a large salary, fancy lunches, world travel, kudos for her achievements, etc., and could leave her job each day and come home to a clean house, dinner on the table, and children expressing how much they missed her.
But as the years went by, I realized that wasn't for me. Her children absorbed and adopted every aspect of their nanny's ethnicity from language to behaviour to food (not a bad thing but not great for a homogeneous family unit); her children began to cry more when the nanny left than when she did; her children, given the choice, sought comfort from the nanny instead of their mother; her children's milestones (first word, first walk, etc.) were experienced on videotape. Now that they are teenagers, her children have "issues" and are very distant from her AND ALSO each other (because they were born so conveniently far apart maybe?). Now I don't feel envious any more about choosing my children over a career, money and prestige.