Message Boards

Replies to '11/24 Great School Debate'

 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
December 5, 2006, 1:08 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: jettav

I personally feel that a child should be reading way before 10, regardless of how they are schooled, I know quite a few older kids  who cannot read and I find it quite sad. I have worked with kids who can barely sound out a word, why is it that it isn't imporant to start teaching kids to read at any early age? I really do not understand that. I love watching my 5 year old read, it amazes me that she has only  been in this world going on 6 years and she was able to learn this skill as well as my soon to 4 year old is doing well. They absolutely love books and their favorite pass time is to go to the library to pick out their favorite books and the excitement on my 5 year olds face and attitude because she can read a book on her own is awesome. I encourage all parents to start their kids young at reading, I feel reading is one of the most imporant things that a person should know and I feel the sooner the better, get tthem into the fun of reading at an early age. 10 just seems too old not to be able to read and it deosn't have to be forced, just encouraged and most will get it.
In general, I believe most children should be reading or at least have a bit of a grasp of the reading and written word (i.e they should be headed in that general direction) by 10... however, it's important to be aware that there's really no point at which it's too late to catch on (for - assuming - healthy children).   

Don't forget how averages are calculated, either.

When someone says "The average age of a child who reads is 5 or 6 or so" they take "average" to mean "the most acceptable sign of normal".  Unfortunate how the two words have grown over the years to be synonymous, when average is simply the result someone got by dividing the total sum of the answers by the number of participants. 

Hypothetical case, for instance, you could take 4 people who learned to read at the age of 3, and 4 people who learned at the age of 8, and take the average 52/8, and get 6.5 - none of the participants in this hypothetical case were actually 6.5 years old when they learned to read... that's just the average.



 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
December 5, 2006, 1:22 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: jettav

I personally feel that a child should be reading way before 10, regardless of how they are schooled, I know quite a few older kids  who cannot read and I find it quite sad. I have worked with kids who can barely sound out a word, why is it that it isn't imporant to start teaching kids to read at any early age? I really do not understand that. I love watching my 5 year old read, it amazes me that she has only  been in this world going on 6 years and she was able to learn this skill as well as my soon to 4 year old is doing well. They absolutely love books and their favorite pass time is to go to the library to pick out their favorite books and the excitement on my 5 year olds face and attitude because she can read a book on her own is awesome. I encourage all parents to start their kids young at reading, I feel reading is one of the most imporant things that a person should know and I feel the sooner the better, get tthem into the fun of reading at an early age. 10 just seems too old not to be able to read and it deosn't have to be forced, just encouraged and most will get it.

I somewhat agree, but this is the part of the picture you are not seeing:

 

The majority of kids "get it" but not all kids are alike.  They have different learning styles.  Therefore, they have different learning needs.  All needs cannot be met by the school so the curriculum that is used by the school is what works for the majority.  Often, the minority slip through cracks or just fake their way through until it finally *clicks* and they get it.

 

That is why a child who's been in school everyday with his peers, getting the same schooling as his peers) may not be reading on the level as his peers

 

I think that the president's "No Child Left Behind" is a bunch of bull.  Until they can separate the kids, they cannot properly teach to ALL kids because all kids are not the same.

 

 

 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
December 5, 2006, 2:23 pm PST

Reading

Quote From: jettav

I personally feel that a child should be reading way before 10, regardless of how they are schooled, I know quite a few older kids  who cannot read and I find it quite sad. I have worked with kids who can barely sound out a word, why is it that it isn't imporant to start teaching kids to read at any early age? I really do not understand that. I love watching my 5 year old read, it amazes me that she has only  been in this world going on 6 years and she was able to learn this skill as well as my soon to 4 year old is doing well. They absolutely love books and their favorite pass time is to go to the library to pick out their favorite books and the excitement on my 5 year olds face and attitude because she can read a book on her own is awesome. I encourage all parents to start their kids young at reading, I feel reading is one of the most imporant things that a person should know and I feel the sooner the better, get tthem into the fun of reading at an early age. 10 just seems too old not to be able to read and it deosn't have to be forced, just encouraged and most will get it.

I also meant to say this:  Even when a kid doesn't learn at 6, you cannot tell it later on.  Most schools use a method that leaves a kid still sounding-out words and reading very choppy-sounding at age 9 or later.  Some kids struggle to sound-out words at age 12. 

 

The method we use has the child reading fluidly right away.  Overall, the method we use takes longer so if you don't start until age 5, the child may not reading until age 7. 

 


Return to the Message Board


First Page | Previous Page | 1 | Next Page | Last Page