Message Boards

Topic : 11/24 Great School Debate

Number of Replies: 4215
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Friday, November 17, 2006, 12:57:50 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1
Parents want the best for their children, but what’s the best way to educate them? Dr. Phil’s guests face off in a debate about whether to school, homeschool or unschool. Dana and her husband, Joe, call themselves radical unschoolers. They say education happens as a side effect of life, and they don’t believe in tests, curriculums or grades. Are their three kids learning what they need to know? Then, RaeAnn says public schools are death traps and wants to homeschool her children. Her husband, Steve, says their kids are safer at school than they are at home. Can this couple reach a compromise? Plus, Nicole feels like an outcast at 26. She says she hated being homeschooled, and couldn’t relate to other kids. Share your thoughts here.

Find out what happened on the show.

More November 2006 Show Boards.

As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
December 1, 2006, 6:51 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: shroomroom

if our publics schools are so great why is it that we spend more money per kid than any other nation yet we rank really low?  anybody got any answers

IMO, it is a cultural problem, We, as a society, do NOT value education the way that other countries do. If you look at the comparisons to countries like Japan, we simply do not have a cultural reverence for education like they do. My husband lived in Europe for many years, primarily Holland and Belgium, the value of being an educated human being is simply higher. I am not simply referring to the schools, but how the citizens live their lives and pursue interests. I can't say for sure, but I am guessing you won't find many "My Kid Beat Up Your Honor Student" bumper stickers in most other countries. It really comes down to our values.

 

Furthermore, I think much of the money we spend on education has more to do with fixing societal problems than the process of educating. Drug education, character education, self-esteem programs. Schools have become the fix it place, not very successfully, for problems that originated elsewhere.

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
happy
December 1, 2006, 7:20 am PST

Homeschoolers are not deprived

My husband I decided to homeschool our son, our only child some time after I became disabled.  He was in church school for most of his elementary school years but was homeschooled with a structured program, with a curriculum we obtained through our church homeschool program.  I learned so much more than I did when I was in school myself especially in science and history.  He was exposed to so much and was not deprived at all.  As a matter of fact, he went on so much field trips to many different places while in homeschool and was able to conduct numerous scientific experiments that he never got while enrolled in school.  He has been more places than most students his age and not only did he learn a lot, he had a lot of fun doing them.  Due to decline in my health,  we enrolled him in Charter school and he loves it.  He only started to talk about social issues because others have voiced this to him.  He was never deprived of that because we involved him with a christian athletic physical education program and had adequate interaction with students.  He was able to work at his own pace and days when he was not up to doing school, he was able to relax and still not be behind and got his work done and his grades never suffered.  In my estimation, students benefit even more and can make good decisions and can operate at a good balance with parental guidance and support.  Too many children are lost in the public school system because parents expect teachers to train and fix what's wrong so they won't have to do it and they won't have to be bothered with the task of raising their children.  Our son I believe is more balanced because of his exposure to home school and the fact that he has had some good teachers in the public school system when he attended school.    I would have loved to be on your show to talk to those parents who believe these children should be raising themselves.  Why do they need parents if they decide what to do about everything?
 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
December 1, 2006, 7:30 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: julie1418

IMO, it is a cultural problem, We, as a society, do NOT value education the way that other countries do. If you look at the comparisons to countries like Japan, we simply do not have a cultural reverence for education like they do. My husband lived in Europe for many years, primarily Holland and Belgium, the value of being an educated human being is simply higher. I am not simply referring to the schools, but how the citizens live their lives and pursue interests. I can't say for sure, but I am guessing you won't find many "My Kid Beat Up Your Honor Student" bumper stickers in most other countries. It really comes down to our values.

 

Furthermore, I think much of the money we spend on education has more to do with fixing societal problems than the process of educating. Drug education, character education, self-esteem programs. Schools have become the fix it place, not very successfully, for problems that originated elsewhere.

It is a cultural problem.  We can't blame the schools, educators, OR society, in general, as the messages get blurry as to what the function of a school is supposed to be.

Yeah, it's become the fix-it place, but isn't that's what it's advertised as being, for the most part?  This gold-mine of "professionals", who can step in where parents really can't or shouldn't?  I can understand the need for professionals to step in where parents should but have not, but it's often advertised as being the other way around.

I'm sure I don't have to ask you, Julie, in advance, to not read me the wrong way, as you and I are fairly well acquainted on this particular forum.  But I'll put the usual disclaimer in that even though we unschool and don't currently use the public schools, I'm not against public education (it's a necessary service for many people!) or any form of education which works for the betterment of the individual child. :)
 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
December 1, 2006, 8:12 am PST

Homeschooling with Positive Results

I have been homeschooling my son for 2 years now.  I started out doing it because he wasn't getting help in school for his special needs and frankly I didn't want him "labelled" because of it.  We are working through the material as laid out by our government but with the freedom to spend as much or as little time on a given topic as I see fit.  What this has done for my son is make him really enjoy learning.  Isn't that the point??  To give the kid the gift of the enjoyment of learning a new thing??  I ask my neighbor's boy how school was today and I usually get "okay" - nothing else is said.  My husband asks our son what he did that day and he usually gets a wonderfully long description about the things he has learned.  My experience with this so far is a good one.  Others shouldn't be afraid to try it if they feel they haven't got any options.

 

Sincerely,

Tamie

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
hopeful
December 1, 2006, 8:22 am PST

Our success

As a mother of 2 I chose to homeschool my son for many reasons.  He was tested in Kindergarten at a 1st grade level, and when I pulled him out of PS January of 2nd he was still testing at the same level.  His teacher "didn't have time for all 27 of the children she was to loose 5 on the top and 10 on the bottom."  This statement stunned me, as a volunteering parent and daughter of teaching parents.  I decided with a little coaching from my father that I was able to teach my son to at least the standard of PS. 

 

We use both older PS text books and newer curriculum for the basic math and english classes.  We use unit studies for history and science. When we study a subject we learn all that we can find. If the kids are interested they learn all about it instead of memorizing it to pass a test. 

 

My son has been out of PS for 2 years in Jan. and doing extremely well.  He previously scored 1st grade in Language arts and in July when he was tested he was reading at a 7th grade level and 4th in the grammar etc.  Math, he was scoring 1st grade and tested 3rd grade 4th month recently. ( Math was a real struggle because the school he went to taught "new math" and we had to basically start from scratch.  I have never added from the left to the right, frankly, I was disgusted that they would want all of the parents to come to school once a week and attend classes so that we could help out children  with their homework. )

 

I can see that people are a little frightened by the thought of parents teaching their children, my husband was.  He was not sold on the idea, but knew that we would have to do something.  Now that our son is succeeding he is very glad that we decided to make the change.  Our daughter is only 4 and starting to read. She loves to do school with her brother and is learning a lot from him. They seem to teach each other. 

 

 

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
December 1, 2006, 8:25 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: momofbrw

I guess I misunderstood.  I got the impression that you thought homeschoolers should be regulated.  Here, you are using the word "restricted".  I don't understand that either.

 

I cannot find the original post but this is what went through my mind as I read it.  I may not have been yours, I don't know, but several posts indicated that the government should have some control over our homeschooling.

 

In a perfect world, parents could be regulated to determine if they are fit to be parents, further, the government could restrict some people from becoming parents.  That would be a perfect world, but then our right to freedom would be in jeopardy.  It's the same with government control over homeschooling.  They cannot control a pediphile in charge of a third grade classroom.  They cannot control parents who don't parent.  They should not be allowed to try and control the parents, the curriculum, the method or anything else in a homeschool.  They have enough to deal with in their own school rooms!

The government and society does in a way try to correct  these things you describe.  They "try" to control the actions of pediphiles, they step in when their is child abuse present, or  domestic abuse, etc.  They "try" to make sure everyone in society is protected, safe, and at the same time not interfere with our freedoms and our constitutional rights.  I personally, DO want the local, state, and federal agencies to do what they can.  However, you cannot do it all.  For example, No one is probably going to stop the selling and using of drugs, in this country, anytime soon.  But, that does not mean you don't do anything at all!
 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
December 1, 2006, 8:25 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: julie1418

IMO, it is a cultural problem, We, as a society, do NOT value education the way that other countries do. If you look at the comparisons to countries like Japan, we simply do not have a cultural reverence for education like they do. My husband lived in Europe for many years, primarily Holland and Belgium, the value of being an educated human being is simply higher. I am not simply referring to the schools, but how the citizens live their lives and pursue interests. I can't say for sure, but I am guessing you won't find many "My Kid Beat Up Your Honor Student" bumper stickers in most other countries. It really comes down to our values.

 

Furthermore, I think much of the money we spend on education has more to do with fixing societal problems than the process of educating. Drug education, character education, self-esteem programs. Schools have become the fix it place, not very successfully, for problems that originated elsewhere.

Hi Julie! if you live in my shcool district they spend more bsecause they argue over tennis courts. The districts getting land from the borough to expand the school and the borough wants tennis courts. There's courts on the land now that nobody uses. so, it'll take them years to argue it out and meanwhile building costs go up. It's insane!
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
December 1, 2006, 8:36 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: m_kbarker

I will rephrase that. All of the teachers, and there are PLENTY, that I know and come in contact with talk about the money they received. Not the fact that "Jack so and so" learned something new or finally got what they were trying to teach him. And if you saw the 12-16 year old kid that come to our school from public school that were passed on and couldn't read your heart would hopefully break. I have taught a 16 year old with hooked on phonics and watched the shame turn into delight as he finally got it. That is what teaching is all about. Not a piece of paper or bonus at the end of the year. I know there are good teachers out there. I have met 1 or 2, but the majority are not. From what I have seen. And as for the post about my daughter being an influence. Yes she can be an influence to others, but I won't sacrifice all of the hard work by putting her with a group of girls with body piercings and tattoos and expect her to change them. That would be like throwing meat to a hungry dog. I don't blame the girls I blame society and the parents. Everywhere you look young girls are being exploited. I will not put my daughter through that until she is ready. She has a job and works. And other girls see her wearing a skirt and her modest apparel and all they do is make fun of her. Great society huh. Again not the other kids fault, it is the parents. I am not running anyone into the ground. I am merely stating the facts. They are sad aren't they.

I think you are still saying the same thing, just trying to sound a little nicer!   Where are you from, that the teachers all talk about money and only "1" or "2" care, and the "majority are not good"?

 

And as far as your daughter, I did not say she needed to be the next "savior" to other teenage girls.  And I do not think I throw my 3 teeanage daughters to the wolves, by sending them out to public school every day.  I also don't believe they go out with intent to be saviors.  We obviously think differently about this topic, which is ok.  I don't believe a person can be judged by the way they look.  I sometimes where short skirts, low tops, and even have a tattoo!!  But I also, am a college graduate with a masters degree, a volunteer at my children's school, and I even go to church sometimes!!!!

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
December 1, 2006, 8:46 am PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: wheeee

I'm 14 years old and I'm in the 9th grade. I am currently an unschooled highschool student.

 

I think it's great that you are able to hang out with a wide variety of people within your school building.  But as for your friend who is currently homeschooled, isn't it possible that she wanted to lose contact with some of her old friends? I can understand that completely. Preferably I like to have a small group of friends that all know who I am and what makes me, me! Also, don't we all feel a little uncomfortable in environments loaded with people? I'm sorry that you think she missed out on a lot but, maybe from her point of view, you missed out on a lot too.

 

School provides you to work with people you like and don't like and every different kind of person you can imagine.

 

That's probably true, but everyday (even when you're out of school) you're stuck working with people you do and don't like. Are you honestly saying that children should like to be forced to be with people that they don't like every day? Seems like that'd be a really cruel thing to do to anyone.

 

This is getting long, lol. I'll address the other issues quick now.

 

1. You do learn how to complete assignments with deadlines when you're unschooled as well.

 

2. From another teenager's point of view, I am glad my parents didn't send me to a government school because I would hate to have been ordered to be with people every single day that I didn't like.

 

3. I agree with you, school is a vital part of any child's development. But ,I don't think you have to send them to a place where unpleasant things lurk in every hall for them to "learn".

 

I had to reply to this even though it seems to be between two young teenagers. 

First, It is good that you have a small group of freinds, everyone should have that.  You can have that, and still have many other freinds over and above the close ones.

 

Also, you said, it is cruel forcing children to be with people they don't like everyday!

 

This will someday happen to you, when you are older.  You will most likely meet and probably have to deal with, individuals you really are not fond of.  So, when this happens in your teenage years it is a little easier to make adjustments and know how to handle those situations.  Especially when I guess your doing it on " a regular everyday basis"

 

Also, I wanted to know what "unpleasant things lurk in the hallways of public school?

 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
December 1, 2006, 8:51 am PST

A Christian PS experience...

It's been implied on these boards (among other things) that PS children are exceptionally wild and rowdy using foul language daily and participating in other such delinquent things- drugs, sex, ditching.  I admit this is probably true and it's great that HS/US have pulled their children if this is the kind of neighborhood they live in- I hope they have moved as well.  I know I would.  Also, just a reminder that these type of things will never happen at the college level because University students are known for practing self-discpline and control- especially those who have never seen it before.  And I'm sure that a 15-16 year old, although brilliant, will make good choices in the face of any indiscretion.   Ask me, I'll tell you how a sheltered child handles those things. 

 

Anyhow, sarcasm aside, my 8 year old who attends public school just had a really eye-opening experience I wanted to share.  It not only made me and my husband have chills, it reinforced that teaching can and does happen at home and it sticks no matter what the environment.

 

You see, we are a Christian family and very strong in our faith.  Unshakable, really.  My son's classmate was showing him a stocking her late Grandma had made for her.  She then mentioned her Grandma was now "dead".  My son, shocked at the use of this word (we say passed away or passed on) managed to fellowship with another student and explained to her that her Grandma was still "alive as a soul".    This was an effort on my son's part to comfort and console his classmate.  The other student tried and so did my son to explain this to her but she was still upset and confused.  She ended up believing they were making fun of her Grandma and told on them.  My son and classmate were confused.    My husband and I explained to my son how to handle this situation differently in the future and all was well.  Should I pull my son?  NO WAY!  As Christians, the oppurtunity to fellowship and preach the Gospel can be anywhere and we were on our knees that night thanking God for showing us this through our children.  This type of experience only reinforces our choice for OUR public school.  True faith can withstand anything, anywhere.  Just thought I'd share what our PS experience is like. 

 
First | Prev | 250 | 251 | 252 | 253 | 254 | 255 | 256 | 257 | 258 | 259 | Next | Last