Replies to '01/07 Don't Be That Girl'

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
January 6, 2008, 8:43 pm PST

I agree!!

Quote From: canada_here

I could name a few...

How about the "Mama's boy"? Many women have met several of them during their dating lives.

Then there's "Peter Pan" (the little boy who reufses to grow up). We all know some of these, too.

And of course there's always "the Playboy". We are all familiar with his needs.

 

I think it's important to note that women aren't the only ones who can be labelled. Maybe it's more appropriate to ask what function these labels serve, outside of a clincial context.

How do these descriptons help the people who are being labelled, to have richer, fuller lives?

 

Simply put: they don't.

 

Perhaps we ought to be asking what the individual assigning the label is getting out of it. There has to be a payoff in it for someone because, like stereotypes, labeling persists.

 

Perhaps those who are quick to judge ought to examine their need to do so BEFORE pointing a finger at others.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Well said my fellow Canadian, I completely agree with you.

 

GO SENS GO!!

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
January 7, 2008, 4:33 pm PST

labels

Quote From: canada_here

I could name a few...

How about the "Mama's boy"? Many women have met several of them during their dating lives.

Then there's "Peter Pan" (the little boy who reufses to grow up). We all know some of these, too.

And of course there's always "the Playboy". We are all familiar with his needs.

 

I think it's important to note that women aren't the only ones who can be labelled. Maybe it's more appropriate to ask what function these labels serve, outside of a clincial context.

How do these descriptons help the people who are being labelled, to have richer, fuller lives?

 

Simply put: they don't.

 

Perhaps we ought to be asking what the individual assigning the label is getting out of it. There has to be a payoff in it for someone because, like stereotypes, labeling persists.

 

Perhaps those who are quick to judge ought to examine their need to do so BEFORE pointing a finger at others.

 

 

 

 

 

 

I totally agree that guys have their own issues. I love how you put it! The "Peter Pans" are the worst! How do you like those sports fanatics? (not the fans, but the fanatics who's life revolves around their team's schedule: See the movie "Fast Pitch" with Jimmy Fallon. haha)

I think Dr. Travis recognizes guys have their issues too by the way he said we should write a book called "Don't Be That Guy".

Also, I think these labels can serve a purpose. I think it is important for one to recognize why they aren't finding a mate. Unfortunately, the reasons are often hurtful, but once they are realized, that person has the option to change and lead a more fulfilling life. Let's face it, the "wet blanket" or the "desperate girl" even the "peter pans" and "mama's boys" of this world aren't exactly leading these rich, fulfilling lives. The focus, however, should be how to be a happy person and not how to snatch a mate.

But what do I know? I'm only 26 and no psychology degree here!
 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
January 9, 2008, 10:46 pm PST

So true

Quote From: canada_here

I could name a few...

How about the "Mama's boy"? Many women have met several of them during their dating lives.

Then there's "Peter Pan" (the little boy who reufses to grow up). We all know some of these, too.

And of course there's always "the Playboy". We are all familiar with his needs.

 

I think it's important to note that women aren't the only ones who can be labelled. Maybe it's more appropriate to ask what function these labels serve, outside of a clincial context.

How do these descriptons help the people who are being labelled, to have richer, fuller lives?

 

Simply put: they don't.

 

Perhaps we ought to be asking what the individual assigning the label is getting out of it. There has to be a payoff in it for someone because, like stereotypes, labeling persists.

 

Perhaps those who are quick to judge ought to examine their need to do so BEFORE pointing a finger at others.

 

 

 

 

 

 

Another type which I named is "INSTANT POTATO man" .. This type is a guy wants everything to happen ASAP including jumping in the sack.  Not allowing time to get to know the woman. 

 

Yes, Dr Phil, men are visual.. and most only want that barbie doll type of gal.  Why do you think there are so many women of all ages who starve themselves to meet up to a guys imagination of how a woman should look.  Talk about building up a womans self esteme.  Doesn't happen. 

 

What happened to dating?  Learning each other while having fun.  I believe that a relationship doesn't have to be a job.. You should be able to flow with each other. Enjoying those special times while each of them are learning about each other. I look and want my best friend" and dont want to settle for anything less.  I have learned I don't have to play those silly games. 

 

 

 


Return to the Message Board


First Page | Previous Page | 1 | Next Page | Last Page