Message Boards

Topic : 07/06 Baby Wars

Number of Replies: 7225
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Thursday, April 13, 2006, 01:22:17 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1
(Original Air Date: 04/21/06) Being a parent is hard enough, but what happens when Mom and Dad can't agree on how many kids to have, how to raise 'em and how to get ‘em to sleep?  Sometimes, it can lead to an all-out baby war! Matt's baby battle ended up in front of a judge and made headlines. He was ordered to pay child support for the baby he had with his ex-girlfriend, but he says he shouldn't have to cough up the money because she told him she wasn't able to get pregnant, and he told her he didn't want to be a father. He, his attorney, and the director of the National Center for Men discuss the lawsuit they filed, known as “Roe v. Wade for Men,” arguing that men should have a constitutional right to avoid fatherhood. Next, Dan says even though he and his wife, Lisa, already have four children, he wants just one more. Lisa has been pregnant on and off for 11 years and says she's closed for baby business. Will Dr. Phil help Dan see Lisa's point that four is enough? Then, a frustrated husband is camping out on the roof of his house and living in a tent. He refuses to go back to his bedroom until his wife moves their kids out of their bed and starts paying more attention to him. Can Dr. Phil get him to come down the ladder? Plus, a sleep expert has a simple method for getting your child to sleep through the night. See the plan in action! Share advice and talk about the show here.

Find out what happened on the show.

More July 2006 Show Boards.

As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 8:41 am PDT

Not an easy situation

I believe the best and easiest way to raise children to be happy, well-adjusted, and productive citizens is in a loving, committed two-parent home. 

  

If you get pregnant (or get someone pregnant) and the relationship is not going to continue, I believe there are several choices that are open for discussion:  abortion, adoption, raise the child together, or for one parent to take full responsibility while the other gives up custody. 

  

I believe it would be best for the child in this case if the courts decided to grant the "financial abortion" to this man.  He should lose all parental rights and the mother should raise the child as she wishes.  It would avoid many possible future issues that could arise if he continues to have rights because he is financially responsible for the child. 

  

The facts in this case (for better or worse) are:  There is a child.  Her mother wants to raise her.  Her father doesn't.  There is no simple answer.  I can see both sides.  What a horrible situation. 

  

Oh, for goodness sakes, just don't get pregnant in the first place. 

 
User Mood
Sad

Message Emote
happy
April 21, 2006, 8:41 am PDT

04/21 Baby Wars

Quote From: araminta

Until a man can carry a child for nine months and has the torment of the changes of a pregnancy, he CANNOT make these decisions.    

    

I find it strange, living in Michigan and knowing about this case for a while now, that we actually have people in this country that would agree with this totally careless and unapologetic "kid" and stand up with him saying that he has "RIGHTS".  PLEASE>>>>>  I am so ticked off that I could scream.    

    

How can you have sex with a woman, and NOT wear a condom in this day and age, and be so angry at the woman for getting pregnant???    

    

He should be thankful that he does not have 25 million diseases and be grateful for ONLY for a pregnancy.      

    

He guy..... Get off your "moral" and "give me MY rights" soap box.  You had sex without a condom.  DEAL WITH IT!!!    

    

WHAT A JERK!!!!  WHAT AN IDIOT!!!  WHAT A COMPLETE BRAIN DEAD FOOL!!!!!    

Amen!
 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 8:42 am PDT

Uh-Oh

Quote From: jayriddle

Oh.  Goodness.  You are correct -- I should have said that the mother-only burden is not over until nursing is complete (I do not think that formula is a good idea -- breast milk is best).

Women can point to pregnancy (and nursing, if they are committed to it) as women-specific physical burdens that men are not subjected to for a year or two after childbirth.  I guess I was being ridiculous when I suggested women-only physical burdens were over (relative to men's) after 9 months of pregnancy.  Maybe it's a few months longer than that due to nursing.  But then again......

...While you breastfed your child -- who earned the income to buy the food to feed you so you could produce that high-quality mother's milk for the child?  My best guess is that your "phenomenal provider and father" went out and worked his bum off so you and his child would be well fed at home.  Nothing wrong with that (except that the poor guy might have been emotionally distressed that he could not be home bonding with his child like you -- that's the "daddy tax" that most men bear, but which nobody wants to talk about).

The problem I have is with women who claim "women bear all the consequences" after childbirth and therefore deserve all the post-conception rights.  Men's reproductive rights just don't seem to matter at all -- because they don't get pregnant or nurse.

BULL!

Fathers are required -- morally and legally -- to support their children regardless of whether or not they intended to conceive those children.  Any woman who asserts that women deserve more reproductive rights than men because they bear a greater physical burden (in the form of pregnancy or nursing) after conception is just flat out wrong. 

It's about time people acknowledged the very real and very heavy burdens and responsibilities fathers bear after childbirth.  And it's about time we grant them rights commensurate with those responsibilities.  That would grant men -- gasp -- equal reproductive rights to women!

Women have cried out for "equal rights" in all areas for decades.  But when it's time for men's rights in one area to be equal to women's rights, suddenly "equal" is a dirty word.


Better stop the dumb bus. It looks like one of the passengers has escaped.   

   

Sir. I am fairly certain that most people on this message board believe that there is a burden on both mom and dad once a child is conceived (with the exception of dead beat dads). People who enter into parenthood obviously have shared, as well as unique, responsibilties to deal with.  

   

However, you just seem totally angry and irrational in your posts and to be so completely thick as to think that your argument derailed because you failed to add the several months of nursing onto the woman's responsibility time chart...  

   

Your argument derailed because it isn't even rational. Equality is something that is achieved on professional, intellectual, academic levels. This is not even about equality.  

   

There are places and situations that call not for equality, but for fairness, and this topic is a great example. There cannot be equality here, because the very nature of reproduction is not equal. Nature has determined that without the female womb (or a closely simulated environment, in rare circumstances), there is no new life in the animal kingdom.   

   

A man cannot ever understand the physical aspect of going through a pregnancy. You cannot even comment on this, because you have no knowledge or experience. You have never been pregnant and you never will be pregnant. So for you to spout about the equality of a man's and women's responsibilities is meaningless because it is based on nothing other than your opinion. A woman can base it on her experiences. And there is nothing that a man has experienced as a parent, that a woman hasn't also experienced, unless it be an emotional experience (daddy-daughter bonding, father-son bonding). I know many single moms that went back to work after having a child to "bring home the bacon" and provide for their child's needs - without the assistance of any man, or the government.  

   

The bottom line is that there are people in both gender pools who will take advantage and play the victim in this situation. Fairness is what we should all seek. Ultimately, the only behavior that you are responsible for is your own.  

   

So in closing, keep in mind that our bodies are not equal - the same reason that women and men play in different athletic competitions.   

   

My suggestion to  you if you want equal reproductive rights to women: Get a womb implant.   

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 8:42 am PDT

Baby Wars

If there hadn't been a discussion about children prior to this pregnancy then IMO Matt would be just as responsible as the mother, however, due to the discussion that took place stating that he didn't want children right now and the fact that she wasn't suppose to be able to conceive I don't think he should have to pay.  There are numerous cases where the woman will go ahead and get pregnant against the wishes of her partner/husband thinking he will change his mind when the baby is born.  This just doesn't always happen, men are different than women and do not have the maternal instinct that women possess.  Women need to take responsibility for their own actions and since the father is not able to share in the decision to keep, adopt or abort the baby they should not have to pay when they are straight forward and honest right from the beginning about not wanting a child.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 8:42 am PDT

No Such Thing as EQUAL

Matt's laywer said he wants the playing field to be even, but that will never be. When men give birth, we might be closer to being even, but as of right now, that is not so.  During 9 months of pregnancy a woman can not drink, smoke, travel at a point, not even ride a rollercoaster, men can do all of these while the child they helped create is being formed, so EVEN will never be. Not to mention that after the 9 months of pregnancy, the MOTHER is the primary care giver for the rest of this childs life, it does not even stop at 18. So, for this guy to try and get out of child support is crazy, even if the woman claimed she couldnt get pregnant, if he really did not want to have a baby, he would had used a condom every time, or not had sex at all. IF he does win, this will cause a slippery slope to letting dead beat dads off the hook.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 8:43 am PDT

04/21 Baby Wars

     I think it is absolutely disgusting that this young man feels as though he has the right to have sex with some one (unprotected) and then not take the appropriate responsibilities when a pregnancy occurs.  She didn't think she could get pregnant, oh well, she did.  It's time to get over it and take care of your responsibilities!  Did he forget exactly how a child is conceived?  Does he not realize that contraceptives are not always reliable?  If he was so against having a child, he should have had a vasectomy.  At least that would make more since than him trying to throw all of the responsibility on the young girl.  I am assuming he wanted to have sex and he believed that he was mature and responsible enough to have sex.  Obviously, he is not, if he can not deal with the consequences that sometimes come with it.  This just seems like another dead beat dad to me who is immature and doesn't want to take responsibility for his actions.  

 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
frustrated
April 21, 2006, 8:44 am PDT

what about the child's feelings ??

My son's father accepted our pregnancy with our son and now refuses to see him today just because it didnt work out for the 2 of us. Now my son is suffering at the age of 10 with major rejection.....Maybe we should have my son on the Dr. Phil show so that he can see a child's point of view on this??  

I hate knowing that Matt is doing the same thing to his daughter that he's never even seen! What a HORRIBLE man / father you are .....shame on you .....If this child is not good enough now then you'll never appreciate any life that you would be so fortunate to have. If you can't take care of this one you can't take care of any other one you may have. You'll need to see Dr. Phil again in the future for counselling because when that child confronts you later on in life it will not be a good feeling and unfortunately she might need it too since you are rejecting her.....Your not making her life easy or better your actually hurting your own flesh and blood.....again shame on you!   

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 8:44 am PDT

04/21 Baby Wars

Quote From: leeannt

Matt had a decision, he made the decision to use his penis without a condom.  How would anyone, doctor or otherwise know that definitively she could not get pregnant,  unless she didn't have a uterus.  He made a stupid choice and now he must be held accountable, isn't that what most people teach their children, to be responsible?     

   

I understand the whole reason for the lawsuit, to give fathers more choices but if he was so adamant about not being a father then he should have kept his penis in his pants and not put it inside someone who could possibly get pregnant.  Whats he going to say next, she MADE me ejaculate, I didn't want to???  Come on!  The sad thing is there is a gorgeous baby who will suffer through all this, he should forget this silly lawsuit and be a father to that baby.    Those lawyers should know they aren't going to win, mothers will always have the rights so this should be more of a lesson to all boys and men who are having unprotected sex.....WEAR A CONDOM!!!!!!!!  

you are SO RIght!!!!!
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 8:44 am PDT

walking the line

Quote From: wandasue

Why should he be forced to take care of  a child that he was tricked into creating?  I know that I don't want children hence why I'm on the Pill but if for some reason that failed to protect me I can and would have an abortion regardless of my partners feelings.  I do not want to be a parent.  Seeing as he was very clear on the issue from the beginning he shouldn't have to contribute at all and shame on her for forcing him too.  She knew how he felt and still proceeded to have the child hence this child is her responsibility not his.  

 I'm not so convinced he was tricked... it's entirely possible that she was told by a doctor that she could not conceive - But i agree w/ you - she made the choice to have the child knowing he never wanted to have anything to do w/ her - that decision made the baby her sole responsibility in my opinion.  And he should not be forced to support the baby.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 8:45 am PDT

Responsibility for pregnancy

 Just as I believe that a woman should be in total control of what happes to her body, I also believe that the primary responsibility for pregnancy lies with the woman. Women know that they can become pregnant and as such should insure that they won't if they don't want to have a baby. Whatever form of birth control satisfies their wish should be eimployed. Unless a man has (either raped or) promised undying love and willingness to raise and care for any offspring, a woman should expect to, all by herself,  take care of the consequences of having sex. It may not sound fair but if am a bomb, I had better make sure I don't get set off  unless I want the consequences.
In the situation on your show, the man went beyond taking normal responsibility. He had stated sucinctly that he did not want any children. If the woman did not like that and wasn't willing to take care of any consequences, she could have easily said "NO".  Are women joining the long list of those  unwilling to take responsibility for their actions?
 
First | Prev | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | 43 | 44 | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | Next | Last