Message Boards

Replies to '12/26 The Nanny Affair, Part 1'

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
frustrated
September 9, 2007, 12:53 pm PDT

Don't judge.

Quote From: j2b3o1

 AMEN! I'm not saying he was right........or wrong......but what about this nanny? Doesn't she have any ownership in this as well?? I am quite positive she was not a LITTLE GIRL.......she was old enough to drive......and KNEW that Amy & Brandon were married. She watched their children for god's sakes! She is just as GUILTY as Brandon and as far as I'm concerned.......if you are going to smear his name all over the boards, smear hers too.
I don't think that other women should never be bashed at all. The husband is the one that should be bashed, after all, he is the one who is married. And what if the Nanny was under 18? Perhaps he was bribing her in someway to have sex with her. Don't bring any judgments on her, or OW who may be involved as well. They are just trying to look for love, but looking for love in the wrong person. I'm a single man at 25 years of age, & I know these things. Don't judge others, unless you want to be judged, too.
 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
September 9, 2007, 2:38 pm PDT

Thank you

Quote From: j2b3o1

 AMEN! I'm not saying he was right........or wrong......but what about this nanny? Doesn't she have any ownership in this as well?? I am quite positive she was not a LITTLE GIRL.......she was old enough to drive......and KNEW that Amy & Brandon were married. She watched their children for god's sakes! She is just as GUILTY as Brandon and as far as I'm concerned.......if you are going to smear his name all over the boards, smear hers too.
Finally, a person of true reason.

Thank you
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
September 12, 2007, 8:22 pm PDT

Power, age differentials, possible drugging

Quote From: j2b3o1

 AMEN! I'm not saying he was right........or wrong......but what about this nanny? Doesn't she have any ownership in this as well?? I am quite positive she was not a LITTLE GIRL.......she was old enough to drive......and KNEW that Amy & Brandon were married. She watched their children for god's sakes! She is just as GUILTY as Brandon and as far as I'm concerned.......if you are going to smear his name all over the boards, smear hers too.

The nanny was in a subordinate role to the husband who was an employer by definition.  If he was inducing/seducing her with pain meds and flirtatious interaction:

1.) as a father he should know the nanny was a poor influence/caretaker of his children if she had a drug problem/interest in recreational drug abuse;

2.) he would be guilty of violating Federal controlled substances laws and contributing to the delinquency of a young person;

3.) his actions as a boss/superior with someone of such inexperience in the work world would be considered harrassment at least, and sexual exploitation of an employee.  It is a form of coercion to be in the employ of someone who is abusing you, and confusing for a young person who is inexperienced in both sex and workplace politics.  When a girl is that age, she is concerned about being accepted/liked and performing her job.

 

Bottom line, he is a predator of everyone around him.  Yes, the babysitter's behavior was immature and misguided, but that is what makes him even more culpable, as the adult and BOSS he should have had the better judgement.  It sounds like he was encouraging and playing along with the flirting because he is in love with a warped idea of himself and what sex is about.

 

BTW, DRIVING does not equate to MATURITY, this case is proof...

 


Return to the Message Board


First Page | Previous Page | 1 | Next Page | Last Page