Your daughter had to make a very difficult decision. No one can say for sure what they would do in that case unless they have been there. Even then, no two people think alike, so what may be right for one, is wrong for another. If I had a choice of being born with multiple handicaps, and having to face a liftime of suffering, or not being born, I'd hope my mother loved me enough to free me. I may get bashed for saying that, but it is honestly how I feel.
Being pro-choice is our right, by law. After seeing that show, I had to ask myself what would have been better for the children? They are here, so they have to be given the best possible care...but WHAT IS THAT???? I saw that little girl from the Ukraine...it was tragic. In my opinion, if there is a family better equipped to care for her, that is where she should be. Then, you look at the flip side...what further damage would be done if she were uprooted...then, you bounce back to what will happen to her if she stays and her mother's feelings do not change...? There is no magic bullit, and you cannot force, shame or instill love into a mother.
You look at Alex. This is not good. I understand the reluctance and fears about in house treatment...but to NOT take it, in my mind is worse. The saddest part is that you really cannot ask these children for their opinion...we project our emotions onto them, but Alex may be more comfortable in an in-patient facility, maybe not...and so it goes..on and on ...and it will paralyze you, and the child.
Look at the growing popularity of living wills and the assignment of health care proxys to carry out our wishes if we become unable to speak. We have that choice...these children do not. My living will may hault treatment before some else's does. That is our right. Even the Catholic Church does NOT mandate extreme measures to keep a person alive. I would not accept a feeding tube. Someone else will. I have a DNR...does not force it onto you.
Your daughter took her situation and she did what she felt was best for her unborn child and for her family...made with pain, suffered guilt, not easy. Had she given birth, she may have felt even more guilt if the child suffered, and she felt she could have prevented it. No easy answers, no judgement need be passed.
I know of a family, through a friend, who had a baby two months ago. She seemed fine until she began to seize. Her diagnosis is that she has a very rare condition where one side of the brain is overgrown, while the other is undeveloped. VERY little is known about this, so the parents went to a top hospital where the procedure to stop seizures has been done...less than ten times. They put her under anesthesia for 7 hours, removed the larger part of the brain to the extent they felt was sufficient. Two days later, she seized again. Next surgery is Monday...more removal, another crap shoot...and it is a guarentee that she will be disabled...maybe a vegetable...they do not know. I would have refused...People think I'm playing God, I think the doctors are playing God, and using that baby for more information about the disorder. A few years back, she would have passed away as there was nothing...now they have a "LITTLE" idea of what MAY save her life...in my opinion, the information is not enough at this time and the technique is not perfected to the time when it can be used as a HUMANE tool of treatment.
So who is "RIGHT" when it' s all so wrong.
You were very brave to post and my wishes are that your family finds peace.