Topic : 07/06 Baby Wars

Matt is absolutely irresponsible. If he was so adamant about not wanting to be a father, he had the choice to abstain from sex. What a shame it will be when that beautiful little girl grows up and learns that her daddy didn't want her! 

As Dr. Phil says, "Sometimes we make the right decision, and sometimes we make the decision right!" 

Matt didn't want to be a father, but guess what--he is. That's it. 

Would you feel this way if she wanted to "step up to the plate" and ABORT the child????  I bet not.  

What if Matt wanted the child?  Wouuld you want to give him those RIGHTS?    I have this feeling that the people backing the mother are all pro-Life.   This isn't about choice for you. 

Did that lawyer actually say that this case would not open the door for deadbeat dads to stop paying for their babies....quote  "just like a lot of people were afraid that Roe v Wade was going to mean a lot of babies would be aborted, but it didn't have that ripple effect".   HUH?????  Roe v Wade DIDN'T have a "ripple effect" (more like a tidal wave) of abortions coming after it???  This is lawyer-talk, changing the truth to say exactly the opposite.   

And he can not possibly believe that if this selfish, immature little boy gets away with saying "I didn't want it so I shouldn't have to deal with it" that no one else will use that legal precedent,  which will then put women in an even worse place economically and sociologically, and allow those men who choose to be irresponsible and selfish to put the entire burden on the mother legally.  This cannot be allowed to happen - it will be a tragedy and a crime, to the women and the children who will be born into poverty or to a life of struggle, without fathers - or who will not be born at all, because of the ability of  self-centered "fathers" to duck their responsibilites.   

men have a choice as to whether they have kids or not..... it's called abstinence. 

women have the same choice. 

he wanted to play adult games, but doesn't want the adult responsibility that comes with that decision. 

the guy is a deadbeat dad!   what a rediculously selfish child who doesn't have the brains to think through his options.  get a vasectomy! 

I can't believe that the men on your "baby wars" show actually had the nerve to show their smug, ugly faces on television, worse yet, to spout off their ultra-misogynistic belly-aching as the argument for equal rights and laws concerning unwanted parenthood!  Here's the way I see it.  The idiot donated some sperm.  She may have been dishonest about her ability to conceive, but BIG SURPRISE-women lie!!  Men lie!  How about a kleenex, crybaby?!  If I had a nickel and a STD for every time some knuckle-dragging phallus-for-brains offered up his fool-proof  vasectomy alibi as a way to go bare-back ...(HEY, THERE'S AN IDEA!  iF YOU DON'T WANT KIDS, CHANGE YOUR ABILITY, NOT YOUR MIND!)     

Who the hell are YOU to think of yourself as SO important when there's two people in the bedroom!  Losers that you are, you should not be exposing women to your gene pool.   

I do not expect my opinions to be popular. But I believe men like this, thinking like this and legislation like this are the by-product of the feminist agenda.  For decades feminism has taught through, school, media, planned parenthood, and now from the home that sex is just for fun, you don't need to be married,committed or heck even know the person. Also that you can take responsibility for your own body, and their is such a thing as safe sex, as well as the whole concept of choice. THESE ARE HALF TRUTHS with dire consequences.  

There is no such thing as safe sex, perhaps SAFER but not safe. Look at the epidemic of sexually transmitted diseases among the youth, unbelievable percentages of children born out of wedlock and into poverty. Teens are depressed, sexually active and all because they believed the lie.  

Sex is for grown ups, period. Sex should be reserved marriage, so that all people even the unborn have their future, their health and their hearts protected. I realize it's no guarantee but the divorce statistic is closely tied to this agenda as well. Men have gotten the message loud and clear -"Women can do anything a man can do and so we don't need you!" Then guess what we stand there stunned that men walk away from their families, their wives and the women they have bedded. 

We cannot have it both ways. If we want all the "choice" to abort a man's baby then by gosh we should not have the right to hound him for money. I would gladly pay higher taxes for a few decades to pay for these children if it meant that the mentality would change and women would wake and stop sleeping around and instead take pride in their femininity. We are vessels of LIFE. If a man wants to make love to us he needs to be worthy of the life that could be born from that love. And if it meant men's mentality would shift to being real men again. men with honor, men who held to their word, and walked through fire for theirs family.  

The tide is turning and eventually this horribly failed agenda will be put to rest. Maybe then the concept of family will be restored, men won't need DNA tests to know if they are the "daddy", the 4000 abortions everyday will cease and will once again value life, love and family.  

(For the record I have been a single mother, I was married at 17, I was poor, abandoned, and uneducated. I now have 3 children, have been married 8 yrs, and have learned these lessons the hard way. I work in pregnancy crisis centers, womens abuse shelters, and I homeschool my children. If you want to see the real effects of feminism get involved with troubled young women.)