Message Boards

Topic : 11/24 Great School Debate

Number of Replies: 4215
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Friday, November 17, 2006, 12:57:50 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1
Parents want the best for their children, but what’s the best way to educate them? Dr. Phil’s guests face off in a debate about whether to school, homeschool or unschool. Dana and her husband, Joe, call themselves radical unschoolers. They say education happens as a side effect of life, and they don’t believe in tests, curriculums or grades. Are their three kids learning what they need to know? Then, RaeAnn says public schools are death traps and wants to homeschool her children. Her husband, Steve, says their kids are safer at school than they are at home. Can this couple reach a compromise? Plus, Nicole feels like an outcast at 26. She says she hated being homeschooled, and couldn’t relate to other kids. Share your thoughts here.

Find out what happened on the show.

More November 2006 Show Boards.

As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 20, 2006, 8:46 am PST

What is ridiculours

Quote From: purplepenny

My husband's Aunt is an "unschooler"...her children are sharply behind when it comes to every subject...I personally find it to be a very irresponsible thing to do. Our society requires education and society benefits from it.  Not everything is learned as a side effect of living. That's ridiculous.
 Not everything is learned in school either - THAT is ridiculous. 

Think about your life - what you learned in school, what you learned at home, at church, with friends, while travelling.  How much of what you learned in "school" has helped you?  How much  has hurt?  (I have friends who only learned they were "stupid" at school because they were late readers and the lack of confidence has haunted them to this day, I learned that the secret to success was being great at taking tests - got me through school but didn't help much when I tried to suceed in the real world).

Our school systems were designed to produce factory workers - (really) and they do that remarkably well - but in the world of the future we are going to need all sorts of different kinds of people with all sorts of different skills.  We need people who learned both traditionally and non-traditionally - some who are motivated self learners that come from an unschooling background, some with a strong spiritual core that were christian homeschoolers, some with a personalized more traditional HSing background, some from elite charter schools, some from public schools - the mix of different ways of learning is very important.  No one way is right and no way is "ridiculous" because there is no possible way that any one type of schooling can produce the "perfect" education for all.

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
hopeful
November 20, 2006, 8:48 am PST

I don't think you get it

Quote From: julie1418

 I know that statistically home schoolers do much better both academically and socially.

 

Those statistics are largely invalid. In terms of statistical research, validity refers to the extent to which a study measures what it is supposed to measure. You have to be able to eliminate all possible variables that may effect the results. In most educational studies, it is very difficult to control all the variables.

 

When measuring the success of home schooling, not all home schooling families are required to participate. It is almost exclusively the ones who are doing a bang up job who participate in the research. It makes the data extremely skewed and it does not really measure whether or not the homeschooling is responsible for the success or the fact that those parents are so dedicated to their children. You cannot with any certainty attribute to success to the homeschooling as those students would probably do well in ANY educational setting. In fact, studies that separate students first by socioeconomic factors ( parents' income and education level) and THEN by schooling show that public school children tend to outperform both private school kids and home school kids.

 

Thank you for your manners and etiquette. Using either the literal or implied meaning, your statement is incorrect because NOT all home schooling parents are those who 'truly care about their child's education'. If you had read my entire post, I explained that many parents grow frustrated with the public school system because they resent being told the truth - that their kids are undisciplined and unmotivated. They get tired of being called when the child will not behave or when he refuses to learn. So they pull their kids out of school to avoid the reality that they are NOT doing their jobs as parents. These are the kids who don't show up on your statistics.

 

Bottom line, a parent is the child's first teacher, and I believe the most important.

 

I am in agreement there!


I read your entire post and see that all you did was spout the negative attitude that  most "professional educatiors" have about home schooling.  Again I can not speak for every homeschooling family, but in every case that I know of you are incorrect in your assumption that parents resent being told the truth.  Our kids are not all undisciplined and unmotivated.  The school system has failed some of our kids.  The more I tried to work with my son's teachers the less the school wanted to work with our family.  When he could not do simple basic math he was told he was not smart enough to learn it, and was just passed along.  When he was labeled with displacia (a form of dyslexia where they write backwards instead of reading backwards) he was told he would never learn to write; and that was ok as long as he learned to use a keyboard.  As a parent it was unacceptable to me for them to give up so easily.  If my son truly was unteachable I would have not had a problem.  My husband and I taught him how to write,do math and science, social studies, etc where the school did nothing.  He scored higher on the college placment tests than the average public school student from our area.  At age 16 he graduated from his home school high school course and was accepted into college.  Parents income and education level have little to do with children's success.  I was a single mom until 3 years ago and I managed to work full time and educate my child.  Of course I can not speak for every home school family in the world, I just know of the thousands of families in our homeschool co-op.  If the parents are not doing their jobs as parents, they will probably not be interested in making the commitment to homeschool.
 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 20, 2006, 8:53 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: unschools

I would also think you would have to be pretty financially sound and have much flexible time as a family to do it well. >>>>>>>>> Just wanted to respond to this as well. We're an unschooling family. We're also a low income family allthough we're now in much better shape financially then a few years ago when we began to unschool. I think if we sent our kids to school I'd HAVE to work. Between school fees, supplies and clothes we'd be sunk.
Yes, there are many things in school that are more expensive  than people think.
When my own children attended public school, the supply list alone came to $60 per child, and this was  with "shopping for deals".  Being able to educate my own child means I get to choose when to buy certain supplies :)  While in August all the parents are clustering that aisle, I get to nab up all the quick-sale items in late september, getting binders, loose-leaf, pens, pencils, and what not for a fraction of the price of what people who buy the supplies in season pay.

We live in a large suburban neighbourhood, and our children's friends are mostly public school students.  Outside of a school environment, they are free of the fashion police, the name brand police, the toy police, the technology police, and they just get to enjoy each other's company at realistic prices that mere mortals can afford.  It's relaxing and life is stressful enough without having the headache of worrying if they have all the right things to keep up with the Joneses.



 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 20, 2006, 8:54 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: omgwhocares

How do you know that they are behind?  Are you somehow testing them? 

 

Unschooling does not mean a lack of education, it is merely a name for a way of learning.

How do I know they are behind? They write sentences like kindergartners. They talk like like toddlers in many ways. The one girl who is 13 can barely do basic math.  All 5 of them (from two different families) have almost no attention span.  Their vocabularies are very limited.


 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 20, 2006, 8:58 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: omgwhocares

George Washington
Thomas Jefferson
John Quincy Adams
James Madison
William Henry Harrison
John Tyler
Abraham Lincoln
Theordore Roosevelt
Woodrow Wilson
Franklin Delano Roosevelt

 

All these presidents were unschooled and voted into office.

 

And when was the last time any politician touted their elementary school or highschool education.  I would doubt that you would even know if someone had been unschooled, unless they told you. 

 

Seems like you don't really understand what unschooling is...


 

No and we are trying to figure it out. But it's like pulling teeth. So far I've seen a lot of defensiveness and snide answers...but very little explanation.
 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 20, 2006, 9:03 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: sneakers145

Thing is, always-unschooled children are already enrolled in colleges around the country and are doing well.  Some are enrolled in advanced degree programs.  One of the unschooler moms on a list I'm on just announced her son's SAT score of 1410, and he'd never been to school.  Unschoolers are succeeding in life.  

 

Unschooling not just a flimsy idea that parents of young children are trying as an unproven experiment and we're all doomed to failure and dumping our ignorant children on the overburdened school system when we realize that education is better left to the 'professionals'.

 

Unschooling works.  Unfortunately, there is no way to define it, or quantify it, and explanations don't quite cut it.  And when you look at it from a schoolish frame of mind, it seems silly, insane even.  But basically our children and families live as if school didn't exist.  And when you step outside of the box, there's a whole wide world waiting to be explored.

 

Check the links I posted earlier.  A wealth of information there, far more than can be explained on a simple message board.  Especially one with a bias such as this.

Yes..."unschooling" isn't  the only situation where parents teach their kids "outside the box"...my parents taught us about the speed of light, gravity and other scientific ideas at home for fun. We went to public school. So what you are proposing so far isn't unique to "unschooling"...as a matter of fact a lot of people I know have parents who teach their kids in everyday situations.

I am talking about more advanced sciences and math concepts. I'm talking about forcing kids to read books for the literary value that they might not WANT to read at first.

PLEASE keep in mind, I am not attacking you and other "unschooling" parents...please....I am trying to UNDERSTAND. But the level of defensiveness is very very high and it seems to be blocking out your ability to teach us what it is you believe in.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 20, 2006, 9:08 am PST

The Great school debate

I believe the key to our childrens education is the parents. I am a former public school teacher, who then taught at a Christian school,  who now homeschools my children. I saw parents who cared and parents who didn't care in each of these environments. In public school I had parents who had the belief that the government provides these schools for the children so teach my kids I don't have to be involved. And in disipline matters when we would ask for help we would be told that we are with the child all day so you fix it. I also had parents who worked with their kids at home, the childs homework was always done, they asked questions of the teachers, and they were concerned about any issues brought up by the teacher.  In Christian school I had parents who had the philosophy that I pay you to teach my child so you do it. And on the line of disipline issues I pay you so you fix it. I also had wonderful parents who again made sure homework was done they cooperated with the teachers and volunteered whenever possible. And homeschooling. I had one child who I tested for placment into my 3rd grade class. He had been homschooled up until this point and should have been in the 3rd grade however he tested at a kindergarten level. Over the next year we saw why. All homework would come in in moms handwriting if it came in at all and anytime there was a disscussion with mom she had excuses of what was going on. I also know of wonderful families who homeschool. Their children are well educated, and attend church, sport, dance and other activities that socialize them well. Most of these children are well socialized not just with 20 other kids their own age but with kids their age, kids older and younger than them, and with adults. There is not one right answer out there.  But the key is for the parents in all situations to have concern, and be involved with their childs education.
 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 20, 2006, 9:10 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: spiralweave

 Not everything is learned in school either - THAT is ridiculous. 

Think about your life - what you learned in school, what you learned at home, at church, with friends, while travelling.  How much of what you learned in "school" has helped you?  How much  has hurt?  (I have friends who only learned they were "stupid" at school because they were late readers and the lack of confidence has haunted them to this day, I learned that the secret to success was being great at taking tests - got me through school but didn't help much when I tried to suceed in the real world).

Our school systems were designed to produce factory workers - (really) and they do that remarkably well - but in the world of the future we are going to need all sorts of different kinds of people with all sorts of different skills.  We need people who learned both traditionally and non-traditionally - some who are motivated self learners that come from an unschooling background, some with a strong spiritual core that were christian homeschoolers, some with a personalized more traditional HSing background, some from elite charter schools, some from public schools - the mix of different ways of learning is very important.  No one way is right and no way is "ridiculous" because there is no possible way that any one type of schooling can produce the "perfect" education for all.

I have actually learned most of what I know on my own. But, I am a grown woman with discipline and I sat down and read on the topics I wanted to learn about.

I also learned a lot in school.

I am FOR homeschooling in some situations. Again, the level of defensiveness here is deafening...it makes it very hard to have a conversation with people who are ready to attack any questions or comments.

I am simply stating that the "unschoolers" I know are very very very behind in what they should know. Some of the kids have vocabularies that are barely more advanced than my 2 and a half year old's vocabulary.

Their parents are very much convinced that they will learn all of this in their own time, but I am skeptical...that is all. VERY skeptical.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 20, 2006, 9:12 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: sneakers145

Did you read the original post? I asked, in very simple terms, if there was any other form of assessment other than anecdotal? I made it VERY CLEAR that I didn't know enough about unschooling to be for it or against it. What I received in reply was an immediate statement that a lot of people are uncomfortable with unschooling and a huge defense against assessment. I think the implication was pretty clear.

 

Um, that's not quite true.

 

Here's the exchange:

 

Julie said:  I do not know enough about unschooling to support or dispute it, but I am wondering something. Other than your own observations, how do you KNOW your children are doing well and are going to be ready for the adult world and gainful employment? I am not suggesting that they won't, I'm simply wondering if there is any other form of assessment other than anecdotal.   I answered: 

Unschooling challenges people's beliefs.  I doubt no matter what I or any other unschoolers say on this board will change anyone's mind here.  But I'm sure we'll make you think. :) 

 

How do I know, without testing and grades and such, you mean?  Without external evaluation?

 

Let me ask this before I answer:  How do you know YOUR kids are doing well and are going to be ready for the adult world and gainful employment?  Do you rely on their grades?  Assessments by teachers?  What?

 

I see my kids in action every day.  My daughter, when she was 10, held a job at the barn mucking stalls and feeding horses in exchange for extra riding time.  She comes to work with me and is helpful to my clients when they walk through the door.  She can use a computer better than I can, including programming with html.  She currently runs an online store, though it deals with points instead of cash.  I see what she's learning and what she already knows in the questions she asks me.   Because I talk with my kids about everything and anything.

 

My son is only 8 but he's the master of tenacity.  He'll do whatever he sets his mind to do in life.  No doubt about that.  Because he already does.

 

Riding instructors, skateboard camp counselors, grandparents with education backgrounds, other parents have all commented on the maturity and poise of my children, along with being awed by their knowledge base.  They may not have the exact base their public schooled peers have but they have breadth and depth in the knowledge they do have.

 

No doubt in my mind whatsoever.  Plus, I have the benefit of knowing other lifelong unschoolers and seeing them get into college or succeed in business that i harbor no doubts about my own kids.

 

Why do people feel that external assessment is so important? 

 

Julie said:  It wasn't a combative question, I don't really think it warranted such a defensive answer. You aren't going to get many people to understand the dynamics of unschooling if you refuse to give concrete answers.

 

I said:  Combative?  I gave you an honest, thoughtful answer. 

 

I think unschooling makes a lot of people very uncomfortable, as it goes against what conventional wisdom tells us.  That kids can grow up and become productive members of society WITHOUT school.  Without honors.  Without transcripts.  It means that what you've been taught and believe isn't 100% correct.

 

****

You didn't read my honest, thoughtful answer to your question.  Nor did you answer my questions.  Do you really rely on external evaluations to know how your kids are doing?  I'm curious.

 

You ask, I've answered honestly and without animostity.  You apparently perceive that I'm hostile, defensive, and combative, which couldn't be farther from the truth. 

 

I don't have goals for my kids.  My kids have their own goals.  I don't decide which experiences that facilitate learning.  We just do cool stuff.  Whale watches.  Indian museums.  Aquariums.  Candle factories.  Glass blowing.  In addition to the usual stuff:  computer games, playstation, maps, National Geographic, Discovery Channel, K'nex, music, etc.  All of it sparks interest and creativity.  Some of it gets explored in far more detail than others.  Right now both are focused on communications -- reading, writing, and computer coding.

 

You seem to think that a person of age 18 has mastered every subject and stands on the precipice of life, 100% prepared to step forward and meet any goal they set.  If at 18  my unschooled child decided to go to college, then they'd study and take the SATs, see what requirements they need in addtion to what they've done, and they'll go.  College isn't something that one needs to decide to do at the magic age of 18.  It will be there when they're 22, 25, or even 35.  I know a radiologist who now wants to be an architect.  And off he goes.  People change their minds all the time in life.  To me, a college degree in accounting is useless if you want to work in the theater designing sets.

 

 

We are going to have to agree to disagree as to the tone of your responses - I don't need an entire recap.

 

As far as your questions to me. My children are 3 and 2, so it's a bit early to say. I think I most likely want a combination of ways to determine if my children are learning adequately. I don't think standardized tests are the be all and end all, but I'm not sure I trust simple observation - even my own observation.

 

You seem to think that a person of age 18 has mastered every subject and stands on the precipice of life, 100% prepared to step forward and meet any goal they set. 

 

 

I have no idea where you got that impression. I remember being 18 although it was quite some time ago. It is simply the age where most students are getting ready for college. I DO want to know that when my children are of college age, they will be able to pass the exams needed and succeed in college level courses. I agree that people can start college at any age, but I don't want my kids financially dependent on me when they are 35!

 

To me, a college degree in accounting is useless if you want to work in the theater designing sets.

 

You are going to have to explain that one. My accountant will disagree!

 

 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 20, 2006, 9:13 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: winterwarmth

What I don't think has been made clear are some things about what eclectic homeschooling and/or unschooling does not mean.  Unschooling does not mean a child will never "take a class", or read a textbook about a subject.  Unschooling does not mean a child just "runs wild". A parent's job is still to be the parent, the facilitator, the guider, the person who enables the child to learn both the good and the bad.  Whether homeschooling, unschooling, or whatever the course of education, the bigger picture, the main goal, is to give a person the tools to know how to LEARN, as opposed to being spoon fed facts for short-term satisfaction of a teacher or guardian.

I hear questions all the time about "how will the child learn math?", well, to answer that, one would have to ask the question, "why are these subjects taught in schools in the first place?"  I mean, surely there is a reason that math and social studies, science and what not are taught, right?  There must be more to it than the idea that they have to satisfy a teacher.  They're expected to take that knowledge home and use it!  It's supposedly developmentally appropriate.  It's supposed to prepare them for the "real world".

The idea that math (or any subject) is only "available" in schools and not teachable in life
 is a long-believed myth.  There is so much in the real world that encompasses many "subjects".  Articles in the newspaper, for example, which capture my children's interest often prompt them to get a book out, or explore via other media (magazines, the internet, etc) on the subject and explore it further, be it history, biology, mathematics, sports, current events, politics, world religions, literature, or whatever ideas come up.

We are eclectic homeschoolers because we believe that knowledge pursued is knowledge retained.  We all have subjects which hold our personal interest for which we seek more and more knowledge outside of the classroom.  The same is for students.

Calculus and higher math are obtainable for those who have an interest in it and wish to pursue it.  If they find it challenging and fascinating, there are many careers for which knowing calculus is a requirement.  However, I know many successful people who are whizzes at English lit, yet who need a calculator to balance a check book.  But, they are successful in their chosen field of study. 

Adults get to choose what they pursue, and when they choose it, they pursue it because they *love* it or have an aptitude for it.  They also learn it when their minds, for whatever reason, are ready to receive and retain the knowledge.   Children deserve the same right, to be exposed to all there is out there, yes, but to also be allowed to embrace and focus on their interests.  Not everyone is good at the same thing at the same time, regardless of where one is educated, be it home, school, cave, Mars.  To expect everyone to uniformly know the same things with the same deadline is unrealistic.  That is why there are so many fields of interest out there.

This is in no way intended to knock public school teaching.  My hat is off to public school teachers.  It is a tremendous job, and I would never knock the hard work of a dedicated teacher.  To impart knowledge to 20 or more passing acquaintances is challenging.  Many relatives of mine, and even some who homeschool/unschool, are teachers by profession, and it is a different job to raise a classroom full of students than it is to raise
one's own children and loved ones.

Public school is, when you think about it, a relatively young insititution, compared to the vast number of generations who were expected to teach and prepare their own for the world.

Please forgive the length of this post.  This doesn't even begin to cover the aspects of homeschooling which would require a whole other mindset to understand.  Here is an article which explores it further:
http://naturalchild.com/guest/earl_stevens.html

Well your attitude is different than the "unschoolers" I know. The "unschoolers" I know simply think that everything you need to know you will learn as a side effect of living everyday life.

So far, from what I can see, that method fails miserably.
 
First | Prev | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | Next | Last