For one I hate to be the one to break it to you but it doesnt take a lot of convincing for a guy to not use protection. You make it sound like she made this big presentaion about her condition. Which I am sure didnt happen. Second of all I seriousy doubt the conversation they had about having kids didnt take more than 5 minuets. And thats with kissing inbetween words. I also think that it is not the girls right to have child support. It is the CHILDS right. That child no matter how it came into the world has a right to support even if the father decided that he dont want that child. Do you have kids? Because I have 5 and one of them is my step daughter and one is a daughter that I had previous to my marriage. Are all you people saying that if my husband chose to leave me then he could just go and not be held responsible for the children that we have? That all he would have to say is that he didnt want them in the first place? Cause if Matt wins this that is what this is all going to come down to. If you have sex then you have to pay the consequences. And Matt had sex no matter what she said WITHOUT protection. If he was that against having kids then he should have protected himself. Helpless and Pathetic??? Thats exactly how he is acting.
I feel the same way. If you don't want to be responsible for a child then don't have sex!
