Message Boards

Replies to 'Co-Parenting'

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
June 27, 2008, 10:47 pm PDT

Co-Parenting

Quote From: maxthrottle

First a litle background.  I am currently 48, my off again/on again  girlfriend 40.  We've dated off and on for 6 years.  Usually we end up breaking up because she has a bad temper and things get out of control, and I can't take it anymore. When the temper isn't there she's great, and obviously the physical part ifs usually pretty good. Since our last breakup she has informed me she is pregnant.  Several days later she announced we should get married, and she wants to move in.  She has no health care insurance and want's to be on mine.  Given our history I'm not sure which way to go here. I have no problem helping with her healthcare costs for the child out of pocket.  I question whether our child would be better off with us as separate or together given our history of fighting and breaking up. I think it would be a matter of time before we ended up apart.  I think both of us want the kid though, although she tends to be very negtive when things don't go her way. I would like to know from anyone here with experience, particularly someone who lived through something like this which is better for the kid.  Parents who are together for the kid even though problems remain in the relationship, or parents who remain separate and share custody. I don't like either alternative, but choices are limited here. Any other tips on how to handle this are appreciated.  Neither of us have ever had kids.  She is hispanic and has her extended family locally and I have no family in the area.

You "think" you want the kid" I don't mean to be rude - but why are you thinking about all of this now?  You really should have considered all of these things before you got her pregnant.   Now you are bringing a child into the world with a mother that has temper issues and two parents who can't live togethor.  I would seriously consider giving the child up for adoption to two parents who would give the child the home he/she deserves.  This is really sad and I'm not being judgemental but I really encourage you to put the interests of the child first - give him/her a loving home and environment that two parents who love each other can provide.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
June 28, 2008, 12:18 pm PDT

hmm

Quote From: maxthrottle

First a litle background.  I am currently 48, my off again/on again  girlfriend 40.  We've dated off and on for 6 years.  Usually we end up breaking up because she has a bad temper and things get out of control, and I can't take it anymore. When the temper isn't there she's great, and obviously the physical part ifs usually pretty good. Since our last breakup she has informed me she is pregnant.  Several days later she announced we should get married, and she wants to move in.  She has no health care insurance and want's to be on mine.  Given our history I'm not sure which way to go here. I have no problem helping with her healthcare costs for the child out of pocket.  I question whether our child would be better off with us as separate or together given our history of fighting and breaking up. I think it would be a matter of time before we ended up apart.  I think both of us want the kid though, although she tends to be very negtive when things don't go her way. I would like to know from anyone here with experience, particularly someone who lived through something like this which is better for the kid.  Parents who are together for the kid even though problems remain in the relationship, or parents who remain separate and share custody. I don't like either alternative, but choices are limited here. Any other tips on how to handle this are appreciated.  Neither of us have ever had kids.  She is hispanic and has her extended family locally and I have no family in the area.

You know the pro’s and the con’s of this relationship. My advice for you is to give her some reasonable boundaries/rules; the number one most important one is that she has to begin going to therapy. I know that because she has no health insurance, that is an issue. Getting married is a huge decision, but so is having a child! I think that having a baby is a bigger decision, and if getting married is just a by-product of the pregnancy, then think of it this way: you can get a divorce later if things don’t go well- but you’ll always have the baby. Do what is best and right for the child. The child’s mother having health insurance and therefore the ability to get therapy, prenatal care, and other benefits that come along with it, is best for the baby. This woman has a long pattern of being negative, etc., and it will take work with a professional to realize how to un-learn those behaviors.
 


Return to the Message Board


First Page | Previous Page | 1 | Next Page | Last Page