Quote From: hpmx59Doctor Part Phil Scandal Sex Teacher Two. Well Well Well hear we go again on Part two like yesterday.----
See you on Monday November 05th, 2007. Doctor Phil do remember to set your clocks back before you go
to bed on Saturday November 03rd, 2007. Sincerley Your. Russell Vlaanderen.-------------------------------------
Today I watched your show about Joelle, high school french teacher, accused of having inappropriate sexual contact with several male students. Before the results of the polygraph were even given I knew the young man was lying and that Joelle was telling the truth.
What really struck me about the show was that Dr. Phil insinuated that Joelle might be guilty because she wanted to talk about details of the young man's story and how they were not true. She was mentioning how his story could not be right because her car at the time had headlights that could not be manually turned off and he claimed she had turned off the headlights. I know exactly how she felt! How could Dr. Phil not understand this? How could he think that because of this she was making herself look guilty?
She was going to get to the bigger issues, She just wanted to be very through and make sure everyone knew ALL of his lies and thus proving that he is a liar. I do the same thing when I am falsely accused of something. I don't just deny it with no explanation. I deny it and proceed to give all my reasons why this story must be false including pointing out all the lies that my accuser is coming up with in his story.
Joelle was soft spoken and controlled considering what she was being accused of. This just shows that she has class. From reading others comments I see that some people believe she was guilty because she was not screaming at the top of her lungs that she was innocent. That's just not so, she just has class and knows that yelling won't fix things.
From a viewer in Spokane, WA