Replies to '09/15 The Disappearance of Natalee'

Pff, you're making way too long text to read it all, so i'm just reacting on your last post.
Maybe you could try to put your texts in little pieces? That's much better to read and 

allows you to put forward your statement better. The trick for that is to make a text start and 

end with the thing you want to get across. In between you can put arguments to underline  

your statement. So you get: statement - arguments - statement. And then another little piece 

of text. Sorry, this is kind of a habit of mine: editing texts. So, i hope you won't feel offended. 

I only mean this as a little help :) 

Anyway, back on-topic.
What I'd like to say first, is that ìf Joran has done something wrong, he must be held responsable 

for that. But, and i've said so already in a previous message: do not convict him before there is any 

evidence. I think judges are quite capable of figuring out if he's guilty or not. That's why they have that job.
Second: the person quoted most in this article is Beth Holloway Twitty. With all respect for her 

grief, but you can hardly call her impartial in this case. I do fully understand her need to find out 

wath has happened to her daughter and who has done it, but she is playing judge here and i do 

not think that's right. 

Third: how old are the guys that are accused? 18,19? Something like that. I cannot remember right now. They are mere boys. I am not saying it's a good thing, but scared kids might resolve to lying. 

It's not okay, but it happens.