Message Boards

Topic : 11/24 Great School Debate

Number of Replies: 4215
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Friday, November 17, 2006, 12:57:50 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1
Parents want the best for their children, but what’s the best way to educate them? Dr. Phil’s guests face off in a debate about whether to school, homeschool or unschool. Dana and her husband, Joe, call themselves radical unschoolers. They say education happens as a side effect of life, and they don’t believe in tests, curriculums or grades. Are their three kids learning what they need to know? Then, RaeAnn says public schools are death traps and wants to homeschool her children. Her husband, Steve, says their kids are safer at school than they are at home. Can this couple reach a compromise? Plus, Nicole feels like an outcast at 26. She says she hated being homeschooled, and couldn’t relate to other kids. Share your thoughts here.

Find out what happened on the show.

More November 2006 Show Boards.

As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 22, 2006, 3:41 am PST

Why do we homeschool?

  Well, there are a myriad of reasons...

First of all, I had wanted to homeschool, because I liked the idea of families staying together, since I found out I was pregnant with my first child.

When one is noticeably pregnant, seemingly one is free to receive well-wishing "advice" from strangers (wink).  One that stuck with me, was, "Better enjoy them while you can, because when they turn 5, you don't get much time with them, anymore, and they grow up so quickly!..."  It didn't stick with me then.  I just smiled and moved on.
.
Time went on, I remarried and had more children.  I had my children in school for a time.  Then, while unpacking a box, I saw all the literature I had before about homeschooling, the pros and cons, "how to" do it, etc... and a flood of memories came back to me, including that kind "better enjoy them while you can" woman.  Reading those books re-awakened my dormant goals.  Also, there were other personal circumstances which seemed to fit.  So we made the decision 5 years ago, and haven't looked back.

I started questioning things that we take for granted.  Things such as the default of families not being together during "school hours".  We take that for granted.  We wake up, one or both parents head to work, and kids spend their best and most energetic hours with someone else.  When a parent is seen in public with their child during "school hours", the question is "Oh, do you have a day off school?".  It's perceived as odd or unusual,  that at certain hours of the day, children over a certain age are with their own parents, or with other children but not in a school.  The epiphany hit me like a ton of bricks.

I also felt retroactively gypped, given that as parents, we "get them" during the most physically exhausting times (for parents) of their lives, the diaper years, the chasing toddler years, the times when their physical abilities are not quite aligned with their sense of reason (grin).  Then, precisely at the age when they turn more "fun", and require no more babying, but still are young and relate-able, they're sent off to someone else!

So now we don't deal with that anymore.  Many people who don't understand homeschooling perceive homeschoolers as people who tend to isolate their children.  Well, for me the opposite is true. 

When I think about it, they were more isolated when they were in school.  They came home from school, and the first thing was, "Mom, can I go over and play at (name of friend's) house?".  Sometimes I would allow them but other times I'd resent that here they spent all day somewhere else, and STILL didn't get "time with their friends?" (And school is supposed to be this social Utopia).  When do we as parents get to see them? Bedtime? Supper time?  When it's time to nag them to finish their homework?.  Yeah, evenings (if I'm lucky) and weekends.  Gee, Thanks.

How can a parent be "so involved" when it's largely remotely?  Get in line while the teacher deals with the other parents who just want "5 seconds" of the teacher's time?  Write a note?  Don't teachers get a break off school hours for their lives or do they have to spend all their time after hours reading notes and responding to them?

Well, now that they are home, I'm more inclined to let them go visit friends, do other things and be gone for sleepovers, because my time with them is not ripped off.  We get quality time, interactive learning time, and the time I spend with them is not when they're tired from being in school all day, but when they're open and receptive.  So yeah, when you look at it that way, they're less "isolated".  They interact with not only me, but with a myriad of people through their lives.

Anyway, this post is already long, but yet it only covers a fraction of the reasons we homeschool.  But I thought the family thing is a big one, which is not often addressed.  More often it's the "socialization" and "university readiness", and I don't want to reinvent the wheel.
 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 22, 2006, 3:49 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

homeschoolma wrote:
"The first misconception I will address is that homeschoolers spend too much time with their family and not enough time with their peers.  The amount of time that a child needs to spend with their peers varies from child to child."

Indeed you are correct.  I addressed this in my "why I homeschool" post, which I posted here and on the general "homeschool" board.  Also, what our society defines as "too much", and my own, when it comes to family time, are two completely different realities.

For me, I find now that they are not in school, I am more inclined to let them spend time with their friends.  I've also (more easily than if they are school students) been given the luxury of getting to know who their friends are, and feel more confident and secure in letting them "go".  I didn't have between the hours of 7 and 3 to miss them, so yes, I get more time with them and they get to spend more time doing other things they like with other people they like.  It's "win-win".

Also, yes indeed, children do have different thresholds for what they can tolerate with regards to being dumped in a class with people who only have in common their birth year, at most.  For me, I liked people, as a child, but there were times when I was flooded with people and just wished I could be left alone - heck, even 20 minutes would have sufficed.
 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
November 22, 2006, 4:32 am PST

Homeschooling vs Public School

I am a former homeschooler.  My children are now in the public school system, but it is not by choice.  It is because I had no choice due to working.  I want the best for my children, and at this moment the school system can give them more structure than I can (after working 8hrs a night and then sleeping 5hrs).

BUT..with that said, I don't think the debate that has been going on here is fair.  First of all, Dr. Phil chose a homeschooling family for the show, that from what I can see from the previews, is NOT a typical homeschooling family.  At least not in my area.  Most, and I stress the word Most...do not unschool.  They do not allow their children just to do whatever they want.  My children had a set schedule (yes some homeschoolers would cringe at this), and we did every subject using a textbook, or lesson plans that I made using various resources (Internet, Library, etc).

I expected my children to complete their work, I corrected their work, and spent extra time on a subject when they struggled.  They were not allowed to run around and do whatever they wanted.  I had very high standards for my children, and even in public school I have high standards.

There are good and bad homeschoolers just as much as there are good and bad teachers, administrators, and public schools.  When you are faced with a broken system, and you truly do want the best for your children, homeschooling is a fabulous option, if you are capable.

I don't regret homeschooling, I wish I could still be doing it.  But I think by choosing the family that Dr. Phil did, he is fostering the misconceptions that are out there.  Shows like Law and Order also show misconceptions based on one homeschool family in the news.  You don't here about the other 1+ million homeschoolers because they are too busy educating their children.  Yet they suffer the consequences of these misconceptions.

It is a discriminatory thing to lump all homeschoolers together, just as it is to say all African Americans ................, or all Jewish people ....................., or all Irish ............................

Discrimination or lumping people together based on a stereotype is wrong.  No matter who you are.

I get compliments all the time on my children's behavior, work ethic, etc.  So I feel that as a homeschooler, I did a fabulous job.  And if you don't agree with my decision to do it, that is fine, you don't have to.  This is America.

 
User Mood
Excited

Message Emote
blank
November 22, 2006, 5:11 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: amberlyn1

When a grouchy queen tells her layabout son that it's time for him to marry, he sighs, "Very well, Mother.... I must say, though, I've never cared much for princesses." His young page winks. Several unsatisfactory bachelorettes visit the castle before "Princess Madeleine and her brother, Prince Lee" appear in the doorway. The hero is smitten at once. "What a wonderful prince!" he and Prince Lee both exclaim, as a shower of tiny Valentine hearts flutters between them. First-time co-authors and artists de Hann and Nijland matter-of-factly conclude with the royal wedding of "King and King," the page boy's blushing romance with the leftover princess and the assurance that "everyone lives happily ever after." Unfortunately, the multimedia collages are cluttered with clashing colors, amorphous paper shapes, scribbles of ink and bleary brushstrokes; the characters' features are indistinct and sometimes ugly. Despite its gleeful disruption of the boy-meets-girl formula, this alterna-tale is not the fairest of them all. For a visually appealing and more nuanced treatment of diversity in general, Kitty Crowther's recent Jack and Jim is a better choice. Ages 6-up.

It really had parents up in arms here in Massachusetts when a teacher read it to her Kindergarten class without informing parents first.  It may just be a fairy tale, but it introduces themes many parents do not want their 5 year-olds exposed to.  Heck, even the publisher's info says "6 and up". ;)

I doubt most parents are concerned when their children are read a story for an older age group.   They'd probably jump on the bandwagon of thinking the kids are advanced. 

 

FWIW, one of the reasons my kids aren't in traditional school is because stories like this are not permitted.  There is way too much censorship in schools, it has become ridiculous. 

 
User Mood
Excited

Message Emote
blank
November 22, 2006, 5:13 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: purplepenny

This post was 3 days ago. 
is there a deadline for responding to posts?
 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
November 22, 2006, 5:25 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: purplepenny

You do know that can't just make a Venn Diagram with out some kind of real numbers, studies or research to back it up. Just cause it's a Venn Diagram doesn't mean it's TRUE! LOL

 

 

I know that Venn diagrams may be used in the illustration of either mathematic or logic concepts.  When illustrating a logical concept, they function to show relationships, not statistics. Just because it does not utilize numbers does not mean it is not a true representation of a relationship between groups.

 

`

 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 22, 2006, 5:27 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: fredastare

Well, I have never disputed that traditionally schooled children also fall through the cracks.  Yet that is not what is discussion is about.

 

Perhaps your government should revamp and have a national set of standards instead of varying state by state standards?  It may be an improvement.

 

I want to see regulations that place EVERY child's best interests at heart.  Bottom line, pretty simple isn't it?

 

AGAIN........I am not anti-homeschooling.  I am simply stating that in my opinion that there should be accountability and standards met by the educators.  Whether those educators are homeschooling parents or public school teachers.

 

So get over yourself and leave us alone.

 

I am "over myself", that's why I'm posting here.  I believe that I have as much right as any in this forum to stay.

 

I find that in your asking me to leave..........shows me that you haven't fully comprehended my posts.  Not to mention being extremely rude toward another human being.

 

Still I will NOT be bullied ( as so many school aged children do to one another, correct?) into leaving.

 

 

I wasn't suggesting you leave the board. I was suggesting that YOU don't have any right to tell me how to raise my child.

 

From your post I assume you aren't from the US, where are you from? Perhaps the public schools are better there. I also understand that people outside the US don't really have much exposure to homeschooling from a Friends & Flags project we did, where we exchanged information with teachers and students from other countries.

 

Who do you want homeschoolers to be accountable to? Having them be accountable to the State Department of Education is STUPID, as the State Department of Education views homeschoolers & private schoolers as competition taking away their federal and state funding (public schools get money for every warm body in a seat).

 

Here teachers are judged by their students success in passing test. So consider this. I don't have teaching credentials, I homeschooled both my children, me eldest took the ACT at 15, scored a 28 and got early admission to college. At 17 he is in his second year of college majoring in computer science and working after school. He made the Dean's list. He also has a scholarship.  You don't need teaching credentials to teach your children.

If you are not from the US, you may not realize that if he was in public school he would be in the 12th grade and would not graduate until May. So he wouldn't even be in college until the start of the next school year if he had been in the public school system.

 

Also you probably don't know this. Anyone with a High School Diploma can be a substitute teacher in the public schools in Mississippi (not sure about the other states). I have done some substitute teaching myself in the public schools.

 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
November 22, 2006, 5:28 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Purple Penny,

You said before you were on this board to learn about homeschooling, right? What questions do you have?

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 22, 2006, 5:49 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: homeschoolma

I'm not sure what measures in place that you would have to protect our children of our nations.  The schools cannot even do that.  Exactly what measures? 

 

When our society begins to infringe on parents rights to raise their children, the family unit will become less and less important.  We already see this happening.  When parents lose their say, what will our society be like?  I hate to even think about it.

 

Parents should not be regulated to parent their children.  All parents, not just homeschoolers, should be offended.  What society is saying is that ALL parents cannot be trusted to raise their children the way they should be raised, so we must watch them and intervene in their lives.  Who decides how we should raise our children?  It's probably good that I'm not the one who decides.  I stress eating natural, healthy foods, exercising everyday, limiting junk food, very little tv watching, breastfeeding, and many other things that many parents do not do.  If I decide, along with a large group of governmental people, that the above way of raising children is what ALL parents must follow, will this be what is best for ALL families?  I think so because this is how I raise my children.  For parents who don't raise their children this way because they have a difference of opinion, this is not best for their families.  We should be able to choose how to parent our children.

 

This is the same for homeschooling.  It isn't up to society, or the government, to decide if a person should be allowed to homeschool.  It also isn't up to anyone to demand testing or proof that a parent is parenting their child well.  Who decides what is well?  How do they measure?  What happens if the officials decide a parent isn't educating their children well according to their measurements? 

 

I feel our society needs to trust parents to raise their children.  This will make the family unit stronger. 

 

Pa

All parents, not just homeschoolers, should be offended.  What society is saying is that ALL parents cannot be trusted to raise their children the way they should be raised, so we must watch them and intervene in their lives.  Who decides how we should raise our children? 

 

And safeguards are already in place with the DCF or whatever it's called in each state, for those who are truly harming their children. 

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 22, 2006, 6:49 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: sneakers145

All parents, not just homeschoolers, should be offended.  What society is saying is that ALL parents cannot be trusted to raise their children the way they should be raised, so we must watch them and intervene in their lives.  Who decides how we should raise our children? 

 

And safeguards are already in place with the DCF or whatever it's called in each state, for those who are truly harming their children. 

 One of the best quotes I've seen is, "I've seen the village and I don't want it raising my child".

You are absolutely right that we do not need to reinvent the wheel.  Child abuse and neglect investigations have their place, and choosing to educate your child at home - no matter which method you ascribe to - does not mean you need someone knocking at your door every week to make sure you're completing English this week, or Math, or whatever.

Also, for my family, I teach in those areas where I am strong (English, History, Social Sciences, etc.) and my husban dteaches those areas where he is stronger (Math and Science).  When our children get older, if there are topic we don't feel comfortable teaching them, we have a homeschool co-op where students can sign up for advanced classes.

Most elementary school teachers in my state cannot (and do not have to) pass a special math test to teach math - they just have to pass the overall test.  They could fail the English portion or math miserably, still pass overall and be allowed to teach.  In fact, to look at my district's classroom web pages and notes sent home to parents, you would be appalled at the amount of poor spelling, incorrect word usage and grammar errors.  Yet these people are somehow more qualified to teach my child than I am?  I think not. :)
 
First | Prev | 45 | 46 | 47 | 48 | 49 | 50 | 51 | 52 | 53 | 54 | Next | Last