Replies to '12/22 Custody Battles Gone Bad'

Custody battles usually occur between those who DO NOT care about the children, in  most cases, and is furthered by attorneys and judges that listen to the side with the most money or who is friends with the judge. 

Try having your children taken away from their mother who had sole custody for four years.  The father had more important things to do than be a father and took limited visitation.  However, as soon as he found a woman to marry with a lot of money that wanted to get custody of the two children in order to maintain control over him, they filed for custody.  Money is more important to him than the happiness of his children. 

Was custody taken away from a bad mother and given to a good father?  Quite the contrary.  The official reason was because "the mother was either directly or indirectly trying to alienate the children from their father".  Of course there was absolutely no documentation, no proof, no testimony, but the judge is friends with the father's wife's and her attorney.  In small towns, money talks and justice was not served.  The boys hate their father and his new wife for having been ripped from their mother.  There visitation as been reduced to one weekend a month.  Therapists involved testified that it would be detrimental to the children but no one would listen and the judge does not care.

The damage to these children will last their lifetime.  The sad part about it is that the judge could have taken into consideration the damage she was causing and stopped it. 

Custody battles usually occur between those who DO NOT care about the children, in  most cases, and is furthered by attorneys and judges that listen to the side with the most money or who is friends with the judge. 

Try having your children taken away from their mother who had sole custody for four years.  The father had more important things to do than be a father and took limited visitation.  However, as soon as he found a woman to marry with a lot of money that wanted to get custody of the two children in order to maintain control over him, they filed for custody.  Money is more important to him than the happiness of his children. 

Was custody taken away from a bad mother and given to a good father?  Quite the contrary.  The official reason was because "the mother was either directly or indirectly trying to alienate the children from their father".  Of course there was absolutely no documentation, no proof, no testimony, but the judge is friends with the father's wife's and her attorney.  In small towns, money talks and justice was not served.  The boys hate their father and his new wife for having been ripped from their mother.  There visitation as been reduced to one weekend a month.  Therapists involved testified that it would be detrimental to the children but no one would listen and the judge does not care.

The damage to these children will last their lifetime.  The sad part about it is that the judge could have taken into consideration the damage she was causing and stopped it. 

Custody battles usually occur between those who DO NOT care about the children, in  most cases, and is furthered by attorneys and judges that listen to the side with the most money or who is friends with the judge. 

Try having your children taken away from their mother who had sole custody for four years.  The father had more important things to do than be a father and took limited visitation.  However, as soon as he found a woman to marry with a lot of money that wanted to get custody of the two children in order to maintain control over him, they filed for custody.  Money is more important to him than the happiness of his children. 

Was custody taken away from a bad mother and given to a good father?  Quite the contrary.  The official reason was because "the mother was either directly or indirectly trying to alienate the children from their father".  Of course there was absolutely no documentation, no proof, no testimony, but the judge is friends with the father's wife's and her attorney.  In small towns, money talks and justice was not served.  The boys hate their father and his new wife for having been ripped from their mother.  There visitation as been reduced to one weekend a month.  Therapists involved testified that it would be detrimental to the children but no one would listen and the judge does not care.

The damage to these children will last their lifetime.  The sad part about it is that the judge could have taken into consideration the damage she was causing and stopped it.