Message Boards

Topic : 11/24 Great School Debate

Number of Replies: 4215
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Friday, November 17, 2006, 12:57:50 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1
Parents want the best for their children, but what’s the best way to educate them? Dr. Phil’s guests face off in a debate about whether to school, homeschool or unschool. Dana and her husband, Joe, call themselves radical unschoolers. They say education happens as a side effect of life, and they don’t believe in tests, curriculums or grades. Are their three kids learning what they need to know? Then, RaeAnn says public schools are death traps and wants to homeschool her children. Her husband, Steve, says their kids are safer at school than they are at home. Can this couple reach a compromise? Plus, Nicole feels like an outcast at 26. She says she hated being homeschooled, and couldn’t relate to other kids. Share your thoughts here.

Find out what happened on the show.

More November 2006 Show Boards.

As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
December 29, 2006, 12:41 pm PST

Holidays...

Quote From: omgwhocares

Since you most likely do not celebrate this Holiday maybe you don't understand that my time is better spent elsewhere than on the computer.

 

Do you spend your time more wisely during your holiday?  I thought you were a christian, why do you celebrate a pagan holiday anyway? 

 

There are many things my hubby and I can't afford even with two incomes.  We'd like a bigger house, with a yard.  We'd like a newer car that needs less repair.  We'd like to have more in savings and more put away for retirement.   However, we realize what we have and are grateful so we continue working towards a better life for our family.  WORKING is the key. 

 

II'll give you a tip... investing is the key, not working.  As someone else suggested, you may want to take a personal finance/ tax planning course or at least read some books to educate yourself on the topic. 

 

 

"but the kids who are on welfare didn't choose it and they do deserve to eat and have shelter "

I agree witih this 100%...and shouldn't the people who bring them into the world do this? 

 

The problem is that not all parents do provide the very basics for their children.  Do you think the rest of society should not try to provide for them at all?  Is this an attitude of survival of the fittest or something? 

Well since you asked, no, my time is just more in demand with the Holidays.  I am a Christian and yes I celebrate Christmas.  We believe the birth of Christ is something to be happy about.  We believe the exchange of gifts teaches a valuable lesson- better to give than to receive.  Spending time with my parents is precious to me.  All in all, I will pray for those like yourself who are too wrapped up in the negative to see any good. 

 

As for my finances, you have no idea where I live, what I earn or how I spend so to pass judgment is really way off.  I was referring to people who take from the system and do not pay in.  Period.  If you dont'  understand this basic knowledge I again will pray for you.  FYI- to invest takes money...where does money come from initially?  For most, it's working.  Investing is much like gambling and  I don't think that's really a wise way to "spend" my money.  I prefer to save and be frugal.  My hubby and I are very proud of our "debt free" life (house excluded) and the steps we've taken to get there.  Most young couples with two kids cannot claim almost zero debt and an affordable house payment anywhere near our area. 

 

The attitude of providing for those who choose not to work is not one I share.  I do many things for my community and will help anyone trying to help themselves.    It's similar to the "making fishers of men" attitude.  For a parent to stay home, talk down to working families while they collect from the system the working pay into...yes, that's a problem.  It is rampant in my state and quite honestly I don't think I like paying for someone else's children while they look down on me.  It's not how I was raised and I won't raise my kids that way. 

 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
December 29, 2006, 1:07 pm PST

Taxes and two incomes....

Quote From: omgwhocares

Most homeschoolers (My good friend included) do not earn a check therefore no money is going into the system. 

 

Where do you get these statistics?  You may know this about your good friend but, most homeschoolers? 

 

 Yes her husband works but being that she stays home and has 3 kids his income is not taxed as heavily as my husbands with me working. This is common knowledge. 

 

How is your and your friends income tax common knowledge?

 

 Also, do you work and earn a check?   

 

Checks have no value,  do you mean income?  Of course I have income, but that has little to nothing to do with school taxes.

 

It's great the library and other services are available to your family although the percentage paid in is probably less that most "wealthy". 

 

Are you implying that you know my income or property tax situation?  Where did you get that? 

 

 I suspect most homeschool Moms do own homes due to the fact their husbands make enough to pay for that.  How many of those Moms actually have a job that earns a check? 

 

Does that make a difference?  If someone owns a home and pays property taxes, they are paying into the system.  Where the money comes from is irrelavant.

 

 We all work, I agree.  Not all of us earn a check.  My husband and I are I guess what they call the "working poor"- two incomes and just barely getting by. 

 

You previously claimed to have 200k in equity, that is hardly working poor. 

 

No, we do not have college degrees but compared to those who do we are all in the same boat. 

 

??

 

It's nice to know the ONE public system I pay for I can actually use. 

 

Do you not use public roads, parks, libraries, police, fire dept. etc.?  I think it would be  difficult to live in the States and not use public systems.  And why would you avoid others?

 

I believe we ALL benefit from an educated society. 

 

 

I pay governement taxes and state taxes (from my paycheck, earned while away from my kids) so I think I should be entitled to utilize those if I were so inclined. 

 

I also pay federal, state and local income tax, as well as property tax, and sales tax.  Why do you suggest homeschool parents don't do this?  It would be pretty much impossible to not pay taxes in the States.  Is your issue with the amount of taxes or the orgin of the income? 

 

I don't think that if a woman stays home (for whatever reason) she deserves some extra incentive to do so. 

 

What incentive are you talking about? 

Let me put it in a way so you can understand.  I am smart enough to see what you do and it really doesn't help your case much.  It just shows a huge level of immaturity.

 

TAXES- It is common knowledge for anyone who has paid income tax ever in their life that a single income family is taxed less severely than a dual income family.  If you earn income (as you claim) from work you do (ie- part time or Interent job) then taxes are taken from your earnings.  These taxes go to things like schools, roads, etc.  Property tax doesn't necessarily go to these type of things.  So, yes, you own a home but chances are the one income coming into your household is taxed far less heavily than a dual income house therfore less $$ your house pays into the system even if property taxes for your home and mine were equal. My issue is simply this- everyone should pay an equal share into taxes- a flat rate so to speak.  No one income should pay a bigger percentage than another.  This is not currently the case.  The "rich" pay a much higher percentage than I do and so on down the line.  ( This is not the popular opinion I know but again it's mine to have. ) So, yes, it is the amount paid into the system and how much you take out. and for what reasons.   You talk about having income and paying taxes - is that strictly from your husband's earnings or yours as well?  You eloquently avoid that making it sound very arrogant that what you do is invaluable to the world.  At this point, if I wanted to receive welfare assistance I could not.  I do not avoid public services I am just not entitled to use many of them.  This was in reference to your comment that I am abusing the system by using public schools.  As for sales tax, I'd be willing to bet that a dual income house has far more sales tax than a single income- maybe not. 

 

INCENTIVES- I have heard it suggested that women who stay home should somehow receive some form  of incentive from the government to do tso.  Either in way of acutal income (a salary ) or an equal type write off on their tax returns making  it more feasible (in theory) to stay home. This is in response to dual income families getting the deduction for child care exspenses that typically one income families do not have therfore do not receive at tax time.  How do you feel about this?  I'm truly curious.

 

Your posts are very interesting, however, I do not think you really understand what I am trying to say.  Maybe I'm not saying it the best way either. 

 
User Mood
Excited

Message Emote
blank
December 29, 2006, 3:46 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: kschmittz

Let me put it in a way so you can understand.  I am smart enough to see what you do and it really doesn't help your case much.  It just shows a huge level of immaturity.

 

TAXES- It is common knowledge for anyone who has paid income tax ever in their life that a single income family is taxed less severely than a dual income family.  If you earn income (as you claim) from work you do (ie- part time or Interent job) then taxes are taken from your earnings.  These taxes go to things like schools, roads, etc.  Property tax doesn't necessarily go to these type of things.  So, yes, you own a home but chances are the one income coming into your household is taxed far less heavily than a dual income house therfore less $$ your house pays into the system even if property taxes for your home and mine were equal. My issue is simply this- everyone should pay an equal share into taxes- a flat rate so to speak.  No one income should pay a bigger percentage than another.  This is not currently the case.  The "rich" pay a much higher percentage than I do and so on down the line.  ( This is not the popular opinion I know but again it's mine to have. ) So, yes, it is the amount paid into the system and how much you take out. and for what reasons.   You talk about having income and paying taxes - is that strictly from your husband's earnings or yours as well?  You eloquently avoid that making it sound very arrogant that what you do is invaluable to the world.  At this point, if I wanted to receive welfare assistance I could not.  I do not avoid public services I am just not entitled to use many of them.  This was in reference to your comment that I am abusing the system by using public schools.  As for sales tax, I'd be willing to bet that a dual income house has far more sales tax than a single income- maybe not. 

 

INCENTIVES- I have heard it suggested that women who stay home should somehow receive some form  of incentive from the government to do tso.  Either in way of acutal income (a salary ) or an equal type write off on their tax returns making  it more feasible (in theory) to stay home. This is in response to dual income families getting the deduction for child care exspenses that typically one income families do not have therfore do not receive at tax time.  How do you feel about this?  I'm truly curious.

 

Your posts are very interesting, however, I do not think you really understand what I am trying to say.  Maybe I'm not saying it the best way either. 

Let me put it in a way so you can understand.  I am smart enough to see what you do and it really doesn't help your case much.  It just shows a huge level of immaturity.

What is it I do? 

 

TAXES- It is common knowledge for anyone who has paid income tax ever in their life that a single income family is taxed less severely than a dual income family.  If you earn income (as you claim) from work you do (ie- part time or Interent job) then taxes are taken from your earnings. 

Why do you doubt I have income?  And where does the idea it's part time or internet work come from? 

 

The truth is that I am uncomfortable discussing my income or net worth, but it seems clear from your comments that my financial situation is not what you think it is.  But then I think it's difficult to really know anyone's personal financials without an audit.

 

These taxes go to things like schools, roads, etc.  Property tax doesn't necessarily go to these type of things. 

In the 4 states I have lived in, property taxes are the main source of funds the local schools.  One of these states has no state income tax, so they definitely don't get it from that. 

 

So, yes, you own a home but chances are the one income coming into your household is taxed far less heavily than a dual income house therfore less $$ your house pays into the system even if property taxes for your home and mine were equal. 

Who says my household is one income?  It's not.   So, you can't possibly know how much I or my household pays in taxes.  It's based on amount of income, not the number of sources. 

 

Example...a husband  with income of 50k  and wife with income of 50k will pay same taxes as a household where husband has 0 income and wife has 100k. 

 

Of course this is considering all deductions being equal etc.  Just a simple example.  It just isn't at all based on dual vs single income. 

 

My issue is simply this- everyone should pay an equal share into taxes- a flat rate so to speak.  No one income should pay a bigger percentage than another.  This is not currently the case.  The "rich" pay a much higher percentage than I do and so on down the line.  ( This is not the popular opinion I know but again it's mine to have. )

I am also in favor of a flat tax rate.

 

So, yes, it is the amount paid into the system and how much you take out. and for what reasons.   You talk about having income and paying taxes - is that strictly from your husband's earnings or yours as well? 

You must have missed this.  I have income, and I pay taxes.  Why is this so difficult to believe? 

 

And not that I have done any studies on this, but from my chats with many homeschooling parents, I'm fairly certain most of the moms have some income.  Not that I think it is important or necessary to have a paying job to be a good parent.  It just seems to be the norm.  That's why I would like to know why you imply otherwise. 

 

You eloquently avoid that making it sound very arrogant that what you do is invaluable to the world. 

How did I do this?  I honestly don't recall mentioning anything that would make you write this. 

 

At this point, if I wanted to receive welfare assistance I could not. 

Me either

 

I do not avoid public services I am just not entitled to use many of them.  This was in reference to your comment that I am abusing the system by using public schools. 

You're confusing me with another poster... again

 

As for sales tax, I'd be willing to bet that a dual income house has far more sales tax than a single income- maybe not. 

Sales tax is based on purchasing things so it is more likely related to level of income (rather than number of income sources)

 

INCENTIVES- I have heard it suggested that women who stay home should somehow receive some form  of incentive from the government to do tso.  Either in way of acutal income (a salary ) or an equal type write off on their tax returns making  it more feasible (in theory) to stay home. This is in response to dual income families getting the deduction for child care exspenses that typically one income families do not have therfore do not receive at tax time.  How do you feel about this?  I'm truly curious.

My opinion is that child care expenses should not be deductions.  This sort of goes along with the flat tax rate issue to me.

 

 

Your posts are very interesting, however, I do not think you really understand what I am trying to say.  Maybe I'm not saying it the best

I could be missing the point.  Sometimes I take things too literally. 

 

Are you saying that homeschooling is only a viable option for families that can or do live on one income?  And you have an issue with that?

 

 
User Mood
Excited

Message Emote
blank
December 29, 2006, 4:03 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: kschmittz

Well since you asked, no, my time is just more in demand with the Holidays.  I am a Christian and yes I celebrate Christmas.  We believe the birth of Christ is something to be happy about.  We believe the exchange of gifts teaches a valuable lesson- better to give than to receive.  Spending time with my parents is precious to me.  All in all, I will pray for those like yourself who are too wrapped up in the negative to see any good. 

 

As for my finances, you have no idea where I live, what I earn or how I spend so to pass judgment is really way off.  I was referring to people who take from the system and do not pay in.  Period.  If you dont'  understand this basic knowledge I again will pray for you.  FYI- to invest takes money...where does money come from initially?  For most, it's working.  Investing is much like gambling and  I don't think that's really a wise way to "spend" my money.  I prefer to save and be frugal.  My hubby and I are very proud of our "debt free" life (house excluded) and the steps we've taken to get there.  Most young couples with two kids cannot claim almost zero debt and an affordable house payment anywhere near our area. 

 

The attitude of providing for those who choose not to work is not one I share.  I do many things for my community and will help anyone trying to help themselves.    It's similar to the "making fishers of men" attitude.  For a parent to stay home, talk down to working families while they collect from the system the working pay into...yes, that's a problem.  It is rampant in my state and quite honestly I don't think I like paying for someone else's children while they look down on me.  It's not how I was raised and I won't raise my kids that way. 

Well since you asked, no, my time is just more in demand with the Holidays.  I am a Christian and yes I celebrate Christmas.  We believe the birth of Christ is something to be happy about.  We believe the exchange of gifts teaches a valuable lesson- better to give than to receive.  Spending time with my parents is precious to me.  All in all, I will pray for those like yourself who are too wrapped up in the negative to see any good. 

Thanks I can use some prayers.  I may have been too blunt, but I really was curious about this.

 

As for my finances, you have no idea where I live, what I earn or how I spend so to pass judgment is really way off. 

Other than you live in CA, and mentioned the size of your home and your equity... you are right, I know very little about your situation as you know little of mine.  But, you keep implying you know your household pays more taxes or a higher rate. 

 

I was referring to people who take from the system and do not pay in.  Period.  If you dont'  understand this basic knowledge I again will pray for you. 

Again, thanks for that prayers and I must have missed the point.

 

FYI- to invest takes money...where does money come from initially?  For most, it's working. 

Yes, as the saying goes "it take money to make money"  Which is how poverty winds up cycling.

 

Investing is much like gambling and  I don't think that's really a wise way to "spend" my money. 

No, investing is loaning money to people or companies that you think will utilize it to do or create something; where gambling is just a game.  I didn't mean to encourage you to spend money in an area you feel is inappropriate. 

I prefer to save and be frugal.  My hubby and I are very proud of our "debt free" life (house excluded) and the steps we've taken to get there.  Most young couples with two kids cannot claim almost zero debt and an affordable house payment anywhere near our area. 

Most American can't claim it at all.  And not to rile you up, but I have to ask about your word choice proud... isn't that a sin? 

 

The attitude of providing for those who choose not to work is not one I share.  I do many things for my community and will help anyone trying to help themselves.    It's similar to the "making fishers of men" attitude.  

That is a very good point

 

For a parent to stay home, talk down to working families while they collect from the system the working pay into...yes, that's a problem.  It is rampant in my state and quite honestly I don't think I like paying for someone else's children while they look down on me.  It's not how I was raised and I won't raise my kids that way. 

Ok, now I get where you are coming from on this.  This seems to be an issue all over, I doubt it's just your state or your situation.  I get really irritated when people look down on me for my choices with raising my children, and my career choices and that happens with relative frequency .  Really it's just none of their business. 

 

And yes its a double insult to be treated poorly by someone you are trying to help.

 

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
December 29, 2006, 4:05 pm PST

I think it's great if you succeeded in public school...

Quote From: manda7

I graduated last year from public school.  I had excellent grades and am now doing well in college where I am studying to be a nurse. I think that people are making excuses by blaming public school when students don't do well.  With any type of school, you get what you take out of it.  Most kids today are lazy.  Why don't we call it what it is!  I do not think it is the school's fault.  I was raised by a single, disabled mother, and I was able to take advanced classes while working and doing internships.  So when I hear public schools being blamed for students not passing even the most basic classes, I think maybe we should look at how much effort the student is putting in.  I went to school, payed attention, studied, and passed the classes.  There were also students who cut school, did not pay attention, did not study, and (surprise surprise) did not pass.  It seems very simple to me, each person is responsible for their own success.  We just don't like to take responsibility for our own actions (laziness), so we blame the school (laziness).  Life is not like private school or home school.  You get what you are given in life and you choose to either work hard for success, or be lazy and blame something else for your failure.

As for the people who are choosing not to educate their children at all, I hope they feel good about crippling them for life.  Regardless of their opinion about education, it is necessary in our society.  The best job you can get without some kind of higher education is at McDonald's.  They are sentencing their children to a life of almost certain poverty.  They should be ashamed of themselves.

But not everyone does.  I, too, am the product of the public school system.  I also graduated from college with a 4.0 GPA in Business Management.  But I graduated from high school in the lower half of my class.  Why?  One reason:  I spent most of my time and energy there avoiding harrassment and bullies.  I went to school sick to my stomach most days.  I could not concentrate and focus on the things that I should have.  Instead, I had to avoid certain hallways where the "jocks" hung out and rated every girl that walked by.  I avoided going to my locker, or the bathrooms at other times, because of who I knew would be there.  I spent so much time just trying to be invisible, or being afraid,  that there was no time, nor energy, to spend in active learning. 

 

When I got to college, I felt like I had died and gone to heaven!  I LOVE to learn.  And I didn't get harrassed by anyone there.  And I excelled.  My college years were some of the best in my life.  I have many good friends even now, who were made in college.  That was over half my life ago!  It made me wonder if I wouldn't have excelled in high school, had the environment been friendlier to those of us who didn't fit into any cliques or groups. 

 

It would break my heart to have no choice but to subject my two little ones to that kind of harrassment, 5 days a week, day in and day out, for 12 straight years.  It changes you, and not for the better.  Thank God for other options now!  I'm a homeschooler and we love it.

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
December 29, 2006, 4:13 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: julie1418

Crime and bullying do NOT come from the public school system. We don't teach that as a special elective class! LOL! Crime and bullying come from people - and from kids. It's not inherent to the institution of public schools. Just because public schools have to deal with the problems of undisciplined children doesn't mean they are the CAUSE of those problems.

 

While I do not argue that private schooling or even homeschooling may be the best choice for some families, I am a bit concerned over the idea that just any parent is qualified to educate his/her children. It is a VERY serious commitment that requires time, dedication, and ability. I cannot tell you how many children are returned to public schools after parents get bored with homeschooling, and the children are woefully behind not only in academics but in social skills.

 

I know there are many homeschooling success stories, but I think it is misleading to say that any parent will be able to be successful in this area. Some simply do not have the ability, the education, the time, or a full understanding of what is required. I disagree that EVERY parent knows what is best for his/her child. If that were true, we wouldn't have the problems we have today. I know a lot of great parents, but I also have met many who absolutely SHOULD NOT homeschool.

No, crime and bullying do not come from the PS system.  But they are there!  When you put that many kids into one building, with the minimal amount of supervision there is, there is going to be crime and bullying.  I'm not blaming the school system for the problems in these children (though I DO blame them for not finding a way to curb it), but I am also not willing to subject my own children to it, simply because it "isn't the school system's fault."  I don't care whose fault it is, frankly.  I care about giving my children an environment where they can learn without fear and harrassment.  And right now, that is at home.
 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
December 29, 2006, 4:16 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: omgwhocares

Let me put it in a way so you can understand.  I am smart enough to see what you do and it really doesn't help your case much.  It just shows a huge level of immaturity.

What is it I do? 

 

TAXES- It is common knowledge for anyone who has paid income tax ever in their life that a single income family is taxed less severely than a dual income family.  If you earn income (as you claim) from work you do (ie- part time or Interent job) then taxes are taken from your earnings. 

Why do you doubt I have income?  And where does the idea it's part time or internet work come from? 

 

The truth is that I am uncomfortable discussing my income or net worth, but it seems clear from your comments that my financial situation is not what you think it is.  But then I think it's difficult to really know anyone's personal financials without an audit.

 

These taxes go to things like schools, roads, etc.  Property tax doesn't necessarily go to these type of things. 

In the 4 states I have lived in, property taxes are the main source of funds the local schools.  One of these states has no state income tax, so they definitely don't get it from that. 

 

So, yes, you own a home but chances are the one income coming into your household is taxed far less heavily than a dual income house therfore less $$ your house pays into the system even if property taxes for your home and mine were equal. 

Who says my household is one income?  It's not.   So, you can't possibly know how much I or my household pays in taxes.  It's based on amount of income, not the number of sources. 

 

Example...a husband  with income of 50k  and wife with income of 50k will pay same taxes as a household where husband has 0 income and wife has 100k. 

 

Of course this is considering all deductions being equal etc.  Just a simple example.  It just isn't at all based on dual vs single income. 

 

My issue is simply this- everyone should pay an equal share into taxes- a flat rate so to speak.  No one income should pay a bigger percentage than another.  This is not currently the case.  The "rich" pay a much higher percentage than I do and so on down the line.  ( This is not the popular opinion I know but again it's mine to have. )

I am also in favor of a flat tax rate.

 

So, yes, it is the amount paid into the system and how much you take out. and for what reasons.   You talk about having income and paying taxes - is that strictly from your husband's earnings or yours as well? 

You must have missed this.  I have income, and I pay taxes.  Why is this so difficult to believe? 

 

And not that I have done any studies on this, but from my chats with many homeschooling parents, I'm fairly certain most of the moms have some income.  Not that I think it is important or necessary to have a paying job to be a good parent.  It just seems to be the norm.  That's why I would like to know why you imply otherwise. 

 

You eloquently avoid that making it sound very arrogant that what you do is invaluable to the world. 

How did I do this?  I honestly don't recall mentioning anything that would make you write this. 

 

At this point, if I wanted to receive welfare assistance I could not. 

Me either

 

I do not avoid public services I am just not entitled to use many of them.  This was in reference to your comment that I am abusing the system by using public schools. 

You're confusing me with another poster... again

 

As for sales tax, I'd be willing to bet that a dual income house has far more sales tax than a single income- maybe not. 

Sales tax is based on purchasing things so it is more likely related to level of income (rather than number of income sources)

 

INCENTIVES- I have heard it suggested that women who stay home should somehow receive some form  of incentive from the government to do tso.  Either in way of acutal income (a salary ) or an equal type write off on their tax returns making  it more feasible (in theory) to stay home. This is in response to dual income families getting the deduction for child care exspenses that typically one income families do not have therfore do not receive at tax time.  How do you feel about this?  I'm truly curious.

My opinion is that child care expenses should not be deductions.  This sort of goes along with the flat tax rate issue to me.

 

 

Your posts are very interesting, however, I do not think you really understand what I am trying to say.  Maybe I'm not saying it the best

I could be missing the point.  Sometimes I take things too literally. 

 

Are you saying that homeschooling is only a viable option for families that can or do live on one income?  And you have an issue with that?

 

She's probably talking about people like me. Stay at home moms. Moms who don't work. She has an animosity towards SAHM's....it's as old as the pyramids...LOL

I don't understand her logic. I don't work, so no, I don't pay taxes, my husband pays taxes, but we don't really need more money than he makes...so why should I work? Just so I can pay taxes? Why?

It makes no sense...

"And you have an issue with that?"

Yes, she has an issue with one income families...
 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
December 29, 2006, 5:03 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: mammato4boys

Well, I sent an email to Dr. Phil's staff formally requesting the research to which Dr. Phil is referring. I never received an answer. I cannot find ANY research which even slightly suggests what he has said. If there really is "a lot of research" I would love to read it.

 

Perhaps I am wrong, it wouldn't be the first time. BUT, this reminds me a bit of the common "facts" thrown around about homeschooling which are proven time and time again to be false.

"A lot of research", by definition should be easy to find.

But here is where I show my non-conformity to common western thought.  I don't need "research" to back anything up.  Majority opinion (and majority "results" and "research") has stopped swaying me a long time ago.  2 of my children have passed those "precious" middle school years and they are healthy, happy, social, and connected to their parents.

Our western culture says, "Put the kids somewhere", whereas many families I've seen have opted out of that mentality and have shone greatly in their own blooming of their lives.

One of the things which has been inspiring in my homeschooling journey is seeing families who actually like each other while at the same time exhibit extremely healthy personal growth, unlike any other.
 
User Mood
Cheerful

Message Emote
blank
December 29, 2006, 5:12 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: teacher247

But not everyone does.  I, too, am the product of the public school system.  I also graduated from college with a 4.0 GPA in Business Management.  But I graduated from high school in the lower half of my class.  Why?  One reason:  I spent most of my time and energy there avoiding harrassment and bullies.  I went to school sick to my stomach most days.  I could not concentrate and focus on the things that I should have.  Instead, I had to avoid certain hallways where the "jocks" hung out and rated every girl that walked by.  I avoided going to my locker, or the bathrooms at other times, because of who I knew would be there.  I spent so much time just trying to be invisible, or being afraid,  that there was no time, nor energy, to spend in active learning. 

 

When I got to college, I felt like I had died and gone to heaven!  I LOVE to learn.  And I didn't get harrassed by anyone there.  And I excelled.  My college years were some of the best in my life.  I have many good friends even now, who were made in college.  That was over half my life ago!  It made me wonder if I wouldn't have excelled in high school, had the environment been friendlier to those of us who didn't fit into any cliques or groups. 

 

It would break my heart to have no choice but to subject my two little ones to that kind of harrassment, 5 days a week, day in and day out, for 12 straight years.  It changes you, and not for the better.  Thank God for other options now!  I'm a homeschooler and we love it.

This was my experience in college, too.  I went out for coffee on the first day of meeting someone, and I kept thinking "If this is a dream, I hope I am in a coma".

I made friends there.  Real friends, who talked to me and hung out at my house and I at theirs... stuff most people take for granted, I was experiencing for the first time ever at 19.  No cliques with rules where I had to be clairvoyant to figure out what the criteria was, no fake stuff, and my hair was bubble gum free :)

No school "prepared" me for this!  And yes, I homeschool because I don't want my children to wait until age 19 to live the kind of life most people only dream of and fantasize about for 12 years.
 
User Mood
Relaxed

Message Emote
blank
December 29, 2006, 5:14 pm PST

11/24 Great School Debate

Quote From: kschmittz

Let me put it in a way so you can understand.  I am smart enough to see what you do and it really doesn't help your case much.  It just shows a huge level of immaturity.

 

TAXES- It is common knowledge for anyone who has paid income tax ever in their life that a single income family is taxed less severely than a dual income family.  If you earn income (as you claim) from work you do (ie- part time or Interent job) then taxes are taken from your earnings.  These taxes go to things like schools, roads, etc.  Property tax doesn't necessarily go to these type of things.  So, yes, you own a home but chances are the one income coming into your household is taxed far less heavily than a dual income house therfore less $$ your house pays into the system even if property taxes for your home and mine were equal. My issue is simply this- everyone should pay an equal share into taxes- a flat rate so to speak.  No one income should pay a bigger percentage than another.  This is not currently the case.  The "rich" pay a much higher percentage than I do and so on down the line.  ( This is not the popular opinion I know but again it's mine to have. ) So, yes, it is the amount paid into the system and how much you take out. and for what reasons.   You talk about having income and paying taxes - is that strictly from your husband's earnings or yours as well?  You eloquently avoid that making it sound very arrogant that what you do is invaluable to the world.  At this point, if I wanted to receive welfare assistance I could not.  I do not avoid public services I am just not entitled to use many of them.  This was in reference to your comment that I am abusing the system by using public schools.  As for sales tax, I'd be willing to bet that a dual income house has far more sales tax than a single income- maybe not. 

 

INCENTIVES- I have heard it suggested that women who stay home should somehow receive some form  of incentive from the government to do tso.  Either in way of acutal income (a salary ) or an equal type write off on their tax returns making  it more feasible (in theory) to stay home. This is in response to dual income families getting the deduction for child care exspenses that typically one income families do not have therfore do not receive at tax time.  How do you feel about this?  I'm truly curious.

 

Your posts are very interesting, however, I do not think you really understand what I am trying to say.  Maybe I'm not saying it the best way either. 

I have to reply even though it's not directed at me...

 

<<<It is common knowledge for anyone who has paid income tax ever in their life that a single income family is taxed less severely than a dual income family. >>>  No, as I explained to you earlier... If my husband makes 70K per year and we have two children we will be taxed EXACTLY like you are if you make 35K and your husband makes 35K and y'all have two children.  You do not know what you are talking about.  In my state, our PROPERTY taxes pay for schools - NOT the income taxes.  Property tax also helps to pay for our libraries and other community needs.  Sales taxes usually pay for roads, but not in all states or counties.

 

TO YOU, it is common knowledge that money is taken out of your paycheck.  Well, if you so desire, don't have the money taken out...it still won't change the amount of income tax you will pay in the year.  Double the amount of tax that comes out of your check and you STILL will not change the amount of tax you pay in the year.  What you have here is common misconception - not common knowledge!  You are clueless so you should take that tax class or not speak of something you know absolutely nothing about.

 

Sales tax is based on what you buy - not how many hours you work or how many people in the home bring in an income.  If you buy more crap than I do then you should pay more tax!  If I am poor with one income and you are equally as poor with two, you may buy more than me...it's not fair that you get the goodies and we both pay the same tax!

 

As far as incentives, I think the government should keep their big fat noses out of it and not offer any incentives for how a person chooses to raise their child.  I don't think anyone should get a reward for paying someone else to do the job either. 

 

If you think the rich pay too much tax, you are more clueless than I thought.  Rich people (or their friends) make the tax laws, they make them to benefit them - one way or another.  It is the very poor who pay NO tax at all but they have no income.  It is the working poor and the middle class who pay the most when you compare earned income to tax ratios.  The system is broken, I'll give you that but it does NOT work the way you think it does.

 

You talk about "taking out of the system".  I don't understand what that means.  I use the library and I drive on public roads but I do not and will never again use the public school system.  I work, as does my husband but he pays the bulk of the taxes because he earns the bulk of the income but as a family, the income is shared, so is the tax.  Income tax is based on income, it is the same for EVERY American family - no matter of how many people earn the income.  If the family is living at what the government considers a poverty level, then the family gets a tax break.  It has resulted in a lot of dishonesty and theft, so what the government has done is the opposite of teaching anyone to fish.  Yep, it's that kind of stupidity that keeps me from sending my kids to a government school - ever!

 

The incentive you mention for childcare is for single-income or dual-income families. Again, it does not matter how many people in the family earned the income - if you pay someone to care for your kids, you get to take it.  It is limited for those who are considered wealthy by the governments standards but otherwise, if you didn't pay child care then why should you get to take it? 

 
First | Prev | 299 | 300 | 301 | 302 | 303 | 304 | 305 | 306 | 307 | 308 | Next | Last