Message Boards

Topic : 07/06 Baby Wars

Number of Replies: 7225
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Thursday, April 13, 2006, 01:22:17 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1
(Original Air Date: 04/21/06) Being a parent is hard enough, but what happens when Mom and Dad can't agree on how many kids to have, how to raise 'em and how to get ‘em to sleep?  Sometimes, it can lead to an all-out baby war! Matt's baby battle ended up in front of a judge and made headlines. He was ordered to pay child support for the baby he had with his ex-girlfriend, but he says he shouldn't have to cough up the money because she told him she wasn't able to get pregnant, and he told her he didn't want to be a father. He, his attorney, and the director of the National Center for Men discuss the lawsuit they filed, known as “Roe v. Wade for Men,” arguing that men should have a constitutional right to avoid fatherhood. Next, Dan says even though he and his wife, Lisa, already have four children, he wants just one more. Lisa has been pregnant on and off for 11 years and says she's closed for baby business. Will Dr. Phil help Dan see Lisa's point that four is enough? Then, a frustrated husband is camping out on the roof of his house and living in a tent. He refuses to go back to his bedroom until his wife moves their kids out of their bed and starts paying more attention to him. Can Dr. Phil get him to come down the ladder? Plus, a sleep expert has a simple method for getting your child to sleep through the night. See the plan in action! Share advice and talk about the show here.

Find out what happened on the show.

More July 2006 Show Boards.

As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 8:05 am PDT

Reality Check

Here's the deal - yes men should get the same say as women - BUT where does the line get drawn?  If you say a man is allowed to decide to opt out of fatherhood if they so desire - are we giving them the green light to go out and have unprotected sex when they don't have to fear the consequences of a child to care for?  Not to mention trying to adapt Roe vs Wade to fit men...if we give men the right to choose here is the reality we as women face: 

1.  a man can walk away from a child 

2.  the man can try to force a woman to have an abortion or place her child up for adoption because that is what the father wants 

3.  if a woman doesn't want a child and wants an abortion the father would have the right to force her to carry the child full term to either place for adoption or raise. 

  

So at what point is the line drawn?  

 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 8:06 am PDT

better off without daddy

While he should be responsible financially for this baby, this guy is horrendous father material.  Spare baby Elizabeth any contact with this COLD, unfeeling individual.  I feel he would be a toxic and damaging presence in her life.  He chose not to wear a condom -- pay the price, little boy.     

 
User Mood
Lazy

Message Emote
chillin'
April 21, 2006, 8:07 am PDT

let the kid sleep

My kids are 14,13, 7 and 14 months.  Everyone of them has been welcome in our bed.  You will be happy to know they all out grow the need.  All 3 of the oldest sleep in their own beds.  There is nothing more important to a mom than a good nights rest.  If bringing the baby into your bed when he cries allows you to sleep then go for it !  If you two want to be intimate move the sleeping baby to his bed for awhile.  Dad just needs to get over it. A smart parent needs to do what works for them.  Besides before you know it they are not going to want anything to do with you. 
 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
angry
April 21, 2006, 8:07 am PDT

one more thing about this idiot

It amazes me how many children of broken homes in this country are on this message board.  I mean statistically it is more than positive that someone who defends this piece of crap comes from the home of a "deadbeat" dad.   

  

I hope that everyone understands that IF>>> this goes through in my state of Michigan court system, that your state is next.  I don't think that ANYONE who agrees with this "kid" would like to be put in the situation of this young mother.  OR your Daughter to be.   

  

It is completely strange to hear people compliment this idiots statements.  I am sooooo unimpressed. 

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 8:07 am PDT

Elizabeth's "Dad"

All choices have consequences; some more pleasant than others.  Listening to this petulant parent reminded me of what I often tell my own children..."Fair is not equal."  I'm sure that given the option, the ex-girlfriend (and just about any woman on Earth) would LOVE for him to become pregnant and be given the "gift" of the second choicepoint.  If he wants to fight disparity, the unfairness is biological, not legal.  Her biological consequence for not using a condom and trusting modern medicine that she was unable to conceive was to HAVE to face the second choicepoint.  His consequence for choosing to "trust her" and not wear a condom is to face the financial responsibility of parenthood.  Like it or not, he fathered a child.  He will never be her dad, though, and that is the ultimate consequence that this little girl, through no fault of her own, will have to face all through her life...THAT is what is not fair.  Quit whining and pay up!
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 8:07 am PDT

You can not just sign your rights over

I am new to this just like some others but I had to sign on to state, You can not just sign your rights over. People keep saying "Why doesnt he just sign his rights over?" because legally he probably can not. In the state that I live in even if both parents agree the father can not just terminate his rights and responsibilities. My 7 year old's father wanted to do this and I agreed because hes a horrible example as man anyways, he contacted attorneys, we contacted the state and it is against the law even though we both agree. The only way he would be able to sign his rights away is if another man whom i had to be married to atleast for a year would take full responsibility for her. I wouldve gladly let him because he honestly doesnt deserve to be a father with the way he treats her. As I understand it, this law exists for a reason, because the state if looking out for the best interest of the child, they dont want a bunch of children walking around saying "Oh I dont have a Dad" it exists enough already, they also dont want state weflare programs carrying the responsibility that alot of these men created by choice, and yes it was by choice... You have unprotected sex with a woman, know shes not on any birth control and then you say "Oh I dont want a baby when she finds out shes pregnant" well what did you think was going to happen when you have sex with no birth control? This case is different than Matts but she was told by a doctor that she couldnt have kids and now she is facing her resonsibilities, why shouldnt he have to as well?? Its not about either one of them, its about a baby.......  

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
frustrated
April 21, 2006, 8:08 am PDT

04/21 Baby Wars

Quote From: fluffyfat

I'm so tired of men being the villian and women the poor victim in these situations.  Would people be accusing the girl of having "unprotected sex" if she had not been taking the pill while Matt used a condom?  It's considered protected sex if one person is using a reliable form of birth control; and the pill is usually 99.9% effective. 

  

I agree with Matt.  He was misinformed if not out and out lied to by the girl about her chances of getting pregnant.   He was not given any choices down the line about abortion or adoption.  

  

It's the woman who has had all the choices, so if a she decides that she is going to have sex before marriage, not get an abortion if she gets pregnant, and not put the baby up for adoption then she should also decide to support that baby herself.  Otherwise, she just might want to [iget married[/i before she starts having sex.  Marriage is the tried and true, time honored method of finding out if a man is committed enough to a woman to bear his children. 

Well in a perfect world she would support that child herself.  But since this is real life........if he doesn't step up, guess what we will be supporting this poor innocent child!
 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 8:08 am PDT

04/21 Baby Wars

 The woman is clearly the responsible one. She chose to continue her pregnancy knowing that the father did not want any children and that he believed she could not get pregnant. She went ahead anyway with the knowledge that this child did not have married parents.  I believe that men are denied certain rights and that they deserve these rights. The guy should not have to pay child support.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 8:09 am PDT

04/21 Baby Wars

Quote From: faithserve

For those of us who are Pro-choice and believe that a woman is entitiled to make a decision whether or not she choses to become a mother at whatever time in her life should find the same common thread in the philosophy of the man who choses not to become a father at this time in his life.  It is the same argument.  He is forced against his will to become a father ... and the same would be true if Roe v- Wade should ever be overturned.  It just does not seem fair that he should not be given the exact same freedoms.  I hope he wins this legally (or brings it to popular discussion) for himself and all pro-choicers out there !  

Stacey -  

He did have a choice not to have sex. Why can no one concieve that choice. Life is not all about sex. It is great yes but your life does not end if you dont have it or use a condom take at least that much responsiblity. I mean I would not be as blown away by this if he had of at least would have made an effort. If you where a boss and you told an employee to take care of a task and he gave that task to somone else that said the would do it and it did not get done. Then your company lost a million dollars. Who would you hold responsible the person you told to do it or the person that they past it on to?
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 8:09 am PDT

04/21 Baby Wars

Quote From: jharper

That guy matt needs to get a grip on reality and stop thinking about himself. I thought it was sick how he does not want to even meet his beautiful baby girl.. how could any REAL Man do that. As the old saying goes it takes 2 to tango... She may have had problems getting pregnant but that never ruled out the possiblity of it happening.. I think matt needs to grow a pair and step up and be a real man and be a father to his baby girl.. I am not a father myself but i have alot of respect for women and their ability to be mothers and carry the child so in my opinion is yes they deserve more rights than the father.

OMG i wanna marry you.. lol 

wow. i think your one of the few and only, that actually see that it is equal that we both have choices. and that it is a lot of work to raise children. and it takes love...  

wow you have your head on your shoulders!!!!! 

 
First | Prev | 31 | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | Next | Last