Replies to '05/29 Parenting Dilemmas'

I really don't see the relevance of what you are saying here.

All I was doing was making it clear that if a business doesn't want tattooed individuals to work for them they have a legal right to do so.

I have no clue what you are talking about, with out of wedlock baby's and drug addicts...your argument makes no sense. I'm talking about a company decided to discriminate against people for marking up their bodies and changing their appearance voluntarily. 

No, body art doesn't change who you are, but it's still a choice so it doesn't deserve protection under the law. You didn't have to get a tattoo.

Also, I don't know anything about the military. Since every person I have ever known in the military has several tattoos...I can't imagine what you are talking about.

You seem very angry. I personally don't care if people have tattoos. I wouldn't have one myself. I don't like them. But I also don't like certain hair cuts or certain kinds of clothes. Doesn't mean I hate the people who do have them. Whatever...live and let live.

And yes it does come down to the "almighty buck" because THAT is why people start businesses...LOL

I'm trying to make it clear that if a company doesn't want people who have marked up their bodies working for them then they have that right. That's it.