Replies to 'Spanking: Useful or Cruel?'

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
September 5, 2008, 10:24 pm PDT

Spanking: Useful or Cruel?

Quote From: jasper34

Spanking a child with their pants pulled down is often sexual abuse in addition to physical abuse. A child who is old enough to be embarrassed and humiliated by their private parts being exposed is experiencing sexual abuse whether or not the parent  means it as such. The buttocks are an erogenous zone. This type of spanking is particularly harmful to female children who often grow up associating pain and humiliation with sex. I grew up with a mother who turned me over to my father to be spanked in this way with a large wooden paddle until his arm was tired. Does this still affect my at 45?  Yes.  It should be against the law to do to a child what would send you to jail if you did to your neighbor.  Children are not chattel.
So...how about people who pinch or pat their child's butt out of affection?

Just so you know, not everyone feels the butt is an erogenous zone.  Different body parts can have different meanings depending on what is happening and how.

I have breasts, they can be sexual or they can be used to feed my off spring. When my daughter was sucking on my breasts it was not sexual. When my husband sucks on my breasts it's sexual.

When my mom, even now at 29, slaps my butt it is a sign of affection that I like and have liked since my childhood. I also pat and pinch my daughters butt out of affection. This is not sexual.

I am against spanking, but this argument falls short.
 


Return to the Message Board


First Page | Previous Page | 1 | Next Page | Last Page