Replies to '12/25 Parent Trap'

Nope, she shouldn't, BUT it happens.....

The point being...a man should have a choice, it should NOT be made for him.

I think he should not have hand over financiall support to the woman who decieved him.  Let her go find the bio dad and let him support the child financially. Would the husband even have stayed in the marriage had he known his wife cheated and the child wasn't his? Who knowns? He was never given the choice!

What about the emotional bond she robbed the child of with her bio dad? He has missed out also.

And really, if you think about it, I don't think a woman should be able to go after a man out of the blue and demand child support from he bio dad and then they go back all those years and make him pay..it should start from the time he found out, because once again, it's her fault for waiting so long, plus she should have to pay back all the money she frauded the alleged father of.

there should be a law against child fraud. if you are caught through dna committing child fraud no matter how long it has been, you should reimburse back all the money from child support and serve at least 6 mths in jail mandatory, then the game stops here. the child is the one that suffers, but you should not have an innocent man pay for the mother's crime.

Let's just use simple common sense. If the child is not the father's and he was not a legal adopter of the child, in other words, he's been deceived, he should never be financially responsible! It's a double insult! If the father chooses to continue the relationship with a child that is not his, which I believe is the right thing to do, he should only pay for the child when the child is with him. It really is that simple. The perpetrator of the deception should be held accountable in every way.