Topic : 07/06 Baby Wars

This guy does not deserve to have a penis.  When you make the choice to have sex there is always the possibilty of having a child.  This should tell men that they should not be so naive to women and always should protect themselves.  How can he live w/himself knowing there is a child w/his dna out there and does not have a father.  Instead of investing in a lawyer he should have spent the money on child support for the next 10 years and hopefully by then the mom will have found another man and then he can sign his parental rights over.  I hope this man has to pay child support until the day this child turns 18!  I am horrified that a man would actually sue a woman because he is a dead beat dad and does not want to pay child support.  This baby is a huge blessing and when he does decide to have children, his children will grow up and will eventually 

find out about a sibling and if they meet this child, they will question him. Shame on him!!  

Obviously most of you who are posting messages have never gone through family courts. The only part you got right is that it is about money. Be aware that all of us as taxpayers are subsidising the child support agencies. The federal government matches dollar for dollar all child support dollars collected by the state agencies and even provides bonuses and incentives for these agencies. With that kind of financial incentive it's now wonder the "deadbeat" has emerged. Do the research, women are the big winners in family court......  

Perhaps we should consider shared parenting as our Australian counterparts have to try and level the playing field. 

Ok.. First of all.. that's not a very well thought out opinion. Going on that logic.. just for starters.. $500 a month would even pay rent. Sorry.. Lets continue.  Suppose it is a FACT that this woman lied to Matt.. which by the way, is not fact, only hearsay in the court of law. But lets pretend since that's what we are doing here, and say that she did in fact lie without possibility of being found truthful.. She produced an egg that month like most women of childbearing age do.. and that egg in and of itself would be on a feminine napkin somewhere if he had not added his sperm. You see.. without his contribution.. microscopic as it may be.. there would not be a baby.  

I also disagree that women have much of anything to do with men not paying child support. There are good men in this world.. and there are other men in this world. And if a man does not Have to take responsibility and he chooses furthermore not to have the morals to take it... he is not going to pay child support. If on the other hand he does have personal dignity and responsibility.. he will.. or even more ideally.. he wont have to because he will protect himself from making an unwanted child, along with his partner.  

And continuing on the non-factual aspect.. even if she did lie.. she is the only one who is taking responsibility. She is raising that child which he refuses to so much as touch. She is undoubtedly paying for the things that the child needs. She is giving the child love and or compassion and or bedtime stories.. not Matt.  And if it disgusts you that a woman could possibly lie.. I have a hard time understanding how a man refusing to be a M-A-N could possibly win your vote. In my humble opinion.. if one is going to have morals.. one should just go ahead and buy the whole package. Selective morals are 99% of the reason why in this country, you are given a life without work, bills, debt for committing a serious crime. Its the reason why we have homeless people, starving children, foster systems filled with babies and children who will never know a mother or a father. Its the reason we argue about things like who should win "American Idol" instead of who should be in control of our military. Quite frankly.. all of the half-way thought out opinions, in my opinion, will be our end.  

Why can't he take it back? Women have no problems getting pissy about not being able to have abortions, etc. If it is "HER BODY, HER CHOICE" then it most certainly is "HIS SPERM, HIS CHOICE" The door must swing both ways, it can't be women's choice only. He made it very clear to her that, he, in no way shape or form did he want to father her child. For her to go on and have this child and expect him to take care of the financial obligations is completely ludacris. Fight on Matt. 

Yes, Iam woman, hear me roar! 

I find it quite interesting that no one is posting to the men that have gone through something like this in the Courts and no matter what they did couldnt see their child.  Doesnt anyone have any views on this or is it just bashing bashing bashing against Matt. 

This case is about EQUAL rights, not just dealing with not being a father, but also the men that want to be a part of their childrens lives but the woman doesnt want that, someone explain how that is being equal.  This is what this is dealing with, stop looking at what is on the face, but how this can actually change, for the better, equal rights for men, dealing with everything.