Message Boards

Topic : 07/06 Baby Wars

Number of Replies: 7225
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Thursday, April 13, 2006, 01:22:17 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1
(Original Air Date: 04/21/06) Being a parent is hard enough, but what happens when Mom and Dad can't agree on how many kids to have, how to raise 'em and how to get ‘em to sleep?  Sometimes, it can lead to an all-out baby war! Matt's baby battle ended up in front of a judge and made headlines. He was ordered to pay child support for the baby he had with his ex-girlfriend, but he says he shouldn't have to cough up the money because she told him she wasn't able to get pregnant, and he told her he didn't want to be a father. He, his attorney, and the director of the National Center for Men discuss the lawsuit they filed, known as “Roe v. Wade for Men,” arguing that men should have a constitutional right to avoid fatherhood. Next, Dan says even though he and his wife, Lisa, already have four children, he wants just one more. Lisa has been pregnant on and off for 11 years and says she's closed for baby business. Will Dr. Phil help Dan see Lisa's point that four is enough? Then, a frustrated husband is camping out on the roof of his house and living in a tent. He refuses to go back to his bedroom until his wife moves their kids out of their bed and starts paying more attention to him. Can Dr. Phil get him to come down the ladder? Plus, a sleep expert has a simple method for getting your child to sleep through the night. See the plan in action! Share advice and talk about the show here.

Find out what happened on the show.

More July 2006 Show Boards.

As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 3:49 pm PDT

Pregnant and a male....

Quote From: tayla69

I never heard Matt or Dr Phil mention this pregnancy was one completed behind Matt's back, or done as a secret.   

  

What I did hear was this:  

  • His former girlfriend was told she could not get pregnant due to a medical condition by a doctor
  • His former girlfriend did take birth control pills in order to prevent a birth
  • Matt used a condom a "FEW" times
  • Matt told former girlfriend he had no desire/need/presence to be a Dad at this time

   

Matt appeared to be an intelligent mid 20 year old male.  I am sure Matt knows if I DO NOT WANT TO BE A DAD, I NEED....I NEED...I NEED to ensure this does not occur.  

Matt had the choice to use TWO condoms every time he had sexual intercourse, go to a prostitute for sexual pleasure, have a vasectomy, or use his own body to give himself sexual pleasure, not involving another being.  Matt CHOSE to ASSUME the condition his former girlfriend was told she had and HER TAKING BIRTH CONTROL PILLS, would PROTECT HIM from becoming a Dad.  

   

Now I ask you, when you buy a house or a car, and the previous owner ENSURES you, that all large ticket items are ok, and will not break down, or need to be replaced...do you ASSUME this is the truth?  Or do most people in order to ensure that your house is covered for unexpected costs, or your car, etc. as a RESPONSIBLE PERSON, carry INSURANCE to ENSURE you don't have to down the line, pay out of your own pocket any large type expenses.  RESPONSIBLE PEOPLE have this mind set in all aspects of their lives.  I have taught both of my 20 something daughters, if you do not wish to get pregnant, then take the proper precautions and make sure your partner does his part too.  Have him wear 2 condoms if you REALLY dont want a baby and you absolutely cant say NO to having sex.  

   

Like many others have said on this message board, if you don't want to make a baby, keep your male making sperm apparatus in your pants all the time, get a vasectomy, or wear TWO condoms EVERYTIME you engaged in the sexual act.  This way no one gets a surprise!! NO ONE!!  

  

And for all others on this board that are saying, a woman no longer carries a "BURDEN" after the nine months......I have HIGHLY suggested to many couples, when your child is about 8 weeks or so, you the Mom, needs to go on a 7 day vacation without any phone contact with the Dad and child....then again when the child is 6 years old, and  again when he/she has a new sibling.  SEVEN DAYS AND SEVEN NIGHTS of the Dad doing it ALL...has tended to change 99% of these males attitude.   

   

Most real MEN, admit with love...that they could not do what many Moms do everyday for 21 years or more.  A career, taking total care of children (including dirty diapers and vomiting at 2:00am, 4:00am and still go to work) cooking, shopping, helping with homework and long term projects, making appts for dental care, dr visits, haircuts, buying the birthday presents for both sides of the family, buying Christmas gifts...while all he does is go to work 50 hours a week, cut the grass....and sometimes does the Sunday BBQ.  

   

So, until you walk a mile in her shoes (or for 7 days and 7 nights) dont say something you have not experienced.  

It does happen....this story I know....I do know someone who was in a non comitted relationship..he wore a condom..she went off the pill but did not tell him...he was moving and told her there was nothing they had that would keep them together...next thing you know she is pregnant and making threats to him..along with her parents...and a letter from a lawyer...making threats..after all the threats a phone call comes telling the young man to wait it out...she was also with another guy..the young man pleaded with her to give it up since he was in school and had no way of becoming a supportive father..he was not happy about the mess she was in..made it clear it was not going to happen ....she proceded to tell him she would have his money for her and the baby as long as he lived...very sad person and very miserable...the young man was wearing a condom....she had no protection the condom failed....so you are telling me he has no choice but to give into her demands...and her threats..he has no choice...I think in our state a man can give up his parental rights...for these 2 people it would be hell for them to even attempt to share custody of this child due in September......I fully agree with the young man and Lawyer on your program today..where are the rights of the man????  Anyway very long story cut short...should the male be forced into a situation not of his choice???
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 3:50 pm PDT

04/21 Baby Wars

Quote From: natvia

I listened today to your debate and as a mother and an individual I don't think anyone should pay for someones deception.  She knew he didn't want to be a father and I think it is outright selfish of her to move forward and demand he pay for her choice.  I would never expect someone else to pay for my choices and niether should she.  If she couldn't have the baby on her own then she shouldn't have had the baby.

That isn't much of a choice to make. A lot of people can't handle abortion. And once you're pregnant, you don't have a lot of options. Especially if the father refuses to be involved. All options suck!  

  

1) you have an abotion and become emotionally scarred for the rest of your life, and you might never be able to have children in the future. 

2) you give your baby up and again become emotionally scarred  

3) have the baby and try to provide for it as best u can alone or with help, and give up the next 18 years of ur life to care and provide for it 

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
happy
April 21, 2006, 3:50 pm PDT

04/21 Baby Wars

Quote From: cathlean

If we're really concerned about "fairness", we need to consider another outcome.  We have forgotten that a woman risks her life in child birth -- though not the usual outcome.  If the unthinkable happens & the mother dies, then the the father should be executed.  Somehow most men may not be in favor of that "fairness".  

Couldn't agree with this quote more!! Excellent thinking!!! Maybe MATT should be our first example of this!
 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 3:50 pm PDT

Right...

Quote From: jsberson

Men get this first big choice: unzip or keep it zipped. If the man decides to unzip, then he loses all rights to any choices if there are any consequences.

No one has any choices if they get AIDS... why should they have any choices if they have a child? Your choice to have sex means you fully understand the ramifications of your actions. So sad, too bad, you had a kid, now deal with it. You don't get to have your cake and eat it too...
 -- we used to say, thirty or forty years ago, when an unmarried woman got pregnant that "she should have kept her legs together."  We shamed her and held her fully responsible for the consequences.  We hid her away somewhere until after the baby was born and could be adopted out.

I don't see how what you're saying is any different, except that now you're applying this backward attitude to the man rather than the woman.

It's arguable that 18 *years* of payments is a much tougher road to hoe than several months of pregnancy, which when done with can be gone past and largely forgotten.  $108,000 is a lot to pay for sex by anyone's standard.  How about she give him the baby and the $500 a month?

On a related note, one of the great myths is that men don't like and won't use condoms.  The untold story is all the women out there who are trying to get men to *not* use a condom.  This pressure usually comes at a crucial point in the proceedings where the man is especially vulnerable.  Presumably these hookers (in the literal sense of the word) are quite aware that once a guy's dick gets wet he's on the hook for 18 years of child support payments.  Kinda puts a new spin on the phrase "getting lucky", no?

I hope the coverage on the show causes men to withdraw even more from women until women figure out many of us guys won't put up with being second class citizens in the area of reproduction any longer.

Perhaps some bright woman out there will even flash on the insight that men won't fight to maintain reproductive rights for women when we don't have any such rights ourselves -- other than not to participate.

That's what happens every time the abortion debate comes up.  Yea, in principle I may be firmly in favor of legal abortion, but then I realize I really don't have any stake in it one way or the other.  So don't ask me to march, right my congressperson, or vote for your candidate.  Until I have reproductive rights also.

 
User Mood
Stressed

Message Emote
upset
April 21, 2006, 3:50 pm PDT

men don't have the right to get tricked

my partner's ex-wife told him she was on birth control but lied about it, tricked him and got herself pregnant at 17.  her own mother had even sent my partner's parents a letter at the time warning them and him that her daughter told her that she had been trying to get pregant for ages.  sure enough, they broke up and two weeks later she comes back saying she's pregnant.  sure maybe he could have used a condom every time they had sex, but when you're in a relationship and the person tells you they're taking the pill, you believe them and trust them to be fullfilling that role.  

   

she woudln't get an abortion or put the child up for adoption, and forced him to marry her.  five years later they got divorced because she was just a lazy slob that never cooked or cleaned or anything day in and day out.  all of this came up during their trial.  but thanks to the biased court system in canada, he's now paying child support and spousal support for the rest of her life because she refuses to work (even part time) outside of the home (even though the child is in school fulltime) because then the child and spousal support would get reduced or eliminated.  she won't go to back school to get an education because she just wants to stay home for the rest of her life and have someone pay for it.  she even asked the judge for a maid (to be paid for by her ex-husband) as part of her divorce settlement!  even our welfare program up in canada kicks you off after 3 years if you're capable of working, which she is.  but she doesn't want to work.  to her, her kid is her cash.  and sadly her own mother has lived her life in exactly the same manner, so the daughter is just continuing the cycle.  

   

i just hope that my partner's and mine parental modeling and influence in my partner's daughter's life, and being around my two kids, will help to ensure that the cycle does stop.  i don't want her mother to influence her into tricking some guy into getting pregant and then leaching off him for the rest of her life just because she thinks that's the way to go through life.  

   

there are men out there that do get tricked by women who just use kids as a source of income.  i don't think it's fair that the men's lives have to get screwed up just because some woman tricked them.  their rights were taken away.  obviously these people weren't destined to be together if such a level of deceit existed between them.  if the women choses to be deceitful to get pregant then she should have to solely carry the responsibility of raising that child.  

   

   

 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
chillin'
April 21, 2006, 3:50 pm PDT

Condoms cost much less than 18 years of support!

I am a woman who intentionally got pregnant with a boyfriend who'd said he didn't ever want kids. After 4 years together, I suddenly had the strong desire to have a baby. I lied and told him I was on birth control. He thought he was sterile since he'd never gotten his previous girlfriend of 7 years pregnant. I knew I wanted a baby, with or without him taking part. We married a month into our pregnancy. I eventually came clean and told him that I had "tricked" him, and he knows that he should've worn a condom if he wanted to be sure. It's all said and done and you can't change the past. Fortunately for our son, he accepted responsibility and is an awesome father and friend to our now 9 year old son.  

For a guy to simply trust a woman's word is foolish on his part. Like Dr. Phil said, if you wear a condom, you're in control. They may not be 100%, but at least it's more protection that nothing at all! And a box of condoms- a pallet of condoms!- costs a heck of a lot less than 18 years of child support!   

And if you don't want to be a part of her life or your child's life, THAT is your "choice", (and your child is better off not knowing you if you're only going to resent him/her) but the law states you have to pay child support if you father a child, and I'm sure you knew that before you had intercourse. Ultimately, it's your own doing.   

Next time you play in the rain you'd better wear a raincoat!   

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 3:50 pm PDT

I feel men should have more choices

     Well I just wanted to state the I am a woman & I don't think it's right to force a man to pay child support when he has been lied to. When a woman manipulates a man & lies so she can have a child against the man's will, he should not be accountable for supporting that child if he does not wish to. Now I do think he should've used a condom no matter what she said. I think if well thought out  people could reach a common ground on this subject. I also belive that if a mother to her child has the choice to give up her rights & responsiblity to her child than a man should be giving that same choice. If giving men the same choice is the wrong way to go about it, then maybe we should take away that choice from women as well, and force women to be responsible for their actions as well! I do feel that the American society cater's to women & immagrants way too much.
 
User Mood
Angry

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 3:50 pm PDT

We need a new law for DADS!

Hello all, I am 23 years old and will be 24 in November. I have been married for 5 years now with no kids. My husband has an 8 year old child from a previous relationship. I was my husbands first girlfriend after he had broke up with his ex, and I turned out to be the wife of his future. The main reason they broke up, because they did not get married after having there child. Please stay with me, because I am making this story short and to the point. Due to my  husband and I getting married so soon, yes me being 18 at the time, and us knowing each other for only 2 years. All and all we bet the odds are still in a happy marriage. .........During this whole time the babies mother has always used the child for amo! If my husband stayed with me she would not let the child see the father, if continued to see me, the father would have to PAY MORE. She used this child for WIC, on all TAX RETURNS, MEDICAL EXPENSE, DENTAL, on a child he COULD NOT EVEN SEE. My husband tried over and over to recon with this woman, he continued to send money, and still go over to her house to see the child even if he was unwelcomed. It came to a point to where he wanted to give up his rights as a parent. He could not see his son, he could not visit him at school, and he still had to pay and hurt our current family for a big head ache of a woman. Please get the picture, that we are staying on the topic of his ex. I love my stepchild with all of my heart as if he were my own. His mother told bad stories about us, sad he was a no good dad, and that he doesn't pay for them to live!? I can't believe how far Californian governmnent, alone, lets this happen. My husband doesn't trust me to have his own child because he thinks I am going to use the child as collateral! I can't stand the fact I am suffering for her mistakes and being a horable mother, and yet my husband still have to go through the motions because he has to deal with this on a 24/7 bases until he is 18 years old, the child. My son does stay with his mother full time and there is no custody shared. She has all the control and all my husband wants to do is be a good dad. He has gone through mood swings with me, this has hurt our marriage, his pride as in being a good dad, and he as well has gone through depression. We continue to ask why do WOMAN/MOTHERS get all the law in there favor just because the child lives with them? There is no hope for good fathers out there. Especially when the mother says "Look who's cashing in this tax season!" Where do the dads go? What law supports them? And protective services really don't help out here neither. We have tried every route to get this delt with. We are to broke to take a custody trial to court. Now please America, what ARE DADS SUPPOSED TO DO?
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 3:50 pm PDT

Young Man who didn't want to be a father

I feel that these poor guys who have sex with these women who "say" they are on the pill, who are being totally deceived, should not be held responsible for a child if he doens't want to be. In fact, a law should be made that if the woman gets pregnant, a judge should decide whether or not she be allowed to keep the child without recieving child support, if the father didn't want to be a father, or, she should be made to put the child up for adoption. There have been absolutely too many young mens lives ruined because of deceiving women, and these women are not held accountable for their decieving actions. In todays family courts, the women have been getting away with ruining mens lives for too long, and yes, Dr. Phil, I too feel sorry for the children, but, if those children were to be adopted by loving parents who "want" them, there would be no reason to feel sorry for them. And if the mother can financially support the child on her own, more power to her, men should have the option of "wanting" to be parents, and supporting their children, but, not be forced. This young man's attorneys are correct in saying the woman has all the choices, and the man has none. And that's not fair. And being an unmarried man, not wanting to support a child that he didn't want in the first place, does not constitute a "dead beat Dad". There is definitely a difference between a man who is married and runs out on his wife and children, and a man who is just on a date and being decieved by the woman he's dating. In my opinion, it is these women that are committing the crimes, not the men, and the men should not bear the punishment.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 3:50 pm PDT

A fathers choice

Wear a condom.  You cannot deny your child support when you do have a child.  You have a choice - to be protected or unprotected. At the point that you decide to be unprotected you have to take responsibility
 
First | Prev | 243 | 244 | 245 | 246 | 247 | 248 | 249 | 250 | 251 | 252 | Next | Last