Message Boards

Topic : 11/24 Great School Debate

Number of Replies: 4215
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Friday, November 17, 2006, 12:57:50 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1
Parents want the best for their children, but what’s the best way to educate them? Dr. Phil’s guests face off in a debate about whether to school, homeschool or unschool. Dana and her husband, Joe, call themselves radical unschoolers. They say education happens as a side effect of life, and they don’t believe in tests, curriculums or grades. Are their three kids learning what they need to know? Then, RaeAnn says public schools are death traps and wants to homeschool her children. Her husband, Steve, says their kids are safer at school than they are at home. Can this couple reach a compromise? Plus, Nicole feels like an outcast at 26. She says she hated being homeschooled, and couldn’t relate to other kids. Share your thoughts here.

Find out what happened on the show.

More November 2006 Show Boards.

As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Depressed

Message Emote
blank
November 26, 2006, 4:12 pm PST

in an argument, try logic

Quote From: trainbrainmom

I do know that the belief systems taught in public schools - yes, forced on the students in the form of curriculum - are not my beliefs.  When my child is not allowed to learn my beliefs, your beliefs ARE being forced on him.  So I should be forced to accept your or others' standards for curriculum taught to my children?  The theory of evolution being taught as fact does infringe on my and my children's beliefs.  If children should be given the opportunity to examine other belief systems and decide for themselves, why is it that intelligent design isn't allowed to be taught in most public schools.  And the fact that you demand I not call "sin" "sin" infringes on my beliefs. 

Why is abstinence considered religious?  It is the one and only fireproof way to ensure teens do not contract STDs or get pregnant.  If I told you the only fireproof way to ensure you don't fall out of a tree is to stay out of a tree, would that be considered religious?  As for liberals not having a problem with teaching abstainance to teens, where have you been?  Abstinence education - not abstinence-only ed as purported - is attacked by Planned Parenthood - the largest contributor to sex ed in public schools.  (Do a google search.)  The only reason it is necessary to teach any sex ed in schools is that parents don't step up and educate their children themselves.  It is easier to expect the government to get involved in and control yet one more aspect of a person's life.  If your child needs to know about STDs or contraceptives, why can't you teach them?  You certainly seem to be educated and able to communicate your beliefs very clearly. 

I would have to totally disagree - most, I am sure not all, liberals do not seem to have a code - whatever feels good or offers immediate gratification is tolerated and I am automatically wrong because I disagree.  So because I adhere to Scriptural principles - not laws - "I" am intolerant.  The laws of logic apparently don't apply universally anymore.  Your intolerance of my difference in beliefs is acceptable - this is simply a non sequitur.  Intolerance works both ways; however, it is only the conservatives or "religious" who are attacked for it.

If anyone cares to actually read the documents written by the founding fathers, Scripture is quoted repeatedly.  And BTW, we do not even live in a true democracy - we live in a democratic republic.

You say: "the fact that you demand I not call "sin" "sin" infringes on my beliefs."

 

If that was my demand, it would infringe on your beliefs.  But that is not what I demand. 

 

You can call anything you like "sin" & I couldn't care less.  If you did it over a loudspeaker at 3 AM while I was trying to sleep I would object.  Otherwise, your beliefs are your business and of no moment to me.

 

I object  to the public schools calling certain behavior a "sin" in keeping with your religious beliefs.  This is a country where religion is private and the precepts of your religion, my religion, the branch davidians, the cool-aid gang or any other religions are not supposed to be part of any governmental program.

 

Why don't you respond to the facts asserted instead of to the agenda that exists only in your own mind?

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 26, 2006, 4:15 pm PST

Great School Debate

Quote From: catsigh

I have taught at every age level, taught public school, alternative school, substitute taught, night school, high school, preschool, 1 on 1 lessons, taught my own 3 kids at home for 6 years.  I really enjoyed homeschooling.  It allowed our family to be really close and it was a good balance to housekeeping.  We only had one income but it was very worth it. 

     There's nothing magic about "educational training" or public school.  People only learn what they're interested in NO MATTER WHAT.  Homeschool is better I feel just because kids can get more attention.  Mine had two parents/adults to 3 kids.  In other places the ratio is way lower, sometimes 30/1, sometimes more.  That simple fact is important. 

     The other reason I think homeschooling is superior is because the parents LOVE their kids.  When the day is full of hassling, adults are more motivated by love of their kids more than a teacher is by their paycheck.

     It does take a brave person to teach their own kids.  It's a never ending job just as it is in the public system.  I found it extremely rewarding but none of my kids is doing it with their kids yet.  (Only one of them has kids, none school age yet.)  It's a very individual thing but the system we have seems woefully inadequate.  Computors will help people educate themselves and then give them access to recreation centres where they can plug into group activities.  We need lots of alternatives to suit the needs of our very diverse population. 

     What I'm "surprised" about it how many people have an opinion on this who don't have children or who have never tried teaching.  ..XOXOXO

    

 

Amen, and Thank You!!! 
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 26, 2006, 4:16 pm PST

A better View point

I watched the show thinking that as a home schooling Mom it would be nice to hear the "Great debate". It was nice to have so many public school teachers & home schoolers there because each person brings a different point of view. I do feel that the Unschoolers & the home school want-to-be couple were not a good choice for a "debate".  I know that Dr. Phill said several times that unschooling was not home schooling but I still feel that having them on the show ,he did like so many other shows do. They put home schoolers in a bad light. I do not see any shows putting a military school teacher on to represent the public school system. If you are going to do a real debate you need an average home schooler(hard, I know) & a public school parent or teacher. These extreme examples help no one understand. I feel that Dr. Phill just put himself in the same category as all of the other talk shows. I would have thought that he would have worked harder to show a more realistic view. To educate people instead of throwing the extreme out there. It is because of these types of shows that when I say that we home school people look at me like I am depriving my children of the education & socialization that they need.  There are a lot of us out there that teach our children at home. I follow a curriculum that is set up before we start for the year & we complete it. It may not all be text books & tests but I know that they are learning what they need and have yearly testing to make sure we stay on track. Home schooling allows me to slow down & take the time when he has problems with a concept or speed up when he knows it. I do not feel that any public or private school is going to do that. I just want to ask the Dr. Phill staff to please look for a more realistic guest the next time they do a show about education. I would just love to see a show that truly shows what home schoolers are about.     

    

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 26, 2006, 4:21 pm PST

Unschool = love of learning

I never in my wildest drams thought I would homeschool my children.  Now that I am, it is even more surprising to myself that I am an unschooler.  We are not as "radical" as Dayna and her family (we live on a schedule), but I definitely know where she is coming from.  Children know what they live, what they experience.  My children have lived in a home where they are respected.  Respected and also given clear limits.  Our home principals that  we live on are simple and easy for the children to understand.  They are 1) treat others and their property as you would like to be treated, and 2)respect yourself. 

 

That said, I realize I can not expect that of my children which I do not expect of myself.  I absolutely hold myself to the standard I set for them.  They very rarely misbehave and they are only are 3 and 5.   I also realize I must conduct myself in a manner that shows that I, their mother love and enjoy learning.  I was not always so passionate about learning, even though I was a straight A student when I attended school.  I made grades for the sake of grades out of fear what would happen if I did not get good grades.  I "learned"  things in school, took the test, got an A, and forgot everything.   Now, what did I really learn? 

 

As a homeschool mom I have willingly enbraced learning many things.  In the past few years I have taken up sewing and made quitlts for my girls.  I now read...even though for the nearly 10 years since highschool I had not.  Now...I love to read.  I garden, I canned food this year, and I bake.  All things which are new to me.  I try to set an example that learning new things can be challenging, but enjoyable and internally rewarding.  There is nothing more motivating to my girls than to be surrounded by loving parents who are participating in their own learning as well.  If I pick up a book during the day, my girls will be inspired to do the same.  If I am involved in my own craft project, they will help and/or start their own project.  When we are out and about I am just as interested in zoos, museums etc. as they are (and I'm not just faking it).  My girls are very involved in activities from gymnastics, swimming, dance, art class...They absolutely would not be able to participate in so many activities if they were in school.  They would be exhausted.

 

The saddest thing I have seen in this debate is the assumption that if left to make any of their own choices children will do the nothing, screw up their future, and become useless people who can't / won't pull their own weight.

 
User Mood
Peaceful

Message Emote
blank
November 26, 2006, 4:22 pm PST

About Socialization

Quote From: winterwarmth

klmsam50 wrote:
"About socialization:
  Public or homeschool, children are a reflection of who their parents are.  Nerdy parents will have nerdy children; social parents will have social children; well-rounded parents will have well-rounded children; and narrow-minded parents will have narrow-minded children."
----
It depends.  I am very different from my parents in many ways, as I think independently.  My 4 children are widely different from even each other, and yet, there are only 2 parents here.

Children learn what they live, basically.  If they learn confidence in themselves, they will grow to be their more mature selves as time passes on, be it nerdy, smart, open minded, narrow minded.

BTW, I really loved your post, but just wanted to comment on that one statement.

Thank you for your comments.  I too, am very different than my parents because when I became old enough to see myself for who I was, I decided I needed to make a huge change.  I was unsocial, and very narrow minded and I guess a bit nerdy, too.  It probably had alot to do with the extremely abusive childhood we had...that will definitely do a number on you.  I had to unlearn all of that by the time I had my children...thank God, I did. 

 
User Mood
Depressed

Message Emote
blank
November 26, 2006, 4:23 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: cawill43

The school was over five miles away and at the time I didn't have a car.

 

Because of the bullies from my own childhood and the abuse, I am not emotionally strong enough to have such a loud voice.  I am emotionally weak.

 

He did turn in all his work on time, the school just ended up losing his work.

 

Regardless, what about my son's severe emotional scars towards school?

 

My son has been through therapy, all three of us have.  We have all taken the medications for depression, anxieties, you name it we took it.  Because of the medications my 13 year son now has liver damage.

 

What I failed to meantioned was that my 13 year old son had lied about the school sending him home until his new glasses came in.  Yes, I did give him a consenquence for lying to me, but that does not excuse what the school did.

 

I am the only parent my boys have.

 

Even if I had the courage, the voice to yell and scream at the school, what about my son's fears of schools and their bullies?

 

 

You are a mother.  You have  a responsibility to look out for your children.  You cannot hide behind an excuse like "Because of the bullies from my own childhood and the abuse, I am not emotionally strong enough to have such a loud voice.  I am emotionally weak."  That's like admitting that you are so mentally impaired that you will neglect your son's needs rather than go out there and do what's necessary to help them.  I would bet that some of y our boys' fears arise from inhaling your fears every moment of the day.  You've got to get help for y ourself so that your passivity does not poison your children until it's too late for them, if that's not already the case.  Look, you were abused before you decided to have kids.  What's more powerful in life than a mother's love?  Nothing magical is going to enter your life and remove the misery.  You have to do that yourself.  If necessary, start training now to walk 5 miles.  Alot of people do things that terrify them because they have to.  You owe your boys courage.  Courage means acting  despite your fears.  You can feel scared inside, but youju must go out and fight for them and stop feeding their fears.

 

Also, the kids have to learn how to cope with bullies because the world is full of them.  My kid was assigned a teacher with a bad rep in the 4th grade.  A lot of her friends' mothers agitated to transfer their kids out.  I told her she had a splendid opportunity to learn how to get along with a difficult personality.  She did & ended up liking & understanding the teacher.  Stop encouraging their fears and giving in to your own fears.  Get yourself down to that school and work out a plan for each of your kids.

 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
November 26, 2006, 4:34 pm PST

Trivium

Quote From: roundandround

No one seems to be asnwering my questions, so I'll ask again.

What do you think it means to be "educated?"

What IS a well rounded education?

Is it having knowledge in subjects like science, math, english, history, and art? Or could it mean having knowledge in business studies, psych., computer studies, and Chinese?

Does one need an "education" to be smart? To "make it" in life?

Is there a difference between education and schooling?

I think to be educated means to have knowledge, yes, much stored in memory so that you can connect those facts ann see how they fit together.  The last part of being educated is being able to communicate that knowledge and reasoning effectively.  To enable others to understand your conclusions. 

 

After I wrote it, I realized what I had described was what is called the trivium in classical education: grammar, logic and rhetoric.

 

A well-rounded education means the knowledge is not just in one field, but in many.  This can also be called breadth of knowlegde.  It is the opposite of "job training" which many today confuse with education.   An education doesn't lead to a job, it sure is useful when you get there though - which is why many $$ successful folks or those who have prestigious jobs with prestigious firms have liberal arts degrees, in addition to those MBA's.

 

If by smart you mean intelligent, then no, that is certainly a genetic and some nurturing attribute.  You would have to define "make it."   By making it  do you mean self-supporting, or do you mean $$$ affluent, or do you mean content with one' s life, no matter the square footage of the house, stocks inthe portfolio or other outward sign of economic affluence.

 

If one has the framework of a classical education from liberal arts studies, one can acquire the others, like computers.  Business and psychology are included in the rhetoric and logic parts of the trivium.

 

To school means to educate through habituation.  Education can be the result - a skill mastered through practice.  They are not synonymous.  Today, schooling can mean the successful warming of a seat for x number of years - definitely not an education.     

 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
November 26, 2006, 4:36 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: purplepenny

You really don't see the irony in you being defensive for your cause and then saying something offensive like this?

Why is it offensive to you?

 

I have heard numerous public school parents say this along with 'I DON'T KNOW HOW YOU HOMESCHOOL I COULDN'T STAND BEING AROUND MY KIDS THAT MUCH".

 

Many public school parents (note not ALL) seem to think of public schools as unpaid babysitters. Many public school parents (again not ALL) don't seem to enjoy spending time with their children.

 

I am sorry if this offends you, but it is the truth.

 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
November 26, 2006, 4:48 pm PST

Homeschooling

I don't think it's clear from the show that there is a difference between "unschooling" and homeschooling. At the very least, unschooling is just one type of homeschooling--and is by far not the norm among homeschoolers I know. To equate unschooling with ALL homeschooling--as it seemed happened at times on the show--does a great disservice to the majority of homeschoolers who plan diligently to ensure that our kids receive the education they need, in every facet of life. (And maybe that happens with unschooling, too. I don't know. I just want people to be clear that not all homeschooling is loose and unstructured, if that is a concern.) I also must comment on remarks made by Dr. Phil and several on the message boards regarding the "science" of teaching and the notion that teachers who have been trained in teacher-education programs are automatically better than parents at providing an education to kids. I went through a teacher-education program and taught in public schools for nine years. And I can say without hesitation that my teacher-training program didn't prepare me one bit for what I encountered in the classroom. No, we were not taught the latest, best methods for imparting knowledge to young people; on the contrary, all we did was jump through professors' hoops (for example, searching and documenting uncounted ERIC files in the library for a social studies methods course--what would that ever have to do with reaching the heart and mind of a child?!). There is SO much of being a teacher--in any setting--that is innate: You've either "got it," or you don't. And no amount of sitting in college methods classes will give it to you if you lack that special "something" to be an excellent teacher. No, not every parent should try to homeschool, but neither should we be so naive as to think that, just because someone has a state teaching license, they are inherently more qualified. Unfortunately, I can think of dozens of my former school colleagues who should not be in classrooms, and I would never want my own kids with them. I take further issue with Dr. Phil's contention that homeschooling through high school is automatically problematic (I usually love everything you say, Dr. Phil, but in this case I think you are gravely overgeneralizing, and I'd want to know what research you've been looking at!). Rather, I think it comes down to the child. I know a great number of homeschooled high schoolers and they love their experiences, are well-rounded and very well-adjusted. I understand that might not be the case for everyone, but we shouldn't make blanket statements about the necessity of sending all teenagers to public or private school. Homeschool works for many of them...and they go on to be wonderful, productive members of society. My girls are little--just four and five now--and we started homeschool kindergarten with the older one this year. Yes, I am a big believer in homeschool and, at this point, I anticipate homeschooling both of them all the way through. But I hope (and pray) for wisdom to know if other means of education would be appropriate at some point. What I definitely know for now is that no classroom teacher--even the most loving and dedicated, of which there are many--knows my girls' needs better than I do. And I know from my public school teaching days that I do have that "something" to be a good teacher for them...so that's what I am and what I will be for a long time to come!
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 26, 2006, 4:52 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: catsigh

I have taught at every age level, taught public school, alternative school, substitute taught, night school, high school, preschool, 1 on 1 lessons, taught my own 3 kids at home for 6 years.  I really enjoyed homeschooling.  It allowed our family to be really close and it was a good balance to housekeeping.  We only had one income but it was very worth it. 

     There's nothing magic about "educational training" or public school.  People only learn what they're interested in NO MATTER WHAT.  Homeschool is better I feel just because kids can get more attention.  Mine had two parents/adults to 3 kids.  In other places the ratio is way lower, sometimes 30/1, sometimes more.  That simple fact is important. 

     The other reason I think homeschooling is superior is because the parents LOVE their kids.  When the day is full of hassling, adults are more motivated by love of their kids more than a teacher is by their paycheck.

     It does take a brave person to teach their own kids.  It's a never ending job just as it is in the public system.  I found it extremely rewarding but none of my kids is doing it with their kids yet.  (Only one of them has kids, none school age yet.)  It's a very individual thing but the system we have seems woefully inadequate.  Computors will help people educate themselves and then give them access to recreation centres where they can plug into group activities.  We need lots of alternatives to suit the needs of our very diverse population. 

     What I'm "surprised" about it how many people have an opinion on this who don't have children or who have never tried teaching.  ..XOXOXO

    

 

What I'm "surprised" about it how many people have an opinion on this who don't have children or who have never tried teaching.  ^..^XOXOXO

 

Are you referring to me? I have taught and I have kids.

 

other reason I think homeschooling is superior is because the parents LOVE their kids.  When the day is full of hassling, adults are more motivated by love of their kids more than a teacher is by their paycheck.

 

You are making some huge assumptions here. While I hope most homeschooling parents ( actually, all parents) love their kids, I think it's a leap to say that is THE motivation for homeschooling. I have seen some parents decide to homeschool simply because they do not want to deal with pressure from schools and authorities to make their child attend school, participate in school, or behave in school.

 

It also insinuates that parents who CHOOSE public schooling or private schooling are not motivated by LOVE when they make that decision. Furthermore, some parents can love their kids to the ends of the Earth and still not be equipped emotionally or intellectually to homeschool them. Homeschooling, in and of itself, is not always superior.

 

As a former teacher, let me assure you that although I could not have done it for free, the paycheck alone was not enough to motivate me. A local garbage man I knew in my early years of teaching made more money than I did. A teacher can not replicate the love a parent has for a child, but most teachers are motivated by a love of children and a sincere desire to help them. That's why teachers like me would spend weekends at the school building sets for the drama performance, stayed after school for countless hours as the newspaper sponsor, chaperoned every dance (knowing full well that it was late night duty as several parents would "forget" their kids), and even spent a night cruising in a police car until the wee hours because a runaway student had called my home and was suicidal.  It also takes a brave person to teach other people's kids.

 

 

 
First | Prev | 166 | 167 | 168 | 169 | 170 | 171 | 172 | 173 | 174 | 175 | Next | Last