Topic : 11/28 Jeremy Returns

It is blatently obvious that this smug jerk is hiding something and you can base that just by the cocky look on his face and the whole way he conducts himself.

I feel that he should at LEAST be supervised during visits. I don't care if he did it or not, if it's even a QUESTION, he should be supervised.

The only thing that troubles me, in the episode today when the mother was talking about how Kaylee was reddened after coming back from a weekend with Jeremy, why didn't she take pictures for evidence? That would've been my first instinct. Take pictures and document the evidence you have against him.

     Hi Ya'all!  First off, I want you guys to know I'm a military wife, so I believe deeply in the ideas of justice, fairness, and the opportunity to be the best possible person you can be.  During our second tour in the NAVY I went and trained to do In-home daycare.  I had a federal daycare license as well as extensive training in locating abused children. 

     Having said that I am in a state of shock and disbelief.  This situation with Little Kaylee is unbelievable.  I truly believe in my heart that someone is lying here.  On one hand:  Where's the physical evidence.  No hymenal damage?  How can there be penetration with a penis if there is no damage internally?  No vaginal bruising?  No one has talked about vaginal bruising, why not?

AND YET:  the man failed a lie detector test?!  ARE YOU KIDDING ME?! 

How can you believe a man that is a SELF-ADMITTED STATUTORY RAPIST?

     He, himself admitted that he "dated" a 14 year old girl when he was over 21.  It doesn't matter that they went on to create their precious child, Kaylee.  How do you date a 14 year old girl?!  Is the date an afternoon at the playground?  Answer me that!  On this one fact alone he should be kept as far from his daughter as possible!  At the very least until his story is proved or disproved however the case may be.

     Why can't the custodial parent sign a release on the privacy act form for Kaylee's case and find out what CPS is thinking about the situation and what the next steps for them are in regards to her daughter?

     I'll tell you honestly as a mother that I would rather die then send my kids back to the lion's den.  But I understand the catch 22 of the situation.  Children's testimonies are notoriously unreliable  due to coaching by a parent(s); lacking in understanding of what is actually going on; and more.  But if a child says, "someone touched my pee pee."  then by all means it should be investigated exhaustively.  I know that there is no easy solution to this problem.  Maybe they both need to be away from Kaylee or under supervision with her until this issue is resolved.  But the father should definitely be under supervision in her <kaylee> presence.

Thanks for listening, Ya'all.

Morgan 

I watched every show about this and will watch it tonight..............he did do it there is no doubt in my mind.  Anyone that needs to think for 2 min about if he put his tounge in his daughters mouth to feed her cake has a serious problem. I hope they never let that little girl around him again.......Keep up the good work Dr.Phil

I am to the point that I could care less about any of these adults. I have issues with the grandmother, having to do with why her 14 year old daughter was dating a grown man, I have issues with the mother for coaching Kaylee to say she was abused, and I have issues with the father, because he seems to enjoy causing all this painful doubt in his ex more than he is interested in proving his innnocence.

I want to think about what can be done for Kaylee. How she can be kept safe. I'm not sure what is going on with the child protective agency and the judge involved, other than being as frustrated by the adults involved as I am. But something must be done for Kaylee, no matter how irritating they may be.

What about a doctor who will examine her IMMEDIATELY before her visitations as well as IMMEDIATELY after, since the mother has already proven to be untrustworthy? Then it wouldn't be about the mother's word that her private area appears red after her visits to her father. It would be an independent, professional opinion. Someone who would be jointly chosen by both parents, could be called on to appear in court and be believed by the judge.

This would be good for 5 reasons: 1 - The father could be caught if he's guilty. 2 - The pressure would be off the mother and grandmother to try to find viable evidence. They are not professionals. 3 - If the father is guilty it may be preventive if he knows a doctor will be looking at her and speaking to her right after her visits to him. 4-  The mom may have more peace of mind if she knows she is doing something pro-active. Who can blame her for acting as crazy as she is when she honestly thinks her daughter is in such terrible jeopardy? Any one of us would be insane with anger and fear. 5 - The father is so shifty and guilty looking that he needs help if he's innocent. He needs somebody independent and professional who can say for a fact that Kaylee is OK after her visits to him.

Dr. Phil, you look so fed up with them all, please don't give up!