|
June 13, 2008, 12:37 pm PDT
06/12 Teacher Sex Scandal, Part 1
Quote From: jokr8790Legally, the fact that she was acquitted in the criminal trial (and yes, the dismissal, which I think was with prejudice, meaning she can never be tried again is identical to an acquittal) doesn't affect the administrative allegations, because they are different standards of proof. The administrative hearing, on her license, however, does have a legally preclusive effect. In other words, having been cleared administratively, the school officials claims cannot be legally recognized. The school board should not only reinstate her, they are going to be liable in a big way monetarily. There has to be standardized training and people specifically delegated to deal with such allegations in an appropriate manner by the schools whenever allegations of this sort arise. now that I've watched the fourth boy, who also failed the polygraph examination Dr Phil arranged for him, I'm strongly convinced of Joelle's innocence. Having thus been cleared, I can't understand why she hasn't been reinstated. What's keeping the school district from reinstating her? "Carry-it-with-them-to-the-grave" pride? Fear of "eating crow" and admitting they acted too hastily? I consider their refusal to reinstate Joelle a "face saving" gesture that just makes them look stupid. Yes, if Joelle's credentials are reinstated, returning to the classroom might feel awkward. But, she seems like a classy, confident woman who can handle it. It should be her decision.
|
