Message Boards

Topic : 11/24 Great School Debate

Number of Replies: 4215
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Friday, November 17, 2006, 12:57:50 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1
Parents want the best for their children, but what’s the best way to educate them? Dr. Phil’s guests face off in a debate about whether to school, homeschool or unschool. Dana and her husband, Joe, call themselves radical unschoolers. They say education happens as a side effect of life, and they don’t believe in tests, curriculums or grades. Are their three kids learning what they need to know? Then, RaeAnn says public schools are death traps and wants to homeschool her children. Her husband, Steve, says their kids are safer at school than they are at home. Can this couple reach a compromise? Plus, Nicole feels like an outcast at 26. She says she hated being homeschooled, and couldn’t relate to other kids. Share your thoughts here.

Find out what happened on the show.

More November 2006 Show Boards.

As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 21, 2006, 11:36 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: winterwarmth

You're welcome.
I wish you the best as you consider your own family's needs.

Thank you. You as well, as being a parent is an ever evolving process...LOL

My daughter is only 2 and a half, I teach her everyday...if she goes to school or stays with me, either way I will be involved in her education. I want to give her a solid runway to take off in live with and I think the best way to make that runway is knowledge.

:o)

Again, thank you.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 21, 2006, 11:38 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: fredastare

I agree that the government is not a magical power.  I did not imply that in my posts........I am simply stating that there needs to be an accountability for all students.  Regardless if they are home schooled, unschooled or publicly schooled.

 

I don't want the government's nose in my business any more than it already is.

Ha Ha!  I agree, although in living in a democracy it really is the governments business to have it's *nose* involved with all aspects of the nations undertakings.

 

My bottom line remains as such, I feel that EVERY educator should be held accountable in that the very best interests of the child are being met.

 

Fredi

 

 

 Held accountable by whom!! The Government!!!!!! Like they know whats best...HA! Since when do a bunch of different people whom you don't even know can make decisions for my children. I don't think that is what democracy means. That would be more communistic. Its the parents responsibility to do what is best for their children....
 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 21, 2006, 11:40 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Aimeebella wrote:
Would Dr. Phil argue his point so much if the parents sent their child to a school in an alternative setting? The point is, this is America and we do have choices. They may not be your choice but it is our right and freedom.
 

Not that I needed anyone's "permission" as such, I felt very validated by my choice to go the eclectic route when I came across a private elementary school (can't remember where) that is set up similar to how I choose to, which basically was an "educationally rich" environment in which children got to pick and choose what they did.  It even cost a pretty penny in tuition.


 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 21, 2006, 11:43 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: aimeebella

I never thought I would homeschool before becoming a parent. In fact, I didn't know homeschooling was really an option. I now have a 6 year old daughter and a 3 year old son. My 6 yo went to preschool for 5 months when I pulled her out. We were spending money on an education that was way below her level. Not only that, I was frustrated with the teacher's attitude and didn't think it was worth the effort and money to be annoyed all day, every day. She had been exposed to many extracurricular activities already by 3 years old. She had been to swimming, dance, gymnastics, music, art, baseball camp, Vacation Bible School, etc. I continued doing what I always did with her - read and teach her to read. By 4 years old, she could read and now at 6 she has read more books than many adults have in their whole lives. She is on her 5th Harry Potter book in the series. We homeschooled her for kindergarten and moved from NY to NC in April, which would have really been disruptive if she was switching schools like that. We had to move again from one area of NC to another so that would have been even worse.

 

My husband was fine with homeschooling her for preschool but he wasn't crazy about the idea for kindergarten but he soon realized she was so way ahead of the game that she would have been bored. However, he made me agree to put her in first grade. I reluctantly agreed hoping that he would change his mind. 1st grade came when we were in NC and we registered her but I informed everyone I could of her situation. I was in contact with the principal, the person in charge of gifted education and the teacher. The most she was ever allowed to read was Amelia Bedelia. They kept telling me that she was being challenged. Now, I am not saying she did not like school. She is a very sociable girl and she loved that aspect but how could I justify her getting "socialized" in 1st grade when she was not in the least bit challenged. We ended up pulling her out after a bit over a month when we realized that it was going nowhere. Now she has book club, a homeschool group, Girl Scouts, Communion classes, etc. We work on reading at her level. She has free reading time to read her Harry Potter and her Charlotte's Web for the second time. She reads to her brother and is teaching him how to read too. We don't "do school" everyday but she is responsible for science projects and reading assignments. She has to finish a certain amount by a certain time and we set goals to achieve them. She knows all about Ancient History, the Revolutionary War, the Colonial Period and is now learning about the Medieval Period. She scored a perfect score on the CAT test for the end of 1st grade last month and I'm sure she would get at least a near perfect score for the end of 2nd grade as well.

 

My point is, how would she be better off in public school? She sees her friends often but she is not as easily influenced by the trends and fashions. IMO, she is a bit young to worry about that. She can be pursue more of her passions because she can explore. Not everyone is made to homeschool, just as not everyone is really made to parent. We all make mistakes but so do teachers and schools. In the end, many parents are doing what they feel is best. Look at the educational system in the US compared to many countries. We are not #1 in most things anymore. We can't brag about how great schools are. I do know there are many. Just as there are many great teachers but there are also many great parents that chose homeschooling. What is right for one does not have to be right for everyone.

 

Would Dr. Phil argue his point so much if the parents sent their child to a school in an alternative setting? The point is, this is America and we do have choices. They may not be your choice but it is our right and freedom.

I think the biggest difference between the US and other industrialized nations is that we simply do not, as a culture, value education like many other cultures do. Sadly, whether we want to admit it or not, we value people who entertain us and people who can make money. I do not mean this as that is what each individual values, but rather our nation as a whole.

 

I have no idea how to fix this, but I believe the only way we are going to improve as a country is to develop a culture of education. Less of Brittany Spears and more Nobel prize winners and the such. From what I have learned on this board about the unschooling concept, the more I realize EVERY parent needs to be doing a healthy dose of it regardless of whether they send their kids to traditional schools or not. We need to change our values, and it MUST start with the parents.

 

 

On a side note, did your daughter's school not have an accelerated reader program. I taught language arts in a school with students of varying abilities (non-English speakers to college level readers) and I was able to get everyone reading using this program. Some sixth graders were reading Are You My Mother while others read John Grisham, etc.

 

 

 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
November 21, 2006, 11:52 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

to unschoolinmom who wrote

"I am never going to argue that schools are without problems, but I am SICK of schools being blamed for social problems. If EVERY parent did nurture their child's love of learning in those crucial years, schools would be able to function better. I know there are exceptions, but for the most part, parents who have engaged with their children and helped them get excited about learning do not usually have problems in school settings. They may have some complaints, but their kids are usually not floundering. I have very little concern about putting my children in a traditional school because I KNOW what I am doing at home to make the difference."

 

On the contrary, many schools are ill-equipped, due to bureaucracy among other issues, to deal with children who don't fit the norm at either end of the spectrum.  In our district, there is no high ability testing until 4th grade  - lots of time for children to get very bored and turned off learning if they are high ability.  I've even heard people (some teachers) say that children should be discouraged from learning to read at an early age so that they will fit in and not get bored in school.  SO, how can one nurture learning and not have an out-of-norm child? 

 

By their very nature, public schools (magnets accepted) are designed to suit the average child and it takes work and $ to suit those outside a "normal" range -  probably a reason why many parents of children termed high ability or GT are choosing to homeschool and private school in increasing numbers. 

 

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 21, 2006, 11:56 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: sneakers145

 

As a former educator, let me assure you this is a HUGE myth.  

 

Not totally a myth, though I see where you're coming from.  I have an insatiable curiosity and always have.  Yet when I got to school, all excited to learn, I was constantly told by teachers, "Oh, we'll cover that next year."  Or, "Yes, but that's too in depth for what we're discussing."  Or "You want to take what?! class?  But you're college prep!  You can't take any Vo-Ag classes."  Or, from my peers (the glares and jeers) "Shut up, will ya?"  Because they don't want whatever additional stuff the teacher might say in response to my question put on the test.

 

So, I did what lots of the smart kids do.  I sat down, shut up, did what was expected of me, made the Honor Society and was totally bored out of my freakin' mind.  OTOH, my ex-husband, a totally smart geek, did the opposite.  He did the minimum, got bad grades, and bided his time til he graduated.  Our nephew, also quite smart, was labeled ADHD because he constantly thought outside the specific directions the teacher wanted him to do his work by.

 

I have seen TOO many children who walk into Kindergarten completely unmotivated to learn.

 

 Many children are not being nurtured in the quest for learning before they hit school. Their questions to What and Why  are often answered with Not Now, Sit Down and Shut Up.  Their development is not only neglected but trampled before they ever walk through the school doors.

 

And this is a social issue.

 

I am never going to argue that schools are without problems

 

And I'm not ever going to argue that radical unschooling is for everyone.  What I do know is that when nurturing the love of learning in those early years, it spills over to the rest of our childrens lives.  School, therefore, becomes an obstacle to learning for my children, because of the time away from home or activities, homework (which I personally feel is a waste of time) and an intrusion on family time. 

 

Not totally a myth, though I see where you're coming from.  I have an insatiable curiosity and always have.  Yet when I got to school, all excited to learn, I was constantly told by teachers, "Oh, we'll cover that next year."  Or, "Yes, but that's too in depth for what we're discussing."  Or "You want to take what?! class?  But you're college prep!  You can't take any Vo-Ag classes."  Or, from my peers (the glares and jeers) "Shut up, will ya?"  Because they don't want whatever additional stuff the teacher might say in response to my question put on the test.

 

I also was a voracious learner. If I had an interest that wasn't covered in school, my parents helped me pursue it. Our house looked like a giant library and we took lessons in everything, even if it only held are interest for a year or so.

 

The problem with this scenario is that almost ALL parents will claim that their kids are failing school because they are not challenged enough. For some, that is true. It was easier for me as a Language Arts teacher to provide more meaningful reading or writing for the truly gifted child. However, many of the kids were simply unmotivated. It was difficult for me to agree that they were not challenged enough when they could barely write a sentence in sixth grade. They had simply learned not to try anything remotely frustrating and their parents would come to the school and argue their case for them. Maybe homeschooling would have been a better option for them, but I seriously doubt it, and their parents wouldn't have done it anyway.

 

I do feel for the Calvin (of Calvin and Hobbs) type kids because they really do not FIT into a school structure. There isn't an easy answer as teachers have to give grades and must be accountable. Don't even get me started on the over diagnosing of ADHD!!

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 21, 2006, 12:03 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: benoliver

 Held accountable by whom!! The Government!!!!!! Like they know whats best...HA! Since when do a bunch of different people whom you don't even know can make decisions for my children. I don't think that is what democracy means. That would be more communistic. Its the parents responsibility to do what is best for their children....

Beno, if you had neighbors who claimed to be homeschooling, yet you KNEW all they were doing was watching TV all day, would you feel compelled to do nothing? Are you okay with that because parents can decide what's best?

 

I KNOW that is not the case for the majority of homeschoolers, but I know of two instances just in one year. I do NOT advocate nit-picky regulation, and I don't have all the answers, but I don't think SOME level of accountability is such a bad thing. The basic skills tests most schools give are NOT rocket science by any means. I have trouble imagining why any parent would have a problem with their child taking a test. Or if they really are opposed to tests, submitting a portfolio.

 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
November 21, 2006, 12:06 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: benoliver

 Held accountable by whom!! The Government!!!!!! Like they know whats best...HA! Since when do a bunch of different people whom you don't even know can make decisions for my children. I don't think that is what democracy means. That would be more communistic. Its the parents responsibility to do what is best for their children....

Its the parents responsibility to do what is best for their children....

 

I couldn't agree more with that statement.  Unfortunately there are many parents that are not responsible in doing what is best for their children.

 

I'm sorry if my view that there must be some sort of umbrella of protection for children is upsetting for you.  The only answer that I can come up with is in government monitoring and yes holding it's citizens accountable for their actions.

 

Again I am NOT against homeschooling at all.  I feel that every poster here is making the very best decisions in how they choose to educate their children.  My only concern is the parent that is not able to properly educate their children.

 

How do we keep that child from falling through the cracks without a specified regulations? 

 

Fredi

 

 


 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 21, 2006, 12:09 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: purplepenny

(I have a preemie daughter too, although she wasn't negatively impacted by it in anyway other than being skinny at first...LOL)

When I said "sharply behind" in my original post I was talking about basic writing and talking skills.  From what I or anyone knows of she has no learning disability or any other mental or physical reason for being behind. She just doesn't enjoy reading or writing as she is not challenged by her parents to go outside her comfort zone in reading and writing.

Unschooling might be great for some kids, but this girl, IMO, needs to be pushed and directed. She's a teen and writes like a 3rd grader.

 
Well, my preemie is still a skinny minnie, but she's sharp and quick.  She essentially taught herself to read, and knew "multiplication" because she's got so many family members  (e.g. Me: "give each person about 5 slices of green pepper please" her: Oh, you mean I need to have 30 slices?") before reaching "school age".

I don't know this girl you are referring to personally.  But you seem to.  Unschooling doesn't always involve, nor by default even mean "not directing".  Directing is part of parenting, separate from what method they use for education. 

Not to be contrary in any way, as I do hear your concern for this girl.  I don't know enough of the situation to comment on it, but it begs the question: What is she defining as "unschooling", and b) why is she behind? and c) is she needing to use her writing for anything pressing?  I read many newspaper editorials and articles that my 3rd grader could easily have written, passing off the idea that freelancing for a newspaper must be a piece of cake, when I know the opposite to be true.

I would like also to suggest the idea that there are some instances where a person's mind needs some down time from things they find difficult or beyond their grasp.  Sometimes constant nagging, cajoling, bribing, rewarding, can get to a person and they don't really want to work at it.  I know for myself, when I've given certain subjects a "sabbatical", it is with eagerness and renewed vigor that I pick it up when the mood once again strikes me, and I see said subject in a new light.  I'm not just talking as an adult.  I found this to be true in my childhood as well.


 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
November 21, 2006, 12:21 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: mammato4boys

What if the government began monitoring all parental activity for the "best interests of the child" would you agree?

 

I would agree.

 

Wow, I am surprised. I'm not trying to question your decision but allow me to ask a few questions. You would actually be okay with a government agency entering each home in America that contains children, reviewing all parental decisions and deciding if they up to state standards?

 

As far as the whole Foster Care scenario you implied about, I can't see that happening.  Yet I am grateful that there are laws and agencies in place (albeit not perfect ) in order to protect children.

 

See, I gave the foster care scenario because IMO it is the equivalent of what is being proposed for homeschoolers. I agree with you that our society needs to have laws and agencies in place to protect children. However, these laws must be balanced and not intrude on all privacy. IMO, it would be absurd to allow the foster care agency to enter every  home in America, review all parenting decisions and rule as to whether that decisions were according to the state's standards. Sure, we would catch a few bad apples but would it be worth intruding on the privacy of everyone else?

 

Perhaps I don't agree because I believe strongly in personal accountability. IMO, alot of people count on the government to do things which are not needed. I believe in taking responsibility for our own actions and not expecting the government to do it for us. Does that make sense?

 

The silly laws I am referring to are laws such as the no child left behind. I have heard many educators explain why it does not work and why it actually hinders the education. What is your take on it?

 

In a democracy it is up to the government to ensure the highest quality of education for our children.

 

Not trying to be snarky but don't you think the government should fix the government schools before they begin working on other schools?

 

I do understand your point of view and I appreciate the fact that we have been able to communicate effectively.  I understand and agree with your feelings of protecting our children. But homeschooling has been proven to work time and time again. The vast majority of homeschoolers are doing a terrific job. It would be a pitty to scrutinize a group because of a slim few who are not doing well. KWIM?

 

 

You asked me if I would be in favour of the government monitoring parental activities for the *best interests of the child*.

 

Yes anytime a child's best interests are considered, I would agree. 

 

I can't imagine the govt. having either the time, manpower or resources to enter every home in order to conduct parental investigations.  Just look at how overloaded the CPS is right now.

 

You would actually be okay with a government agency entering each home in America that contains children, reviewing all parental decisions and deciding if they up to state standards?

 

Although like I stated above I can't see this happening, I would be okay with it.  I have nothing to hide.  But that's a whole other can of worms really.  It may fall under invasion of privacy etc.  So no........I don't think it would be a good thing.  Yet personally wouldn't bother me, so long as the *inspectors* were on top of there game.

 

 

Perhaps I don't agree because I believe strongly in personal accountability.

 

I do too.  Unfortunately there are many parents that don't believe in their own accountability.  I mean it's a sad fact yet very very true.

 

Not trying to be snarky but don't you think the government should fix the government schools before they begin working on other schools?

 

I feel the government should be multitasking to address all aspects of all educational settings, whether they be private, at home.......or public school settings.   Certainly there is room for improvement in all the above situations.  Otherwise we'd cease evolving and bettering a child's education regardless of the options.  * And no, you did not sound snarky   ; )

 

I hope this helps.  I must take off for now, therefore please don't think that I'm avoiding any response.  I will look for any further questions at a later time.

 

 

Fredi

 

 

 

 
First | Prev | 32 | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | Next | Last