Message Boards

Topic : 07/06 Baby Wars

Number of Replies: 7225
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Thursday, April 13, 2006, 01:22:17 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1
(Original Air Date: 04/21/06) Being a parent is hard enough, but what happens when Mom and Dad can't agree on how many kids to have, how to raise 'em and how to get ‘em to sleep?  Sometimes, it can lead to an all-out baby war! Matt's baby battle ended up in front of a judge and made headlines. He was ordered to pay child support for the baby he had with his ex-girlfriend, but he says he shouldn't have to cough up the money because she told him she wasn't able to get pregnant, and he told her he didn't want to be a father. He, his attorney, and the director of the National Center for Men discuss the lawsuit they filed, known as “Roe v. Wade for Men,” arguing that men should have a constitutional right to avoid fatherhood. Next, Dan says even though he and his wife, Lisa, already have four children, he wants just one more. Lisa has been pregnant on and off for 11 years and says she's closed for baby business. Will Dr. Phil help Dan see Lisa's point that four is enough? Then, a frustrated husband is camping out on the roof of his house and living in a tent. He refuses to go back to his bedroom until his wife moves their kids out of their bed and starts paying more attention to him. Can Dr. Phil get him to come down the ladder? Plus, a sleep expert has a simple method for getting your child to sleep through the night. See the plan in action! Share advice and talk about the show here.

Find out what happened on the show.

More July 2006 Show Boards.

As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 11:37 am PDT

Are you really this insecure??

Quote From: lieven

Would you say that to a woman who believed a lying man ? Uh huh. Your hate of men and your hate of equal rights is showing. 

Thanks for pointing out that you don't believe that men have rights. That you believe that men should be slaves to whatever a woman wants to do. That is, of course, sexist bigorty. Yours. 

Now, lets imagine a woman who had sex with either no birth control, or BC that failed. Who 

will call her " WHAT A JERK !!!! WHAT AN IDIOT !!! WHAT A COMPLETE BRAIN DEAD FOOL !!!! " ? 

Well, we know... not you. That further proves your bigoted hate of men, which is very common  

nowadays. Well, bigotry is still... bigotry. Even when the hated group are men. Deal with that ! 

" Her body, her choice... HER *responsibility* ! " 

I thought this whole argument was about the CHILD not wether some one is sexist!? ther is no argument in this case Matt plainly admitted to not wearing a condom, people get pregnant on birth control, and using condoms EVERYDAY, as well as peolpe who are told they can't conceive due to a medical condition, it TAKES TWO!!! the definition of conception is: the union of sperm and egg! 

so how is this one persons Fault and responsibility???? 

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 11:37 am PDT

sex causes procreation-think

 The biological reason for sex is to procreate.  If you are going to have sex, you have to accept that you may have a baby and everything that comes with it.

The only way to fully decide not to have a child, is not to have sex.

You have sex, you are agreeing to have a child if it happens.

children need both parents if they are functional adults, people need to quit copping out of their responsilbities.  Sex ed in high needs to educate kids that children are a by product of sex! and you are responsible!

 
User Mood
Worried

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 11:37 am PDT

Men are vulnerable (2)

The way things are now legally, a woman can pick a man, lie about contraception, get pregnant, cry contraception failure, and the law forces the man to pay a monthly amount from that point on. 

  

Not to mention traditional attitudes that the woman ("weaker sex") was taken advantage of, and the man should protect her. 

  

All contraception can fail, and if it happens to you, it's 100% failure. 

But this is a case where the woman betrays the trust and respect of the man, and the law helps her do that. 

  

Hope this message inspires sensitivity to man's side of this issue on the part of smart women out there. 

  

 

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 11:41 am PDT

Interesting definition of "feminist"

Quote From: filiagape

The problem with your point of view is that the law doesn't say this same thing to women. 

  

Women can spread their legs, get knocked up, and still get a second chance at making their "choice," presumably because the "feminist" decisions that allowed abortion claim, implicitly, that we're incapable of the forethought necessary to predict the consequences of our actions.  It's offensive, really, for men and for women. 

  

As a woman, as a feminist, I agree with this man. 

Men should be able to force abortion on women if they can force abortion on men. 

Men should be able to refuse child support if women force children on men. 

  

End of discussion. 

Men should be able to force abortion on women???!!!  I think the problem with your point of view speaks for itself.  

   

And no women don't "force" men to have children.  Men should realize that whenever they have intercourse, children may result.  

 

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 11:43 am PDT

Women don't run the risk, men do

Quote From: jules15

This whole thing blows my mind.....When you make the choice to get sexually involved with someone then you run the risk of assuming other responsibilities.  No matter how old you are becoming sexually active with someone is a big step.  I have know quite a few people that at one time or another have been told "You are unable to have kids"  even individuals that have had their tubes tied have been known to get pregnant.  Just because it did not fit into his plan does not mean that he should not take responsibility for his actions.  That child is his no matter what.  A man does have a choice in the matter he can state that he wants to give up his parental rights.  I work for a State Child Support Agency and have since 1999.  I have seen many things and heard many stories, there are dead beat dads and dead beat moms out there.  The bottom line to all this is that there is a child an innocent child that is a part of this world now, this child deserves to be loved and cared for.  A person would have to be heartless to act the way that he is acting.  One of these days he will have to deal with his decisions.....who knows when he actually has decided that he wants kids maybe he won't have that choice, maybe by then something medical will be wrong with him that will take that choice away.  Maybe one day he will get married and want to have kids and him and his wife will go through something glorious like finding out they are expecting and then get so far and lose the child and find out that they will not ever be able to have kids again......he needs to think long and hard before pushing this little baby out of his life.....things happen for a reason!!!!!! 

  

 You said "when you get sexually involved you run the risk of other responsibilities."

This is not true for women -- they have multiple ways to legally opt-out of parenthood after an unintended pregnancy.  Men have none of these options.  Fair?
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 11:45 am PDT

Thats Why Its Called HIStory...

Quote From: kymberley

lieven,  

  

You said that "men do the lion's share of the work that keeps society running". Well, there would be no society if women didn't do the lion's share of the work that creates society to begin with! 

  

  

No proof ever offered ? Claim fails.  

" Why are the two largest male events of recent years - Promise Keepers and the Million Man March - concerned with how men can do a better job of *giving*, while the two largest female  

efforts - NOW and the Million Woman March - are about how women can do an even better job 

of *getting* ? " Jack Kammer, " If Men Have All The Power, How Come Women Make All The Rules ? ", page 60. 

" If civilisation had been left in female hands, we would still be living in grass huts. " Camille Paglia, " Sex Art And American Culture ", introduction. 

Let us all know when women are doing 50% of all the toughest jobs that keep society running. 

By the US Census, they don't do even 10% of the really hardest jobs. 

BTW, stop by the Vietnam Memorial Wall, sometime. You'll find that 58,000 men died. Eight women, too, though none in combat. Then, go to Afghanistan, and ask around who liberated the 

women there, was it the US Army ( Men ) or NOW ? Uh huh. 

  

  

  

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
chillin'
April 21, 2006, 11:45 am PDT

it was your choice

Quote From: alleyg

Sex is fun, and sex makes babies. If you are really opposed to having children, then you should not be having sex.   

   

Yes, women have alot of power. We put out or not. We abort or not. I understand how that can seem terribly unfair. But here's the flip side. We carry the baby. We loose bone and blood for them We sit up at night while they cry. We take lesser jobs so we can spend time with them.   

   

Men do none of these things. I have been in a situation where I was on the pill and got pregnant anyhow. I chose to keep my son, how could i not, the creator himself chose me to raise him. I was young and poor and had to take state health insurance (medicaid).   

   

To get the medicaide,  I had to tell who the father was, even though he didn't want anything to do with us. I know for a fact that he has a support order against him that he isn't paying.   

   

BUT THAT ISN"T THE POINT  

   

The point is what is best for the baby. I have a child, that fact alters my life permanetly, If the guy has to pay a little child support, then so be it. But if he was so opposed to being a father, he should have gotten himself fixed. Its a quick and easy operation done in an out patient setting.  

You chose to have sex, pregnancy is a consequent for that act. Hopefully you have made better decisions since then. 

 

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 11:46 am PDT

04/21 Baby Wars

Quote From: cmford

The woman doesn't have that option. She has substantial consequences regardless of what option she chooses.  

  

I believe they both should have choices, my concern is that Matt stated she told him she could not pregnant according to the doctors, but yet she was taking birth control pills. If she told him that it was impossible for her to get pregnant and he told her he was not ready for kids, I feel she possibily did not tell the whole truth which is why she was on birth control pills, I feel Matt should have used protection too. I am not saying that men should have the right to just walk away free of any responsibility, it takes 2 to make that innocent child that pays for 2 grown adults (or so they thought they were) mistakes.  Believe me I know My son is the result of a late night oops. When I learned I was pregnant I sat and talked with this father for a long time because I was not sure I was ready for the whole motherhood thing. He convinced me he would be there for me and my son and I  would not have to go back too work he would cut back on his hours of work to be with him and so I agreed to give birth. During my pregnancy I saw his father twice a week when I was in the hospital he was there for the delivery and over the next 3 days we saw him once. Over the next six weeks he stopped by about 3 days out of the week. Then I had to go back to work he paid my sister 500 a month to watch my son I never asked him for a thing. At age 3 his father took me to court he wanted custody he lost and was court ordered to pay child support to me. He wanted more then his typical visitation of everyother weekend and one day a week I agreed again. My son is now 9 years old he sees his father for an hour or two a couple days a week and gets his over nights with him only when I am on call and its conveinant for him. My sons child support goes into its own account and supports him I don't use it at all. I am sure I have gotten off track here but my point is I beleive both parents are or should be held accountable for the child. But I also believe that woman have the power to use a child to get what they want and alot think if they get pregnant they have their man too.   

If she told him that it was impossible for her to get pregnant and he told her he was not ready for kids, I feel she possibily did not tell the whole truth which is why she was on birth control pills. 

 

We don't know if this mother lied about what she knew of her fertility.  I find it difficult to believe that anyone would intentionally want to have a child with Matt-he is such a total loser- but there are crazy people everywhere. I believe that if one of the parties has intentionally misrepresented the true facts to get sex, then I think the other person should be entitled to sue that person for damages for fraud.  

  

However,  honesty or dishonesty is irrelevant to the obligations they both have to the child. 

 

Message Emote
blank
April 21, 2006, 11:47 am PDT

No one is saying anything is "all the man's fault".

Quote From: johnwells

I see it's all the mans fault, most of the statement on hear seem to be with extreme prejuduce towards men. What about our feelings thoughts, why don't you have your uterous removed? Esentually that's what you're saying to men. It's all our fault, maybe we should just be shot and killed if we offend a women in anyway! I'm sorry but not enough men speak up about this like women do, I will give you that!

If I want be close to 100% sure I don't get pregnant, I would become sterilized, abstinent or both.  But if I were raped, I could become pregnant against my will.  

   

I don't know where your "shot and killed" hyperbole is coming from.  A place of anger?  And who is saying anything is "all the man's fault?"  

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
happy
April 21, 2006, 11:48 am PDT

On the babies side

I think that Dr. Phil hit the point right out on the head when he said this is the reason people who are not in a committed relationship who have not discussed having children should NOT have children.  The brain does not mature until a person is 25 and the last thing to do so is the piece that allows the person to see consequences for their actions.  Everytime you engage in sex you are saying this may lead to children (whether you know it or not, ignorance is not an excuse), especially if you take little to no precautions, nothing is fool proof (not even vasectomys as I know of a couple who have two children after two vasectomys).  The statement that blew my mind was the father's reply of Roe vs. Wade did not have a ripple effect to Dr.Phils question that this was going to allow more dead beat dads excuses, ......excuse me 40 million + abortions with most people using abortions as birth control is not a ripple effect..... Why Abortions Are Performed
  • The overwhelming majority of all abortions, (95%), are done as a means of birth control.
  • Only 1% are performed because of rape or incest;
  • 1% because of fetal abnormalities;
  • 3% due to the mother's health problems.

It's funny that he used the Roe vs. Wade case as the women in the suit now says that she was sorry that she contributed to the case, I think that this gentleman and his father would feel very differently if his son was dying and the future was no longer a possibility.  I am not surprised at the length that people will go to not take responsibilty for thier actions or allow their children to forfeit the consequences.  It just gets sadder every year....hope someone in these generations to come takes a stand for common sense.  It just keeps getting easier and easier for people to think they have every right to not take responsibility cause someone is not staring them in the face, or has no voice.    

 
First | Prev | 57 | 58 | 59 | 60 | 61 | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | Next | Last