Message Boards

Topic : 06/12 On the Outs With In-Laws

Number of Replies: 603
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Friday, February 24, 2006, 11:23:38 am
Author : DrPhilBoard1

(Original Air Date: 02/28/06) Manipulative, violent and diabolical. These are just some of the words Anna-Laura uses to describe her mother-in-law, Janice, who she says is destroying her marriage. Anna-Laura says Janice hates her so much, she’s taken a swing at her and even threatened to hire someone to kill her. Janice denies the accusations and says they’re all lies. Where does Morgan, Anna-Laura’s husband, stand on the issue? After not speaking for almost a year, Anna-Laura and Morgan face off with Janice in front of Dr. Phil. With their relationship on the rocks, can Anna-Laura and Morgan find a way to end this war with his mother and save their marriage? If your extended family is spiraling out of control, find out how to get your relationship to take a turn in the other direction. Join the discussion.

 

Find out what happened on the show.

More June 2006 Show Boards.


As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
February 28, 2006, 5:15 pm PST

Supervised visits - ONLY!!!!!

In my opinion - Janice is lying, and should only have supervised visits with her grandchildren. I believe she HAS made these evil threats to her daughter-in-law, and she's too ashamed to admit to them on national television because it will destroy any chance she may have of seeing her grandchildren.  

  

Janice was caught with her pants down with she carelessly called her son a "wuss", revealing what a toxic influence she truly is. Laura nailed it when she pointed this out to the viewing audience, and needs to be considered, along with everything else, in what role she plays in her grandchildrens lives.  

  

Supervised visits only for Janice!! 

  

  

 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
confused
February 28, 2006, 5:15 pm PST

You're right!

Quote From: sappell

All this talk about the mil and nothing about the wife!  Was I the only one who saw through her??  First she files for divorce and then says "I'm not going anywhere"  Then when DR Phil asks her about how she said she wouldn't abandon her children and now they are in foster care she totally blames Morgan for it, saying "I didn't make that decision.  I am not the custodial parent"  Well you can't tell me she just had absolutely no decision in that matter.  And then she gets all defensive when the mil calls him a Wuss on national tv, and she goes on to say she won't kick him out because he can't afford to live on his own because he doesn't have a good enough job!!  Way to kick him in the n*ts there lady!!  Tell the world he can't support himself!!  He looked like a little injured puppy up there that whole time and I know why!!  Between the mom and the wife, this guy doesn't get a break!!  Geez...
 You know, I never even thought about it like that, but its true! If he's not having his Mom rule his life, then his wife does! He should have spoken up for himself when the Mom called him a wuss.And to claim she is totally not in the decision about the kids is a bit far-fetched. Maybe he should tell them both to back off.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
February 28, 2006, 5:18 pm PST

I agree

Quote From: getalife48

I think that the daughter-in-law is the controlling manipulative one.  She is divorcing her husband, his kids are gone to foster homes and this gals behavior on the show was just a small taste of what she is probably like in person.  She could not control herself even for one hour!   

I do agree the mother-in-law probably plays a part in this, but I certainly do not believe to the extend that was protrayed on the show.   Morgan had probably been warned by his wife that he had better step up to the plate or the divorce was going to be final.   

I think that the divorce thing is just one more way of her manipulating her husband.  What is that about?  No one asked why his children were in foster care.  I think she put them there after much manipulation with the dad and probably threats of divorce.   

This gal needs serious help (the daughter-in-law) and hopefully after she is gone Dr Phil can put the pieces back together again for this family.  Oh I am sure she will be gone when the party is over.  This is about control on her part and Morgan will be left picking up the pieces with his family when she is gone.  

Just my opinion,but what I saw was ONE SICK COOKIE and it was not the mom.   

Hang in there mom and just give her all the space she wants she will be gone long before you will.  She is running out of things to bitch about and the kids will be fine with Dr Phil involved.   

So glad to know that someone will finally be taking care of the kids through all of this!
 

Message Emote
blank
February 28, 2006, 5:20 pm PST

JANICE

 How can this woman think sooo little of her son to put him and his family thru this. And to say that  Anna Laura is over weight and not attractive...hey Janice....try looking in the mirror.  You're no beauty  not to mention you're no light weight either. Have you ever heard of the saying...beauty is in the eye of the beholder.  Evidently  Morgan saw the beauty in Anna Laura cuz her married her.
Where is Janice's husband/Morgan's father. If he felt sooo strongly about this, why didn't he come on the show. This woman (janice) couldn't tell the truth if her life depended on it.
She makes the movie Monster -in-law look like an ANGEL.
IMO and taking into consideration to the health and well being of the kids and Anna Laura's mom,  it's just too bad that they can't move away from Janice and NOT give her their address or phone numbers. I hope Morgan will continue to stand up for his wife.
From a gal who feels so lucky to have a not only a great MOM but also a great  MOTHER-IN-LAW.
 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
February 28, 2006, 5:22 pm PST

This sounds very familiar

I divorced my 1st husband "almost" completely due to his controlling mother. He was an only child and when her husband met with a freakish death, she clung to him like a leach. She hated me and we had knock down drag out fights. I lived the most miserable existance for 5 years torn between my husband who I truly did love and a total wimp that I truly did hate because he refused to stand up to her and tell her to get the h _ _ _ out of our lives.  He was her only living relative and he felt very indebted (I guess) to her since she raised him as a single mom with basically no skills and gave him everything even when it meant she had to go without.  She loved him more than life itself and he knew it and he simply didn't have the courage to stand up to her and tell her to leave us alone.  I can easily see how it can happen and how it can be so hard for a husband to do what he knows it right.  

We did move away from her not only once but twice but she packed up and followed us both times.  The second time, I packed up and left him.  That was all she wrote.  No, not exactly, after that, he did get up the nerve to tell her to get out but it was too late.  I had lost all respect for him and the love that I had once had was gone.  Sad story but the moral is, don't marry an only child of a widowed woman. 

 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
giddy
February 28, 2006, 5:24 pm PST

tehe

Quote From: nasale

very close-just put a 'u' instead of '0'. I apologise. I'm one of those weirdos who can sniff out a misspelled word at fifty paces.THe strangest part of it is, that the harder the word, the easier it is for me to spell. It's the easy ones that get me. (my whole family is like that) 

Hi Nasale!  Its good to see you are still helping out with proper spelling and pronounciation!  (Oh dear!  Did I spell pronounciation correctly?    ;)   

  

Btw... I was lmao over your Poor Charlie and his sore rear end(from riding the fence)post yesterday.  That was pretty good!    :D 

  

  

  

  

  

  

  

 
User Mood
Bored

Message Emote
blank
February 28, 2006, 5:25 pm PST

Family Feud

Unfortunately, restraining orders are only as effective as people want them to be.  If the mother-in-law is actually stalking and harassing the family, and as she kept saying, "prove it", the daughter and son need to take further action by installing a surveilance camera with a recorder that they can turn on when they see the mother-in-law drive by.  They may also need to carry a video camera.  Law enforcement and the courts need some kind of affirmative proof (hard evidence or witnesses) or the case will be in trouble.  It's sad if it comes to this, but it may be the only way.  I've seen too many people "cry wolf" with restraining orders just to manipulate things their way.
 
User Mood
Touched

Message Emote
blank
February 28, 2006, 5:27 pm PST

Dr Phil answered that question

Quote From: getalife48

The kids are in a theraputic foster home.  He even said that with their disabilities, institutionalization might be necessary.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
February 28, 2006, 5:28 pm PST

Men don't need mothering...

Quote From: white_m_

I think what you said about "taking care" of the son/husband is the crux of the problem.  The mother is done mothering and must establish a new kind of relationship with her son and she sees the wife as the new mother.  Whereas wives do not want to "mother" their husbands.  Wives want a grown man that is able to operate a stove, operate a washing machine, and knows how to drink milk without getting a mustache.  A mother takes care of child care needs, a wife takes care of adult relationship needs.  It's very different and problems between the two women arise when either one or both forget there are differences.
And as the mother of 3 boys, ages 9 - 13, I'll tell you that all of those things that you love (like cleaning their faces) won't be so special to you in 10 years (hopefully). You'll slowly grow to enjoy their independent thoughts and viewpoints. You'll stand a bit more on the sidelines. So by the time they are married, you'll enjoy watching them love and grow... from a healthy distance. My mother-in-law is great at doing just that and I couldn't be more grateful for the way she brought him up. He's a strong and grown up man. AND we love visiting with his parents often!
 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
February 28, 2006, 5:31 pm PST

02/28 On the Outs With In-Laws

   

  Did anyone notice that the chidren were "step children" of Anna Laura ?  I'm just wondering if this horrible MIL drove the first wife off also.  I didn't buy a word the MIL said either.  Perhaps because I had a MIL who did some of the same type of behavior for years until a therapist intervened.  It hurt so badly.  I just watched the smirk the MIL constantly demonstrated throughout the show.  She wasn't fooling me.  I guess you had to have "been there" at one time in your life to catch the same crap she was pulling.  Anna Laura probably was very hurt the first few years - you didn't get to see that on the show.  You only saw the anger.  Good for her.  It really hurts to be played by a husband and MIL.  And trying to protect children who are not yours.  I don't know.  Dr. Phil didn't really handle the show too well.  It was lacking in a lot of ways.  I'm not getting a lot of information from his shows lately and too many commercials to really have much of an opinion.  Thank you TIVO - I can save time and scan through the commercials! 

  

To couples who are in the same situations:  Try to establish boundaries early on.  It should save you a lot of heart ache.  I admire those who have had the guts to go forward.  You did the right thing. 

  

Just my opinion.  Oh - I've been married for 24 years and once we had a therapist who intervened, things went much more smoothly. 

  

  

 
First | Prev | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 | 32 | 33 | Next | Last