Message Boards

Replies to '07/25 "It's My Baby Too!"'

 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
angry
April 26, 2008, 9:40 pm PDT

WHO ARE YOU TO SAY THIS

Quote From: cyncritter

These tugs-of-war only hurt people, and can also damage the child at the center.

If he wants to raise a child, why doesn't he find a woman, settle down, get married, and have one together? This kind of custody battle can drag on for a long, long time, keeping everyone in limbo, including the baby. The baby needs to be the FIRST in consideration. If the family with whom the baby is placed is a good family, then that should be enough to make everyone happy.

Emotions affect babies. When everything is in chaos around the child's custody, if affects all the signals that child is getting from her would-be parents. This is not an It's-mine-and-I-have-a-right-to-have-you situation. This should be about what's the very best for the child.
HES A FATHER WTH ARE YOU THINKING PEOPLE LIKE YOU IS WHAT MAKES ME MAD, AND HE MUST HAVE THE BEST INTEREST IN HIS CHILD , WHY WOULD HE WANT THE CHILD? DUH ITS HIS BLOOD AND HE WANTS TO RAISE HIS CHILD, AS LONG AS THIS MAN CAN PROVIDE ,NOT A DRUG ABUSER, SEXUAL ABUSER,  OR DOES NOT HAVE A BAD  RECORD THAT HAS TO DO WITH CHILDREN OR DRUGS HE  DESERVES  TO RAISE HIS CHILD,, THEIR SCHOULD BE LAWS AGAINST MOTHERS WHO DONT TRY TO NOTIFY THE FATHER BEFOR ANY DESIONS MAKING... SAD SITUATION
 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
April 27, 2008, 10:50 am PDT

What were they thinking?

Quote From: cyncritter

These tugs-of-war only hurt people, and can also damage the child at the center.

If he wants to raise a child, why doesn't he find a woman, settle down, get married, and have one together? This kind of custody battle can drag on for a long, long time, keeping everyone in limbo, including the baby. The baby needs to be the FIRST in consideration. If the family with whom the baby is placed is a good family, then that should be enough to make everyone happy.

Emotions affect babies. When everything is in chaos around the child's custody, if affects all the signals that child is getting from her would-be parents. This is not an It's-mine-and-I-have-a-right-to-have-you situation. This should be about what's the very best for the child.

   An obscure law wherein a man has to register having sex with every woman in order to be a candidate to adopt his own child, can't possibly be on strong constitutional ground.  If a DNA test proves that the child is his, it should go to court. 

   

    No.  Finding a woman, marrying her, and settling down and forgetting about his child is not in everyone's best interests.  It would help the adoptive parents, though.  They do not have "property rights" to the child, either.     

 
User Mood
Distressed

Message Emote
confused
April 27, 2008, 6:28 pm PDT

WHAT!!!???

Quote From: cyncritter

These tugs-of-war only hurt people, and can also damage the child at the center.

If he wants to raise a child, why doesn't he find a woman, settle down, get married, and have one together? This kind of custody battle can drag on for a long, long time, keeping everyone in limbo, including the baby. The baby needs to be the FIRST in consideration. If the family with whom the baby is placed is a good family, then that should be enough to make everyone happy.

Emotions affect babies. When everything is in chaos around the child's custody, if affects all the signals that child is getting from her would-be parents. This is not an It's-mine-and-I-have-a-right-to-have-you situation. This should be about what's the very best for the child.
The only thing that would make it drag out is the father's rights as the biological parent not being respected.  If the adopted parents respect his rights and that they were violated, then it will be over lickety split!  How is he at fault for dragging out a long court battle and keeping the child's life in limbo?  The adoptive parents are just as guilty of that.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 30, 2008, 8:02 am PDT

04/30 "It's My Baby Too!"

Quote From: cyncritter

These tugs-of-war only hurt people, and can also damage the child at the center.

If he wants to raise a child, why doesn't he find a woman, settle down, get married, and have one together? This kind of custody battle can drag on for a long, long time, keeping everyone in limbo, including the baby. The baby needs to be the FIRST in consideration. If the family with whom the baby is placed is a good family, then that should be enough to make everyone happy.

Emotions affect babies. When everything is in chaos around the child's custody, if affects all the signals that child is getting from her would-be parents. This is not an It's-mine-and-I-have-a-right-to-have-you situation. This should be about what's the very best for the child.
This is absolutely bizarre.  People are saying he should move on with his life and have another baby in a two parent home!!  That is his child and if she didn't want to take the responsibility then it should have went to the father!!   The statement a two parent home means nothing to me, I know many two parent homes that do not provide the stability that a single parent home does. I have raised my son on my own for 13 years. There is more love in this home than a lot of homes of two parent families.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 30, 2008, 1:51 pm PDT

04/30 "It's My Baby Too!"

Quote From: cyncritter

These tugs-of-war only hurt people, and can also damage the child at the center.

If he wants to raise a child, why doesn't he find a woman, settle down, get married, and have one together? This kind of custody battle can drag on for a long, long time, keeping everyone in limbo, including the baby. The baby needs to be the FIRST in consideration. If the family with whom the baby is placed is a good family, then that should be enough to make everyone happy.

Emotions affect babies. When everything is in chaos around the child's custody, if affects all the signals that child is getting from her would-be parents. This is not an It's-mine-and-I-have-a-right-to-have-you situation. This should be about what's the very best for the child.

Are you serious? If he wants to raise a child then find a woman and all that??? He had that... he had a child and none of this would be happening if Esther's dad hadn't taken it upon himself to decide what should happen. Bryce wants to raise the baby he already has... is that so wrong?? When that little girl grows up and asks about her parents do ya really think that anyone is going to tell her the truth that her own birth mother and her biological grandparents decided that her father shouldn't have anything to do with her.

 
User Mood
Stressed

Message Emote
blank
April 30, 2008, 2:13 pm PDT

Aww that sounds so sweet

Quote From: cyncritter

These tugs-of-war only hurt people, and can also damage the child at the center.

If he wants to raise a child, why doesn't he find a woman, settle down, get married, and have one together? This kind of custody battle can drag on for a long, long time, keeping everyone in limbo, including the baby. The baby needs to be the FIRST in consideration. If the family with whom the baby is placed is a good family, then that should be enough to make everyone happy.

Emotions affect babies. When everything is in chaos around the child's custody, if affects all the signals that child is getting from her would-be parents. This is not an It's-mine-and-I-have-a-right-to-have-you situation. This should be about what's the very best for the child.

"If he wants to raise a child, why doesn't he find a woman, settle down, get married, and have one together?" HE HAS A BABY DAMN IT AND HE HAS A RIGHT TO RAISE THAT CHILD....NO COURT EVER FOUND HIM UNFIT

YOUR STATEMENT IS VERY FAIRY TALE AND ALL BUT UNFORTUNATLY HE DIDNT GET A CHOICE...IF ANYONE IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE STRESS ON THE CHILD IT IS NOT THE FATHER BUT RATHER THE MOTHER, HER IMMORAL PARENTS AND THE GENIUS LAWYER THEY HIRED

 
User Mood
Apathetic

Message Emote
blank
April 30, 2008, 3:06 pm PDT

04/30 "It's My Baby Too!"

Quote From: cyncritter

These tugs-of-war only hurt people, and can also damage the child at the center.

If he wants to raise a child, why doesn't he find a woman, settle down, get married, and have one together? This kind of custody battle can drag on for a long, long time, keeping everyone in limbo, including the baby. The baby needs to be the FIRST in consideration. If the family with whom the baby is placed is a good family, then that should be enough to make everyone happy.

Emotions affect babies. When everything is in chaos around the child's custody, if affects all the signals that child is getting from her would-be parents. This is not an It's-mine-and-I-have-a-right-to-have-you situation. This should be about what's the very best for the child.
I agree, but I  think the Father has rights also.  Maybe a compromise would be in order, let the father have visitation just as the mother does.  The adoptive parents have already given their love to this baby and the baby has, I am sure bonded with this family.  I think the baby would be best off left with the adoptive parents with visitation given to both biological parents and grandparents.  The baby should come first.
 
User Mood
Cranky

Message Emote
blank
April 30, 2008, 4:22 pm PDT

This is an outrage to parents

Quote From: cyncritter

These tugs-of-war only hurt people, and can also damage the child at the center.

If he wants to raise a child, why doesn't he find a woman, settle down, get married, and have one together? This kind of custody battle can drag on for a long, long time, keeping everyone in limbo, including the baby. The baby needs to be the FIRST in consideration. If the family with whom the baby is placed is a good family, then that should be enough to make everyone happy.

Emotions affect babies. When everything is in chaos around the child's custody, if affects all the signals that child is getting from her would-be parents. This is not an It's-mine-and-I-have-a-right-to-have-you situation. This should be about what's the very best for the child.
 This man asked her to marry him...she knew he wanted to be a part of this child's life.  What is best for the child?...of all the men who don't care about their child this man wants to know, love and be a part of HIS child's life!.  How dare this stupid girl and her stupid father decide that the father of this child not have a part of HIS OWN CHILD!  Why, because he didn't know about some stupid law that he had to register the fact that he wanted to have his child!  She doesn't even want her own child and this awful person she calls a father supports her getting rid of if...like it was some puppy they don't want to bother with.  What is best for the child is to know that the person that created them loves them and wants them and wants to be a part of their life.  So many adopted children ask "why didn't my parents want me" and here is a father who WANTS them and he can't be because what I feel is an unconstitional law.  This piece of crap that the mother calls a father threatens to MURDER, ABORT this child and he feels he is in the best position to decide the well fair of this child?  I hope Bryce fights this all the way to the Supreme Court and gets these stupid laws changed.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 30, 2008, 5:03 pm PDT

Totally disgusted!!!

Quote From: cyncritter

These tugs-of-war only hurt people, and can also damage the child at the center.

If he wants to raise a child, why doesn't he find a woman, settle down, get married, and have one together? This kind of custody battle can drag on for a long, long time, keeping everyone in limbo, including the baby. The baby needs to be the FIRST in consideration. If the family with whom the baby is placed is a good family, then that should be enough to make everyone happy.

Emotions affect babies. When everything is in chaos around the child's custody, if affects all the signals that child is getting from her would-be parents. This is not an It's-mine-and-I-have-a-right-to-have-you situation. This should be about what's the very best for the child.

I cannot believe that someone would actually think that a child having their loving, caring biological parent is not what is best for the child!  It's easy for someone to say that this should be let go for the child's sake when they have not been through it themselves. 

 

I think that some people would see things a little differently if the shoe was on their foot and their child was UNDERHANDEDLY taken from them!

 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
April 30, 2008, 5:13 pm PDT

04/30 "It's My Baby Too!"

Quote From: cyncritter

These tugs-of-war only hurt people, and can also damage the child at the center.

If he wants to raise a child, why doesn't he find a woman, settle down, get married, and have one together? This kind of custody battle can drag on for a long, long time, keeping everyone in limbo, including the baby. The baby needs to be the FIRST in consideration. If the family with whom the baby is placed is a good family, then that should be enough to make everyone happy.

Emotions affect babies. When everything is in chaos around the child's custody, if affects all the signals that child is getting from her would-be parents. This is not an It's-mine-and-I-have-a-right-to-have-you situation. This should be about what's the very best for the child.

Well maybe you have one of your own to give him, (since you think it is that easy to forget one and get a new one!) go start another family?? What a stupid comment. Yes these tug-of wars hurt people and perhaps the mother and her controlling family should have thought of that before they gave this child to a family friend that they have access to. Sounds to me the mother didn't want the responsibility  financially for this child nor did her parents but they wanted to keep the child within their reach to watch her grow, how selfish is that! I really do not feel sorry for the parents that wanted to adopt this child either, they knew that this was not being handle thru the proper channels, nobody gets to adopt a friends baby just like that. I believe thru a real agency the father would have been included before a child is given to another party. This was all done behind the fathers back, and it was handled by the maternal grandfather, he took matters in his own hands when he talked with the father and the father said no I will raise her myself, I do not want her put up for adoption. This girl and her family just didn't want the father having the baby, that is why the girls dad threatened aborting the baby if he didn't agree. I hope this dad saves this taping and if things go against him and he does not get custody of her she will one day seek him out (or he will wait for her 18th B-D) and he can show this tape to her. It will show her that he fought for her, that he wanted her, and that her bio-mother and her parents that she grew up seeing were the ones who kept him away, and that they are the ones who threatened to have her aborted.

This all lies in the mothers lap, and her controlling parents.

 


Return to the Message Board


First Page | Previous Page | 1 | 2 | Next | Last