Home Message Boards

Replies to '07/02 The O.J. Book Battle'

 
jannypa

Message Emote
blank
October 11, 2007, 9:33 am PDT

But he is NOT innocent

Quote From: emilec132

I think it is tragec how people presume that OJ is guilty.  After all, he was aquitted in the criminal trial.  Everyone assumes that OJ went there to kill his wife and that poor Ron Goldman happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.  I think that Ron was the intended victim and that OJ's wife opened the door at the wrong time.  I think it was a drug related killing.  Wasn't Ron's roommate, also, killed just shortly afterward?  Food for thought people.  How could OJ have committed such a bloody crime and not be covered in blood himself?  In the civil trial no one had to prove that he really committed the crime, only that he could have.  A lot of innocent victims are in prison today because no one had to prove that they were guilty.
You wonder why he wasn't covered in blood....he brought different dark clothing...Nicole's and Ron's blood was found in the Bronco and in his shower...The reason he was acquitted was because by playing the race card, the jury IGNORED the mountains of evidence pointing to only one killer, OJ Simpson...I'm sure if they had an actual video of the killing, that ignorant jury still would have acquitted him!
 
Reply with Quote Read Replies to this Message
skipsrainbows
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
October 13, 2007, 11:22 am PDT

then you are the only one still clueless

Quote From: emilec132

I think it is tragec how people presume that OJ is guilty.  After all, he was aquitted in the criminal trial.  Everyone assumes that OJ went there to kill his wife and that poor Ron Goldman happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.  I think that Ron was the intended victim and that OJ's wife opened the door at the wrong time.  I think it was a drug related killing.  Wasn't Ron's roommate, also, killed just shortly afterward?  Food for thought people.  How could OJ have committed such a bloody crime and not be covered in blood himself?  In the civil trial no one had to prove that he really committed the crime, only that he could have.  A lot of innocent victims are in prison today because no one had to prove that they were guilty.
 
Reply with Quote Read Replies to this Message
hodges10329
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
angry
October 13, 2007, 5:45 pm PDT

OH Please!!!

Quote From: emilec132

I think it is tragec how people presume that OJ is guilty.  After all, he was aquitted in the criminal trial.  Everyone assumes that OJ went there to kill his wife and that poor Ron Goldman happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.  I think that Ron was the intended victim and that OJ's wife opened the door at the wrong time.  I think it was a drug related killing.  Wasn't Ron's roommate, also, killed just shortly afterward?  Food for thought people.  How could OJ have committed such a bloody crime and not be covered in blood himself?  In the civil trial no one had to prove that he really committed the crime, only that he could have.  A lot of innocent victims are in prison today because no one had to prove that they were guilty.

Anyone who watched that court proceedings on TV would have seen that OJ was guilty as sin! I think that the fact that he was acquitted only proves that if you throw enough money at the law you can get away with murder!!!!!
 
Reply with Quote Read Replies to this Message
fromthesquare
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
October 14, 2007, 4:27 am PDT

ARE YOU OJ?

Quote From: emilec132

I think it is tragec how people presume that OJ is guilty.  After all, he was aquitted in the criminal trial.  Everyone assumes that OJ went there to kill his wife and that poor Ron Goldman happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.  I think that Ron was the intended victim and that OJ's wife opened the door at the wrong time.  I think it was a drug related killing.  Wasn't Ron's roommate, also, killed just shortly afterward?  Food for thought people.  How could OJ have committed such a bloody crime and not be covered in blood himself?  In the civil trial no one had to prove that he really committed the crime, only that he could have.  A lot of innocent victims are in prison today because no one had to prove that they were guilty.
 
Reply with Quote Read Replies to this Message
llw1937
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
October 14, 2007, 9:00 pm PDT

THE O. J. BOOK BATTLE

Quote From: emilec132

I think it is tragec how people presume that OJ is guilty.  After all, he was aquitted in the criminal trial.  Everyone assumes that OJ went there to kill his wife and that poor Ron Goldman happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.  I think that Ron was the intended victim and that OJ's wife opened the door at the wrong time.  I think it was a drug related killing.  Wasn't Ron's roommate, also, killed just shortly afterward?  Food for thought people.  How could OJ have committed such a bloody crime and not be covered in blood himself?  In the civil trial no one had to prove that he really committed the crime, only that he could have.  A lot of innocent victims are in prison today because no one had to prove that they were guilty.

I think it is about time everyone stops discussing this matter. He got away with double murder because of gullible people that he never cared about. He will get away with this too. I think he is a disgrace to the human race. That woman that is with him deserves whatever she gets. SHE KNEW WHAT WAS WHAT WHEN SHE GOT INVOLVED WITH HIM. I wish everyone would stop putting his face everywhere. I can't stand to look at the monster. I wish they would wise up, lock up the monster and throw away the key. I wouldn't want to be his kids. I feel sorry for them. Open your eyes people, he is telling you he did it. Do you need a picture?
 
Reply with Quote Read Replies to this Message
readmore
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
October 15, 2007, 10:24 pm PDT

A travesty---not justice

Quote From: emilec132

I think it is tragec how people presume that OJ is guilty.  After all, he was aquitted in the criminal trial.  Everyone assumes that OJ went there to kill his wife and that poor Ron Goldman happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.  I think that Ron was the intended victim and that OJ's wife opened the door at the wrong time.  I think it was a drug related killing.  Wasn't Ron's roommate, also, killed just shortly afterward?  Food for thought people.  How could OJ have committed such a bloody crime and not be covered in blood himself?  In the civil trial no one had to prove that he really committed the crime, only that he could have.  A lot of innocent victims are in prison today because no one had to prove that they were guilty.

It does not matter what we "think" but what the Court does with the evidence.   EVIDENCE!

An aquittal means nothing when the man is the true murderer.  It just means the jury was deceived.

 

There is no evidence that these murders were drug-related. 

 

Courts/juries make mistakes.  They are human beings.  Juries let murderers walk, free; and juries imprison innocent people.   That is why we have an appellate process.

 

The burden of proof is on the State in a criminal trial;  but that proof will not withstand a tainted jury.

Today, DNA can help wrongly-convicted people get out of jail.

 

Let us not pretend to know the facts or evidence.   Bloody clothes are easily disposed,  just as these two beautiful people were destroyed.   Only a sociopath without a conscience can kiil and walk away.   

 
Reply with Quote Read Replies to this Message
karen1964

Message Emote
surprised
October 15, 2007, 11:31 pm PDT

OH COME ON!!

Quote From: emilec132

I think it is tragec how people presume that OJ is guilty.  After all, he was aquitted in the criminal trial.  Everyone assumes that OJ went there to kill his wife and that poor Ron Goldman happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.  I think that Ron was the intended victim and that OJ's wife opened the door at the wrong time.  I think it was a drug related killing.  Wasn't Ron's roommate, also, killed just shortly afterward?  Food for thought people.  How could OJ have committed such a bloody crime and not be covered in blood himself?  In the civil trial no one had to prove that he really committed the crime, only that he could have.  A lot of innocent victims are in prison today because no one had to prove that they were guilty.

I suppose the real killer followed Ron to Nicole's house and then stabbed them both repeatedly because Ron owed him some $ for a joint....Yeah that's it
 
Reply with Quote Read Replies to this Message
ms_korkie
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
October 16, 2007, 1:24 pm PDT

10/15 The O.J. Book Battle

Quote From: emilec132

I think it is tragec how people presume that OJ is guilty.  After all, he was aquitted in the criminal trial.  Everyone assumes that OJ went there to kill his wife and that poor Ron Goldman happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.  I think that Ron was the intended victim and that OJ's wife opened the door at the wrong time.  I think it was a drug related killing.  Wasn't Ron's roommate, also, killed just shortly afterward?  Food for thought people.  How could OJ have committed such a bloody crime and not be covered in blood himself?  In the civil trial no one had to prove that he really committed the crime, only that he could have.  A lot of innocent victims are in prison today because no one had to prove that they were guilty.
How can you even write that it is tragic the people presume OJ is guilty.  Aquittal was absolutely racial, and Cochrans, stupid razzle dazzle catch phrase, "If it don't fit, you must aquitt.  What is tragic is how a jury could come up with a "NOT GUILTY" in just a few hours.  After watching the trial, that jury would have been hung for sure had I been on the jury.  There is no way anyone could have convinced me to vote "NG" if it took a year.  I fully support the Goldman's and totally understand what and why they are doing what they are doing.  Think about it, think if it was your loved one brutally murdered and you knew the killer got away with it.  Don't you think you might be traumatized suffter PTSD and exact revenge at any corner?  God Bless the Goldman's and the Brown's and to prison with OJ.  Anyone who watched the trial, saw the evidence knows in their hearts and minds that OJ is an insaine brutal murderer.
 
Reply with Quote Read Replies to this Message
lwelshans
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
October 17, 2007, 2:05 pm PDT

Finally!

Quote From: emilec132

I think it is tragec how people presume that OJ is guilty.  After all, he was aquitted in the criminal trial.  Everyone assumes that OJ went there to kill his wife and that poor Ron Goldman happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.  I think that Ron was the intended victim and that OJ's wife opened the door at the wrong time.  I think it was a drug related killing.  Wasn't Ron's roommate, also, killed just shortly afterward?  Food for thought people.  How could OJ have committed such a bloody crime and not be covered in blood himself?  In the civil trial no one had to prove that he really committed the crime, only that he could have.  A lot of innocent victims are in prison today because no one had to prove that they were guilty.
I finally came across someone who had different insight into this whole matter.  Do you really think after all these years he would still remember every minute detail if he did do it?  I still don't think he did it and I don't think he would've left those kids alone in that house.  Regardless of what he has done recently, he was acquitted of murder, yet continues to be tried.
 
Reply with Quote Read Replies to this Message
tryhimonce
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
October 19, 2007, 2:14 pm PDT

oj

Quote From: emilec132

I think it is tragec how people presume that OJ is guilty.  After all, he was aquitted in the criminal trial.  Everyone assumes that OJ went there to kill his wife and that poor Ron Goldman happened to be in the wrong place at the wrong time.  I think that Ron was the intended victim and that OJ's wife opened the door at the wrong time.  I think it was a drug related killing.  Wasn't Ron's roommate, also, killed just shortly afterward?  Food for thought people.  How could OJ have committed such a bloody crime and not be covered in blood himself?  In the civil trial no one had to prove that he really committed the crime, only that he could have.  A lot of innocent victims are in prison today because no one had to prove that they were guilty.
I agree with this quote. Everybody always want to  assume the worst of OJ. I think someone else did it too and he was at the wrong place at the wrong time. I think they need to find the REAL killers and stop trying to keep getting OJ money because it won't bring their son back. OJ should not have to pay for something he didn't commit. It's always about money. Can they make their own?Leave OJ alone everytime they turn around Oj did this or he did that. Go out and find the real killer. Use the money for that instead of thing they want.
 
Reply with Quote Read Replies to this Message


Return to the Message Board


First Page | Previous Page | 1 | Next | Last