I took your points a bit farther. My basic point, and the one where we're in agreement, as best I can see, is that giving rights and/or responsibilities based solely on sex, as so many posting to this
topic are doing, is pure *sexism*. Men should have equal legal rights to say " no ". Women already
have all those rights, and those who defend that misandrous sexism only display their
WomenFirster Bigotry. Those who believe that men are people, too, and thus, deserve real and
equal rights, would do well to Google " Choice For Men ", aka " C4M ".
Imagine if we reversed matters: so that men could enforce their choices on women. Women would
SO scream, and they'd be as right as Matt is, for having been *forced* into a situation that NO woman faces. Shame on all those who diss Matt, and the millions of similarly forced men.
" Her body, her choice... HER *responsibility* ! "
