Quote From: penny_ladyOh, I do think that parents have the right to educate their children that way too. But I am just saying it does them a disservice.
"Besides, I believe the vast majority of scientific career choices would
not be effected either way by this one lesson. I have an online friend
who is agnostic and works in a lab studying different viruses. The
vast majority of the people working along side her are Christian, some
of whom believe in creation. There are many fields in which this just
isn't an issue." These people probably partition their minds. Many scientists do. They have a spiritual side, and a scientific side. Viruses mutate, they evolve, they are susceptible to selective pressures...not only that, selective pressures are USED to make organisms do certain things. 40% of scientists are theists...but nearly all, except a few, understand evolution and accept it.
A good book that illustrates this kind of partitioning is "Finding Darwin's God" by Ken Miller. He is a Catholic and he is also a Biologist at Brown University.
"And when I say "theory" I am speaking as to the basic sense of the
word. It's a theory because we honestly don't know what happened."No, of course not, but we do know with reasonable certainty, based on evidence that Evolution is the explanation for the variety of life on this planet.
But you are using the word theory incorrectly in this sense. The word "theory" in science means (to borrow words from a friend):
A
theory is a concept that attempts to explain a grouping of facts; it
doesn't have a negative connotation that suggests it is just some
dubious, random idea. Gravity is also a theory and just like evolution,
it will never be defined as a fact.
The word "theory" in everyday use is very different and this causes confusion.
"We're all making really good guesses and someone may just be right.
Personally, I think it's a bit arrogant to think we actually know how
all this came about. But, that's just me. ;)"Arrogant? No, not if you understand the theory. Really. I used to be a creationist, I studied evolution so I could strengthen my arguments against evolutionists. What I found was that Evolution is a very solid theory that is, in laymen terms is a fact, in scientific terms, a sound theory with no competing theories.
Also, another misconception. The Theory of Evolution doesn't have anything to do with how life started. It has only to do with how life evolves. What you are talking about here is the theory of abiogenisis.
Also, another misconception. The Theory of Evolution doesn't have anything to do with how life started. It has only to do with how life evolves. What you are talking about here is the theory of abiogenisis.
Right, I understand. I'm speaking specifically to the "origins of life" lesson which seems to be the main focus of the article's author. He seemed to be very against the fact that some homeschoolers teach creation.
But you know there are many varying religions and as such many varying stories. (I believe it was you that brought up the many different religious versions. Have you studied any of them? They can be quite fascinating.)
I have noticed, and I'm sure you did as well, there are also different scientific theories about the beginning.
I believe (as do my children) that evolution is constant. But I don't buy into the big bang, creation or many other beginning stories.
These people probably partition their minds. Many scientists do. They have a spiritual side, and a scientific side. Viruses mutate, they evolve, they are susceptible to selective pressures...not only that, selective pressures are USED to make organisms do certain things. 40% of scientists are theists...but nearly all, except a few, understand evolution and accept it.
I'm sure if and when there is an issue (which I can't imagine is too often) they do "partition their minds". I believe many doctors do the same.
Arrogant? No, not if you understand the theory. Really. I used to be a creationist, I studied evolution so I could strengthen my arguments against evolutionists. What I found was that Evolution is a very solid theory that is, in laymen terms is a fact, in scientific terms, a sound theory with no competing theories.
Well, yeah... arrogant. LOL, please don't take it the wrong way. I'm not calling everyone arrogant. I should have worded that more delicately. In my opinion things such as the beginning of life and God are possibly too big for us to comprehend right now. Science is constantly improving itself with new discoveries which sometimes prove old thinking false. I just don't think we're at a level in which we can say these things for certain. Perhaps after more evolution of the human mind we will be capable.
Or, conversely religion. I will try to say this tactfully and I really mean no disrespect to anyone at all. I'm just telling what I believe. ;) I believe it is a bit arrogant to assume we know a God's intent, will or thought process. I believe the up most arrogant example is when people claim to speak for God. Also, I believe it is a bit arrogant to believe we can request favors from a God. (For example, "God, we come to ask you to watch over little Johnny and keep him in your hands tonight. Lord he needs your strength to fight this cancer battle...... ")
Like I said, these are just my beliefs on these issues. IOW (which means In Other Words) please feel free to believe anything you want because I'm not trying to influence your thinking. I'm just..... sharing. :)