Message Boards

Replies to '07/06 Baby Wars'

 
User Mood
Depressed

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 2:00 pm PDT

your way off

Quote From: dilea0139

If he really believes what he says then it goes both ways...he does not have the right to tell her what to do with the child. He had sex with her and if you play you have to accept the consequences no matter what you are doing. Birth control has been proven not to be 100% and he knew that going in. How dare him try to get out of his responsibility by trying to plead ignorance. I am sure he enjoyed participating but now he doesn't want to accept the outcome. That is the problem with kids now a days, they don't take any responsibility for their actions. 
he is not trying to tell her what she should do, SHE is the one telling him what he should do, and our government automatically sides with the mother, because the poor mother is a victim here.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 2:07 pm PDT

not man enuf to take responsibility for his actions

Quote From: dilea0139

If he really believes what he says then it goes both ways...he does not have the right to tell her what to do with the child. He had sex with her and if you play you have to accept the consequences no matter what you are doing. Birth control has been proven not to be 100% and he knew that going in. How dare him try to get out of his responsibility by trying to plead ignorance. I am sure he enjoyed participating but now he doesn't want to accept the outcome. That is the problem with kids now a days, they don't take any responsibility for their actions. 

I can hardly express my anger for his arrogance.  I could write VOLUMES about this but let's look at it in a different context: 

  

When did society accept that we no longer have to take responsibility for our actions? 

  

If he were drinking and enjoying himself and got in the car and killed someone, would he be held responsible?  YES!  But wait, he didn't begin drinking with the INTENT of killing someone - he only wanted to have a good time.  So by his definition, he shouldn't be held responsible!  He had consensual sex WITHOUT the intent of creating life - yet it happened.  According to him, he should not be held accountable for the result of his pleasure.  HOW is that any different from taking a life? 

  

A virtue is a virtue is a virtue.  He has NONE.  What a slug and same goes for the 2 sitting next to him. 

 


Return to the Message Board


First Page | Previous Page | 1 | Next Page | Last Page