Message Boards

Topic : 11/24 Great School Debate

Number of Replies: 4215
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Friday, November 17, 2006, 12:57:50 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1
Parents want the best for their children, but what’s the best way to educate them? Dr. Phil’s guests face off in a debate about whether to school, homeschool or unschool. Dana and her husband, Joe, call themselves radical unschoolers. They say education happens as a side effect of life, and they don’t believe in tests, curriculums or grades. Are their three kids learning what they need to know? Then, RaeAnn says public schools are death traps and wants to homeschool her children. Her husband, Steve, says their kids are safer at school than they are at home. Can this couple reach a compromise? Plus, Nicole feels like an outcast at 26. She says she hated being homeschooled, and couldn’t relate to other kids. Share your thoughts here.

Find out what happened on the show.

More November 2006 Show Boards.

As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
November 25, 2006, 9:38 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: soebled

I was rather leery about watching the Dr. Phil show yesterday, but found it was not quite what I was expecting after all. Dr. Phil, while an obviously intelligent man, does not always look beyond the obvious in his questions, as most of us don't. For example...when he spoke of his children coming home with math problems, starting at the grade 7 level which were beyond his abilities, the point he was trying to make was how can most parents compare to qualified teachers. However, the first thing that struck me is Dr. Phil is a product of the system, he at least partially advocated, and yet he can not, as an adult, show results in at least some of the areas he was educated in. Will his children also lose the ability to solve these math problems as adults? Looking into this question alone can provide a lot of insight into education.

 

It is understandable that most of us are invested in our views of education, as we are invested in most of the beliefs that we have about the world and our part in it. The debate on the Dr. Phil show centered on whether unschoolers would be able to give their children a comparable education of that received in the public school system. I guess it was further implied that we are speaking of a successful education as it is apparent to all there are many outcomes from the school systems, not all of which we would call successful. Unschoolers in particular, and some homeschoolers as well, have usually questioned themselves already about what education really is and are often not trying to duplicate the same education that can be received in a school system. The unschooling experience is not always a linear, dissected system of learning, but rather a whole integrated one, and it is hard to compare the two.

 

Education needs to be carefully examined and questioned to the very core if one is ever going to come to a true understanding of what unschoolers are hoping to facilitate with their children. The true nature of children is rarely seen these days beyond the school age as the school system changes that nature and it is therefore hard to believe in its existence without first hand evidence.

 

The Dr. Phil show was not even the tip of the iceberg in my opinion, but there was enough information to possibly wet some peoples curiosity to investigate it further. This is not a subject that can easily be decided with a few simple studies or questions, as I believe it is a subject that can open one up to a whole new set of perspectives about our very lives and the way we are living them.

 

I applaud Dr. Phil and his show for even bringing the show to air, and I appreciate everyone that was on the show too, for sharing their views and opinions and allowing us all the chance to question our own.

 

Dr. Phil was right on the money when he said that history will often repeat itself if not examined and if we look at our history of education in ways we have never done before, we might start to work to create a new future. So many of us just do "education" without ever really asking ourselves, what we are doing. Heck, most of us do "life" without ever questioning it, and Dr. Phil is making a living off that fact. An open mind is not one that is seeking to just confirm what they already know, but rather is a mind that is willing to accept for checking, all perspectives available.

 

 

A few years ago, when my son was given a state santioned intelligence test through the public schools, my son's  6th grade Math teacher commented about how exceptional he was in Math ( he tested in the gifted range in Math and superior in Science). He has ADHD and his  handwriting is atrocious. So, often he refuses to write with pencil and paper and refuses to hand write his homework assignments.   She commented that he was doing complicated 3 and 4 step math problems in his head that even she could not decipher, although he was correct.  What she was saying was that he was so far ahead of her, even she could not answer his questions, he had stumped even the gifted Math teachers.

What I disagree with on Dr. Phil's argument, is that  not all teachers, even with Master's Degrees are qualified to teach all kids. The public school system only knows one way and that  is to try to knock all square pegs into round holes. When that doesn't happen, they blame the parents and give up on them. My son is one of those square pegs that refused to be knocked into a round hole.  He is now doing great learning at home through K12.com and OHVA. There are teachers with  Mastter's Degrees, gifted teachers and teachers with specialized degrees on the other end of the computer or phone line if he has a question or needs them. I also have  structured Teachers Books and have my own college tech books( I have 3 years of college education and kept all of my books) which he is learning on his own at the age of 15.

 

I strongly  DISAGREE that kids have to "learn to deal" with bullying,  embarrassment,  depression, rich kid cliques, drugs, alcohol, guns, sex  and a whole myriad of other peer pressure issues  in public schools in order to be "socialized."

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
happy
November 25, 2006, 9:38 am PST

Looking Up Laws

 

I am NOT a lawyer but, from what I gathered after I went to hslda.org to look up ALL 50 state laws on home schooling. The ONLY states were this unschooling family might have a legal right to home school like this (no specific courses taught, testing, qualifications, approval, and/or record keeping needed) are: Alabama, Alaska, Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Mississippi, New Jersey, Oklahoma, and Texas. 

Unless this family lives in one of these states....how can they legally be home schooling their kids. Again, I am not sure what state they live in.  

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 25, 2006, 9:54 am PST

unschooled to public high school

Quote From: gr8ful4him

This is the first I've actually heard of "unschooling", and it sounds rediculous!  I suppose it's a part of the whole self esteem idea...if we don't test them, they can't "fail", and then they won't think poorly of themselves!  In life, we are tested daily.  If we have a job and don't complete it satisfactorily, we are in jeopardy of losing that job...it's a test of sorts.  To raise a child in an environment that they are never tested and only learn what comes to them as a side effect of living is to be neglectful of that child's well-being for the future.

My oldest son was home schooled with strong structure then went on to 4 years of unschooling before choosing to go to our public high school. We believed that the only failure in life was if you gave up. You always have the chance to try harder and meet the success you are striving for if you just keep moving ahead. It is because we at home worked hard at understanding self worth and respect for ourselves and others that he was able to go onto a public system with high esteem and not fall to the level so many of his peers are at. At a recent meeting with his guidance counselor he was asked how school was going for him so far this year. He commented that it was fine, but so many of his friends weren't that fortunate. He saw every day the turmioil of fitting in and keeping up children were stressing over. Some to the point of self inflicted abuses. Is that what we want for our youth? I don't mean to say that the years of schooling did it to these kids, but I'm glad mine was home to be ready for what lied ahead.
 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 25, 2006, 9:54 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: mammato4boys

After watching the show, along with a great deal of personal experience, I have to ask all of you who choose to home school or un-school...who's needs are being met here?? 

 

The children's needs, of course. This is, after all, a decision made to ensure a quality education for the children.

 

In my experience, the decision to keep children at home and away from public education meets the needs of the parents who can't handle letting go of their children in a a far greater capacity  than by the so called protection of their children. 

 

Wow, that's a really broad statement. How would you feel if a homeschooler made this statement,  "In my experience, the decision to send children away to public school meets the needs of the parents who do not want to deal with their children on a daily basis. "?

Oh, and I could even offer evidence as such. How many times have we heard, "I cannot wait until school starts. The kids are driving me crazy!"

 

Can an uneducated parent offer an equal opportunity for education than a trained and educated teacher can? 

I am first, going to assume that your definition of uneducated is describing someone who has not gone to college.

Secondly, in answer to your question, home educated students test scores remain between the 80th and 90th percentiles, whether their mothers have a college degree or did not complete high school.

Remarkably, students taught at home by mothers who never finished high school score a full 55 percentile points higher than public school students from families of comparable educational backgrounds.

 

Is it better for you to teach your kids in all topics as opposed to having one teacher for one subject who majored in that subject and has undergone extensive training in teaching that subject to children? 

 

Yes generally speaking it is better. This is assuming you are asking about homeschoolers in general being able to teach in all topics. Study after study has shown that homeschool students outperform their public school counterparts.

 

In my opinion, homeschoolers can't handle letting go of their kids, understanding that love does not end the moment they are away from us, and are simply serving an internal need to keep kids at home and as dependant and infant-like as possible for as long as is possible. 

 

I am not of the opinion but one could argue that public school parents are too eager to send their children to school because they cannot wait for the child to grow to adults and leave the nest.

Insane statement, isn't it? That's what happens when you generalize.

"The children's needs, of course. This is, after all, a decision made to ensure a quality education for the children."

In YOUR home that is the case.

"Wow, that's a really broad statement. How would you feel if a homeschooler made this statement,  "In my experience, the decision to send children away to public school meets the needs of the parents who do not want to deal with their children on a daily basis. "?

Oh, and I could even offer evidence as such. How many times have we heard, "I cannot wait until school starts. The kids are driving me crazy!"" 


So, seems there are lazy parents on BOTH sides huh? 



 

"I am first, going to assume that your definition of uneducated is describing someone who has not gone to college." 


 

You don't know that is what she meant.

"Secondly, in answer to your question, home educated students’ test scores remain between the 80th and 90th percentiles, whether their mothers have a college degree or did not complete high school. Remarkably, students taught at home by mothers who never finished high school score a full 55 percentile points higher than public school students from families of comparable educational backgrounds." 


 


 

These are tests of those who participated in the testing.



 


 

 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 25, 2006, 9:55 am PST

I need advice

I am a single mom of two boys, 13 and 20.  We are surivors of domestic violence and abuse.  My family didn't approve of me leaving my now ex-husband and because of the therapy my boys and went through, abuse from my own childhood came up and now my boys and I have become out casts of my family. 

It has been over ten years since I have seen any of my siblings, and five years since I have seen my father. 

 

We are shut-ins, my boys don't have a man to use as a role model.

 

I have not dated since my ex-husband, and I don't think it would be fair for me to date giving how our life history is.  No man in his right mind would want a relationship with me.

 

My 13 year old son and I both live on social security and ssi, because of the nature of the abuse we went through from my ex-husband.

 

We live in a very violent neighborhood, and can't get out.  When my son's bike was stolen and I made a police report, the police advised me that I should move out of the neighborhood.  I wish we could.

 

The advice I need is for my 13 year old son regarding schooling.

 

Ever since my son was in the first grade he has hated school, and ever since the first grade my son will honestly throw up every morning.  He will throw up at home, he will throw up at school.  Because of the stress of bullies, he has cronic diahera. 

If I let him stay home after throwing up, he smiles and acts perfectly normal.  If he throws up at school and I have to go to get him and bring him home he is perfectly fine and there is nothing wrong.  It makes it hard to tell when he really is sick.

 

He has had several complete examinations from doctors who can't find anything wrong with him.

 

The day after ever school break is when it is the worse for him, and our battle gets intense.

 

I have had to resort in calling the police to help me to get my son to go to school.

 

I am exhausted, and I can't fight him to go anymore.  I feel like a failure because my son is winning the battle about school.  All because of the bullies at school.

 

Last Easter he woke up to find his glasses broken, and wanted me to let him use his broken glasses as an excuse to not let him go to school.  We have medicaid and it takes a month before new glasses to come in, so I couldn't.  I did write a note for the school and I explained to them what happened with his glasses.  He can't see very well without them.

 

In the note I asked them if they had any large print text books that he could use until his new glasses came in the would really be appericiated, also if he should have any head aches, they had my permission to give him some Tylenol.

 

An hour later my 13 year old son comes home with a big grin on his face and said the school had sent him home because they didn't have any large print text books and they told him he could stay home until his glasses came in.  He also said that they would send him his home work home with him.

 

I called the school to verify what my 13 year old son had told me, but I was told that everyone I needed to speak with were busy conducting interviews and that I would have to leave a voicemail message, which I did.  I left a very detailed voicemail message and also left my phone number.  Nobody returned my phone call.  The next day I called the school, again I was told the samething and I again I left a very detailed message including my phone number.  This went on for a whole week, and still I did not recieve a call back from the school.  After the second week I gave up on the school and just asumed my son might be telling the truth, but wondered about his homework.

 

Three weeks later the school finally calls me, but not to turn my voicemail messages.  It was the attendence office letting me know my son had not been in school for a while.  I told the attendence office everything, and not long the vice principal who is also incharge of the special education finally called me and made a home visit and came up with a plan to try independent study for the rest of the school year.

 

The last day of school, both my boys and myself went to my 13 year old son's school and dropped off his homework.  He turned in everything.

 

When we got his last report card, he got all zeros and "E"s with a note saying that he failed because he never turned in his work.

 

What am I suppose to do?

 

Any advice?

 

If you had to deal with this, what would you do?

 

Would you still choose traditional schooling?

 

Homeschooling?

 

Of would you go with unschooling, which I am looking into, am not sure if they have such a program in my neighborhood.

 

I can't help him with his homeschooling, I don't know a lot of his math, I am not a teacher.

 

What can I do?

 

Please, I am serious, what can I do.

 

My 13 year old's education is at a very high risk here.

 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 25, 2006, 10:00 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: mammato4boys

In your home state, Mississippi, testing is not a requirement by state law.

Not for homeschooled or private schooled children.

 

Public school children of course have to meet all the state testing requirements as well as NCLB requirements.

 

This in no way adversely affected my son's ability to get into the college of his choice.

 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
November 25, 2006, 10:06 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: klemauga

After watching the show, along with a great deal of personal experience, I have to ask all of you who choose to home school or un-school...who's needs are being met here??  In my experience, the decision to keep children at home and away from public education meets the needs of the parents who can't handle letting go ot their children in a a far greater capacity  than by the so called protection of their children.  Can an uneducated parent offer an equal opportunity for education than a trained and educated teacher can?  For all of you debaters, so if you have a Bachelors...even a Masters degree, wha did you major in?  Considering that our children learn essentially at least ten different subjects, did you major in all ten?  Is it better for you to teach your kids in all topics as oppossed to having one teacher for one subject who majored in that subject and has undergone extensive training in teaching that subject to children?  Yes, parents have love, that is our job.  We major in love and bonding even if we dropped out of school all together.  But love does not qualify us to educate our children.  We play a huge role in their success, but we need our teachers to truly give our kids all they deserve.  In my opinion, homeschoolers can't hanlde letting go of their kids, understanding that love does not end the moment they are away from us, and are simply serving an internal need to keep kids at home and as dependant and infant-like as possible for as long as is possible.  If you are so bored with your life then get a job...just let your kids get the education and experience they desereve.  If you truly put them first, you will let go!

Why is that Public school proponents all think that parents that  home-school their children are all uneducated morons that don't have a clue as to what they are doing? Nothing could be further from the truth.

Many of us have a college education AND degrees. I am also a single mother.   Why would you think that only degreed teachers are only qualified to teach other people's children.  Where did you get the idea that all teachers have Master's degrees and can teach children of all backgrounds and learning styles? That's a huge myth in society perpetuated by ignorance.

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 25, 2006, 10:09 am PST

size of schools

Quote From: jettav

And I think this is a problem with a lot of schools, they "seem" to think that the bigger the school the better, but I think a smaller setting is better but of course that is my opinion and that is why I chose a school that is smaller in size. I still think my daughters class is too big but it is smaller then the school classes down the street that she would have went to.

As far as sizes of schools are concerned I would agree that in the classroom less is more, but I have  evolved in how I feel about the size of the school itself. Having homeschooled 7 years prior to my son choosing to go to high school I believed that if we had to be in school small would be my first choice, but as I interviewed friends and family that changed. In a small or VERY small school you either fit in or you don't. You may have only one or two classes per grade and that intimate a setting may not be best for a growing mind and ego. I actually found to my surprise that the population of 1600 in the high school my son attends makes more sense to us. There are 30 plus clubs alone to suit any and all interests and if it doesn't exist someone will start one. Not only do they have them, but everyone is required to find one through a process aof regular trial days till you find what fits. You meet people you may have otherwise not known in your day to day schedule. I was pleased for this program and know that in the smaller schools this is either not offered or limited.

 

Also Bullying exists at all school levels, but it sure hurts more in a small setting if you don't have many allies.

 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 25, 2006, 10:11 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: annelizabeth

Public schools are being asked to show they are providing an education that will prepare their children for the world.  Private schools must prove this also.  If they don't or can't then parents are remiss in sending their children there because they are cheating their children out of an education.  Home school - all schools - need to demonstrate that they are doing the job or they should not be allowed to do it.  Cost is not the issue.  Good education is.

States and the Federal government do not require testing of private school students, private schools do not have to meet the requirements of NCLB. So why should they make these demands of homeschoolers?

 

Your tax money pays for a public school education, that is why taxpayers have the right to demand that public schools be accountable.

 

Tax money is not used for private school tuition or homeschools therefore you have no right to DEMAND that private or homeschooled students be accountable to you.

 

Parents who send their children to private schools have the right to demand that the schools be accountable to them because they pay the tuition. If they are not satisfied with the schools performance they are free to send their children elsewhere or homeschool.

 

Unless you want to provide homeschoolers with tax money you have no right to demand they be accountable to you or  anyone else.

 

Considering how well homeschoolers score on test and how easy it is for them to get into college, I think you have ample evidence that they are doing a good job.

 

 

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 25, 2006, 10:13 am PST

Unschooling: Hands on Learning?

 Wow!  I could hardly believe my ears when I listened to the couple talk about their unschooling of their children.  My concern, of course, was the "child directed learning" (If the child wants to learn to build bombs, is that okay?  If the child wants to discover the differences between different types of drugs--by experimenting--is that okay?  How does the child know what he wants to learn until he has at least some exposure to it?) however, my main concern was the lack of discipline in this home.
No rules?  Whatever the child wants?  He decides what he will do and when.  There is a name for that:  ANARCHY!   Dr. Phil made a good point (which was completely lost on the parents) about what happens when the child grows up and gets into the real world where there are rules, deadlines, expectations, and--yes, pressure.
This home prepares their children for none of those things.  God help them when they try to hold jobs someday where their employer actually expects something of them.
And how do they develop a conscience and a moral compass when they have no rules and no consequences?  I feel sorry for those children (whose parents, I'm sure are well-meaning) because they are being set up for a hard dose of reality someday when they deal with a society whose laws are real and consequences are real.
 
First | Prev | 145 | 146 | 147 | 148 | 149 | 150 | 151 | 152 | 153 | 154 | Next | Last