Topic : 11/24 Great School Debate

Number of Replies: 4231
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Friday, November 17, 2006, 12:57:50 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1
Parents want the best for their children, but what’s the best way to educate them? Dr. Phil’s guests face off in a debate about whether to school, homeschool or unschool. Dana and her husband, Joe, call themselves radical unschoolers. They say education happens as a side effect of life, and they don’t believe in tests, curriculums or grades. Are their three kids learning what they need to know? Then, RaeAnn says public schools are death traps and wants to homeschool her children. Her husband, Steve, says their kids are safer at school than they are at home. Can this couple reach a compromise? Plus, Nicole feels like an outcast at 26. She says she hated being homeschooled, and couldn’t relate to other kids. Share your thoughts here.

Find out what happened on the show.

More November 2006 Show Boards.


User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 21, 2006, 12:37 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: winterwarmth

Well, my preemie is still a skinny minnie, but she's sharp and quick.  She essentially taught herself to read, and knew "multiplication" because she's got so many family members  (e.g. Me: "give each person about 5 slices of green pepper please" her: Oh, you mean I need to have 30 slices?") before reaching "school age".

I don't know this girl you are referring to personally.  But you seem to.  Unschooling doesn't always involve, nor by default even mean "not directing".  Directing is part of parenting, separate from what method they use for education. 

Not to be contrary in any way, as I do hear your concern for this girl.  I don't know enough of the situation to comment on it, but it begs the question: What is she defining as "unschooling", and b) why is she behind? and c) is she needing to use her writing for anything pressing?  I read many newspaper editorials and articles that my 3rd grader could easily have written, passing off the idea that freelancing for a newspaper must be a piece of cake, when I know the opposite to be true.

I would like also to suggest the idea that there are some instances where a person's mind needs some down time from things they find difficult or beyond their grasp.  Sometimes constant nagging, cajoling, bribing, rewarding, can get to a person and they don't really want to work at it.  I know for myself, when I've given certain subjects a "sabbatical", it is with eagerness and renewed vigor that I pick it up when the mood once again strikes me, and I see said subject in a new light.  I'm not just talking as an adult.  I found this to be true in my childhood as well.


"Well, my preemie is still a skinny minnie, but she's sharp and quick.  She essentially taught herself to read, and knew "multiplication" because she's got so many family members  (e.g. Me: "give each person about 5 slices of green pepper please" her: Oh, you mean I need to have 30 slices?") before reaching "school age"."

My Emma has caught right up! LOL...She's in the 82nd percentile for height now! LOL and the 64th for weight...LOL...she didn't stay small for long! That's awesome about your daughter.. I see Emma heading down the same path. I use every moment I can find to teach her something. Or to reinforce something she already knows.

As for this girl I know, her parents definition of unschooling seems to be very hands off. Maybe that's the difference.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 21, 2006, 12:43 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: julie1418

Beno, if you had neighbors who claimed to be homeschooling, yet you KNEW all they were doing was watching TV all day, would you feel compelled to do nothing? Are you okay with that because parents can decide what's best?

 

I KNOW that is not the case for the majority of homeschoolers, but I know of two instances just in one year. I do NOT advocate nit-picky regulation, and I don't have all the answers, but I don't think SOME level of accountability is such a bad thing. The basic skills tests most schools give are NOT rocket science by any means. I have trouble imagining why any parent would have a problem with their child taking a test. Or if they really are opposed to tests, submitting a portfolio.

if you had neighbors who claimed to be homeschooling, yet you KNEW all they were doing was watching TV all day,

 

But this is a slippery slope here, because on occasion *I* watch TV all day, and so do my kids.  But it all depends.  We have unlimited TV (right now it's rarely turned on).  We have unlimited computer time.  Right now my kids are on Neopets a lot.  Yes, they're having fun, but there's a boatload of learning going on there as well.  Primarily reading, writing, math, and geography, time zones, etc.  But we travel, work, have play dates, go camping, museums, and all that good stuff, too.  But some weeks, if some nosy neighbor were spying on us, they'd claim we watched tv all day and there was no learning going on.  But TV is very educational.  Sets, writing, lighting, props, characters, actors, Hollywood, and that's before we even get to the music from the shows, bands, cultural references, etc.  Then add in the history channel, discovery.  We learned about labor unions one day on Sponge Bob Squarepants...

 

I disagree with regulation of homeschoolers for the main reason is once they start, they won't stop, and before we know it they'll be dictating curriculums and having us teach to the test.  No thank you.

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 21, 2006, 12:45 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: fredastare

Its the parents responsibility to do what is best for their children....

 

I couldn't agree more with that statement.  Unfortunately there are many parents that are not responsible in doing what is best for their children.

 

I'm sorry if my view that there must be some sort of umbrella of protection for children is upsetting for you.  The only answer that I can come up with is in government monitoring and yes holding it's citizens accountable for their actions.

 

Again I am NOT against homeschooling at all.  I feel that every poster here is making the very best decisions in how they choose to educate their children.  My only concern is the parent that is not able to properly educate their children.

 

How do we keep that child from falling through the cracks without a specified regulations? 

 

Fredi

 

 


Unfortunately there are many parents that are not responsible in doing what is best for their children.

 

And that's where DCF steps in.  If they investigate and find the complaint without merit, it's done.  If there really is neglect going on, they'll find out.  But to regulate all homeschoolers because there *might* be some parent using it as an excuse to hide neglect is not a valid argument.

 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 21, 2006, 12:48 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: benoliver

 Held accountable by whom!! The Government!!!!!! Like they know whats best...HA! Since when do a bunch of different people whom you don't even know can make decisions for my children. I don't think that is what democracy means. That would be more communistic. Its the parents responsibility to do what is best for their children....
What if I decided I wanted to teach a wacky-ass form of Darwinism in my home and I decided it best that I do not interfere with "natural selection" if my daughter does something dangerous, like grab a pot by the stove, or run out into traffic or put if she puts a plastic bag on her head.

What if my thinking, as a mom, is that if she cannot survive these things she should go on to procreate anyway.

Should the government intervene then? I mean, I AM her mom, I DO know best right?
 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
November 21, 2006, 12:51 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: mammato4boys

Hey Julie, we agree. :)

 It is not the problem of the public school (entirely) that children are not doing well. It is the parents responsibility to ensure their children succeed in their education. I really do feel for teachers at public schools. There are too many students per teacher, too many parents who do not care, complete lack of discipline options, tests to teach to, etc.....

 

The pregnant kids, sexually mature kids, terroristic kids those are all wonderful examples of why my children are not in the public school system.

 

I understand why you would look at a parent who is obviously not parenting and suggest they should not homeschool their children. But honestly, they are not the ones who are homeschooling. Homeschooling takes patience, complete devotion, lower income, and dedication to name a few things. Generally speaking, the parents who aren't involved with the public school system are not the parents who homeschool. Perhaps one of those types of parents would try homeschooling. But, I'm pretty sure if they are that non-interested in parenting they will certainly not stick with homeschoooling.

In the interest of those reading to learn, there are some statements in the above post with which some homeschoolers would disagree

 

Homeschooling takes patience - yes as does all "good" or "real" parenting beyond the biological mechanisms

 

Complete devotion - whoa there, what do you mean by this?  sounds like being a slave to one's children - not necessary for homeschooling. One can raise one's children to be more trustworthy and independent all the time- mor eso with homeschooling where it is not necessary for kids to passively wait for learning to start on someone else's schedule.

 

Lower income - again misleading.  Yes, if you see the only way to homeschool as one income producing 40 hour/week parent and one homeschooling parent.  With flextime, telecommuting and other workplace options, not to mention the increasing number of entrepreneurial parents, homeschooling can work wihtout lowering (or in some cases) even increasing income. 

 

Let me explain: Some parents find that quitting a 9-5 job which they may have kept to send the kids to private school or provide the fashion/toys and other items kids in schools see as necesstites due to peer pressure means they now have time to start or expand a part time business or hobby and involve their kids.  My kids 6 & 8 know how to answer a buisness phone, take a message and what business means.  They have "sat in" on a business meeting(socialization),  they help fill out bank deposits, (math) take inventory(critical thinking), desgin logos,(art) address envelopes (penmanship), proofread my marketing(grammar), etc.  Yes, they have formal lessons and worksheets, but they also have relevant chances to exercise the skills learned there.   

 

dedication, no argument there.  discipline/organization  would be another requirement

 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
November 21, 2006, 1:01 pm PST

Open your heart

I homeschool out of love for my children. Public school is no longer a safe place for my kids. It is a problem that just keeps getting worse and until the govornment does something to improve the quality of the schools in this country, my kids will continue to be taght at home where I can protect them like a mom is suppose to. I know where they are and what they are doing at all times. I know their friends and the people the play with. To me I would rather see my kids grow up and be alive to have kids of their own, then in public school with a shortened life span just so they can be social!!
 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 21, 2006, 1:02 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: purplepenny

"Well, my preemie is still a skinny minnie, but she's sharp and quick.  She essentially taught herself to read, and knew "multiplication" because she's got so many family members  (e.g. Me: "give each person about 5 slices of green pepper please" her: Oh, you mean I need to have 30 slices?") before reaching "school age"."

My Emma has caught right up! LOL...She's in the 82nd percentile for height now! LOL and the 64th for weight...LOL...she didn't stay small for long! That's awesome about your daughter.. I see Emma heading down the same path. I use every moment I can find to teach her something. Or to reinforce something she already knows.

As for this girl I know, her parents definition of unschooling seems to be very hands off. Maybe that's the difference.
Our daughter isn't "below average", she's on there somewhere, but she's just a naturally petite child, and we love her to bits.

Yeah, my own definition is not entirely "hands off".  Parenting is not a "hands off" operation, I mean we have to feed them, clothe them, guide them, seek help when they're sick, etc.  I feel for those who believe that "unschooling" is "hands off", especially for those who feel the need to apply it with their own children.

I often say that it's "hands off" in my case, but when I really dig down and think about it, it isn't.  Parenting is about sharing and guiding, and offering a piece of yourself to their lives.  At times that might mean saying, "I don't care if you don't feel like it, put your coat and shoes on and come with me!  We're going!", or "Yes, I really want you to do NaNoWriMo this year." 

People can't live in the same house comfortably without sharing opinions and offering feedback, etc... it's not even really a part of parenting, it's just the basics of coexistence with another person!  I'd not feel too comfy around my husband if we never exchanged ideas or shared anything with each other.

I hope your friend's daughter will eventually have a desire to write more.  Perhaps something will strike her fancy and she'll pick it up.  I have a friend who graduated highschool, and she gave it an honest go, but writing and reading are her weaker subjects.  She's going on to get an early childhood degree (a career she will excel in, she used to mind my own children on occasion), but even though her writing is not college level, she can communicate effectively and that works for her.  (She even took some courses outside of school to improve her writing - it did help her quite a bit, but it's still not her best subject).

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
chillin'
November 21, 2006, 1:04 pm PST

Homeschooling

Quote From: kschmittz

My husband and I are very "concerned" with our children's education, therefore, we moved to a higher end area with good public schools.  My oldest son is 8 and in 3rd grade.   He is almost a year younger than most of the other kids as their Moms kept them back a year.  He is doing above average work and not having any issues.  I think there is A LOT of mis-understanding about public schools.  First, in my son's class there are LESS kids than the average area's private schools.  Next, there are boudaries set by the district on w hat they can teach your child that do not exist in private school.  In private school (I found this out after we checked out private schools and from a teacher) they can teach whatever they see fit.  Also, it is up to the parent to be involved in their child's education.  If you see your child is struggling in any way, then go to the teacher and work something out.  Public school has a multitude of programs to assist you and with the "NO CHILD LEFT BEHIND" there's really no excuse (learning disability or whatever) to not have your child succeed.  We have what is called a 504 plan for my son.  Basically, it is a legal document that will follow him through High School.  I can dicatate (if need be) every move/action the teacher makes in regards to my son.  It is NOT that way now but the option exists.  This is available to all parents at any public school.  Last, I can claim all you do about my son's public school.  That is why we are "dishing out the money" to live in a nice area.  Therefore, the crime and bullying you speak of really isn't an issue where we live.   If it does happen, then my son will take care of it with help from his Dad and I.  I think a lot of people are very mis-guided about not only private school but homeschooling and unschooling as well.  Part of education is not just academics.  There is so much more.  In today's world, there is very little chance for self-sufficiency without a decent education.  Also, you need to have skills beyond that.  If you can't deal with people or situations that may come up in life (like bullying) you are not likely to have a lot of job offers.  In a public school setting, although not perfect, there is much more to learn on a social level.  You learn to wait your turn, respect others and that there are consequences for your actions that can affect your whole class.  Anyone who thinks the majority of private schools kids are perfect, think again.  When I was young, these were among the most wild of us all.  They just had the $$ to get out of most any trouble. 

 

All in all, a good education can come from a good public school.  I agree, not all are good.  There are some even in my district I would not send my kids to.  That is why my hubby and I are very careful if we decided to buy another house in this area.  We want to make sure we stay within school lines that we like.  Also, if a parent expects the school to teach everything to their child then they are in error.  I am in my son's class every week helping out.  No, I am not  Room Mom every year but I am there.  I have been on Field Trips and helped out with parties and such.  I consider myself lucky to be able to do this even though I work full time.  There is academic education which I believe needs to be done by people who are qualified- someone with teaching credentials. For what it's worth, I also believe anyone who homeschools/unschools should have these same credentials. Then there  is the other edcuation which is about life.  This is up to parents. 

 

Last, don't assume every kid in public school has parents who don't care.  Just as you assume this there are people who assume things about you and your choices.  You are not the only parent who is involved in your child's life the way you are.  I have many many friends who are teachers in public schools and I can tell you they are far more trained than anyone realizes.  They are concerned and they do teach every child no matter how big their class is.  Also, in public school in 1st and 2nd grade the class size has to be UNDER 20 kids...again lower than most private schools.  My friends also say their biggest battle is not teaching the kids but dealing with parents.  Food for thought. 

First I would like to say that I am glad for you that you are able to live in a nice neighborhood and spend a lot of money to send your children to the "best" schools. I am not as fortunate. I live in the heart of Philadelphia, Pa. I WILL homeschool my child. She is 2 and she is already learning a lot.  I am very proud of her. You mentioned about the No Child Left Behind. All that means to me is even is a child is failing in school they will not keep the child back and make them repeat that grade. So These children are our future and they will not be able to read or write because the public school system just pushes them right through. Also most children who are diagnosed with ADD or ADHD are being done in the public school system and they have to be put on medicine and I don't think that is the solution to the problem and there is a book that you can only get from Amazon.com called The harsh truth about public schools. Get the book and read it it will open your eyes to just how bad the public schools are. Just my opinion.
 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
November 21, 2006, 1:06 pm PST

homeschooling and testing

Quote From: julie1418

Beno, if you had neighbors who claimed to be homeschooling, yet you KNEW all they were doing was watching TV all day, would you feel compelled to do nothing? Are you okay with that because parents can decide what's best?

 

I KNOW that is not the case for the majority of homeschoolers, but I know of two instances just in one year. I do NOT advocate nit-picky regulation, and I don't have all the answers, but I don't think SOME level of accountability is such a bad thing. The basic skills tests most schools give are NOT rocket science by any means. I have trouble imagining why any parent would have a problem with their child taking a test. Or if they really are opposed to tests, submitting a portfolio.

As a homeschooling mom one of the problems I see with the current testing is that it only tests a certain curriculum.  e.g.  my 5 y o adds and subtracts, using a plus sign and a minus sign.  The tests, geared to ps curriculum use "some, some went away" ,and "some, some more" stories.  He could well fail such a test even though he does math 2 years above his age level, because he wouldn't recognize the verbiage. For an adult i twould be like reading a recipe that said "saute" and while you darn well knew how to "pan fry" you had never heard "saute"  my guess is dinner is going to be a bit late!

 

Now, if the school district to which I pay taxes wants to offer either of my kids the chance to take an IOWA skills, or Stanford achievement test - yeah!! Those tests are not curriculum geared, but are widely respected and allow a student to test beyond their nominal grade level.  Currently,  I would have to pay to have them tested in my state - so, if you want accountability, many (not all) homeschoolers would be happy to avail themselves of the opportunity - but I have yet to hear of any district offering such testing on a voluntary basis- again, in my state.  

  

 

 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
November 21, 2006, 1:10 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: sneakers145

if you had neighbors who claimed to be homeschooling, yet you KNEW all they were doing was watching TV all day,

 

But this is a slippery slope here, because on occasion *I* watch TV all day, and so do my kids.  But it all depends.  We have unlimited TV (right now it's rarely turned on).  We have unlimited computer time.  Right now my kids are on Neopets a lot.  Yes, they're having fun, but there's a boatload of learning going on there as well.  Primarily reading, writing, math, and geography, time zones, etc.  But we travel, work, have play dates, go camping, museums, and all that good stuff, too.  But some weeks, if some nosy neighbor were spying on us, they'd claim we watched tv all day and there was no learning going on.  But TV is very educational.  Sets, writing, lighting, props, characters, actors, Hollywood, and that's before we even get to the music from the shows, bands, cultural references, etc.  Then add in the history channel, discovery.  We learned about labor unions one day on Sponge Bob Squarepants...

 

I disagree with regulation of homeschoolers for the main reason is once they start, they won't stop, and before we know it they'll be dictating curriculums and having us teach to the test.  No thank you.

But TV is very educational. 

 

We learned about labor unions one day on Sponge Bob Squarepants...

 

TV is a huge money making machine.  Unless it's on PBS, the information you are getting has been put out there because think tanks at various networks have decided it will suit their demographic, and they will respond to the corresponding advertising.

 

Sneakers, the fact that Sponge Bob Square Pants has ANY say in your children's education is disturbing.  Really.  He's pure entertainment, and possibly a social commentary...but educational?

 

Yikes. 

 

Marie

 

 

First | Prev | 33 | 34 | 35 | 36 | 37 | 38 | 39 | 40 | 41 | 42 | Next | Last