Message Boards
Replies to '11/24 Great School Debate'
|
November 21, 2006, 11:33 am PST
 Quote From: fredastare While I can agree that governments are subject to error. I don't not feel that the laws are "silly" at all. Certainly there is a need for revaluation and improvement within the public school system.
I didn't realize that Private Schools are excluded from govt. intervention. Again, that is a mistake IMO.
The government likely doesn't know whats best for any child.......yet they must protect all children and their rights is what I'm saying.
What if the government began monitoring all parental activity for the "best interests of the child" would you agree?
I would agree.
As far as the whole Foster Care scenario you implied about, I can't see that happening. Yet I am grateful that there are laws and agencies in place (albeit not perfect ) in order to protect children.
I do not feel that there is a poster on this board that isn't fully competent in raising their children in an extraordinary fashion. My point is that I feel strongly that there must be some form of accountability and standards that access the quality of education every child receives.
In a democracy it is up to the government to ensure the highest quality of education for our children. Particularly ensuring that *some* parents that do not have the children's best interests at heart aren't able to abuse a child.
I hope that you can better understand my point of view. I am not against homeschooling, I am only concerned for the rights of the children.
Fredi
What if the government began monitoring all parental activity for the "best interests of the child" would you agree?
I would agree.
Wow, I am surprised. I'm not trying to question your decision but allow me to ask a few questions. You would actually be okay with a government agency entering each home in America that contains children, reviewing all parental decisions and deciding if they up to state standards?
As far as the whole Foster Care scenario you implied about, I can't see that happening. Yet I am grateful that there are laws and agencies in place (albeit not perfect ) in order to protect children.
See, I gave the foster care scenario because IMO it is the equivalent of what is being proposed for homeschoolers. I agree with you that our society needs to have laws and agencies in place to protect children. However, these laws must be balanced and not intrude on all privacy. IMO, it would be absurd to allow the foster care agency to enter every home in America, review all parenting decisions and rule as to whether that decisions were according to the state's standards. Sure, we would catch a few bad apples but would it be worth intruding on the privacy of everyone else?
Perhaps I don't agree because I believe strongly in personal accountability. IMO, alot of people count on the government to do things which are not needed. I believe in taking responsibility for our own actions and not expecting the government to do it for us. Does that make sense?
The silly laws I am referring to are laws such as the no child left behind. I have heard many educators explain why it does not work and why it actually hinders the education. What is your take on it?
In a democracy it is up to the government to ensure the highest quality of education for our children.
Not trying to be snarky but don't you think the government should fix the government schools before they begin working on other schools?
I do understand your point of view and I appreciate the fact that we have been able to communicate effectively. I understand and agree with your feelings of protecting our children. But homeschooling has been proven to work time and time again. The vast majority of homeschoolers are doing a terrific job. It would be a pitty to scrutinize a group because of a slim few who are not doing well. KWIM?
|
|
Return to the Message Board
