Topic : 11/28 Jeremy Returns

I would sit in jail too to keep my kids safe, BUT Kaylee would have gone to Jeremy for the 15 days she was there. That wouldn't have been good. That whole court deal should not have happened that way. It was the courts fault that he wasn't made to have supervised visits.

I know Krista, and Boni have made a lot of mistakes, and they haven't done things correctly either.They made me mad today, but all you have to do is listen to Jeremy for 2 minutes and you can tell he is lying about something.

A: he his being accused of a nasty, evil, and sick crime of his own KID B: his ex Wife wants to destroy him C: he knows that once a person is aaccused of hurting a child you life is over and no room to start over   D: mods and sick people with views like you can make any one have a nasty attitude.   When I was in foster care I for one never could have a normal life while still in the state's care. I had a really nasty attitude and was always on the sefensive with people when they found out about my LDS back round I fore one am an athest(sp) because of people like you who want to forgo the proof and want to condem people and get mobs with pitch forks and torchs to go after people because of hear say or such things.   now for me I see my self as a wise person and a honorable person so I tend to try to stay in the gray but its hard when people want to just say guilty when their not.

he's been convicted on the streets by these women without a fair trial, his relationship with his daughter has been virtually ruined, he has to go on national television to defend himself from a crime that has absolutely not been proven, and he has to put up with flyers all over his town making statements that could turn out to be false, yet he will undoubtedly pay for them no matter the outcome!  Wouldn't YOU have an attitude?

I complety think that this father is guilty. He can't answer a single question with a straight answer, he always tries to turn the attention on him into what he thinks the mother is doing wrong. I don't think  innocent until proven guilty should apply when it come to child molestation, if there is any doubt about someones innocience. I also dissaguree with Dr. Phil about the good job that CPS is doing. Being in the child care profession gives you a chance to work with these state employees and I have had a problem with every single one. They were not professional, and if everybody with a job took as much time accomplishing something as these people have, nothing in this world would every get done.

How do you explain the little girl clinging onto her mother, so that she did not have to go with him. That is not acting. Did you hear her cry? That doesn't sit at the bottom of your stomach? What kind of a person does this to a child...and what kind of person defends these people?

The little girl is crying out for help and you can imagine the fear she has to go through going to her dad's but the judge not listening to the mother is what anger's me. I have a friend that is going through a similar incident, she has a little girl that she was fighting custody for, again this was in Michigan. The mother was from Arkansas but had moved to Michigan with her husband, her mother was having a lot of medical problems and this woman was having marital problems, going through counceling, etc. She went back to Arkansas to help her mother taking the little girl with her, while in Arkansas, she decided to stay because her little girl had asthma really bad and she didn't have any problems whatsoever living in Arkansas. She had been in Arkansas for 6 months, in the meantime the father of the child came to Arkansas with an order from the court to take the little girl back to Michigan. The mother of the child filed papers in Arkansas for custody but since he filed in Michigan first, Arkansas gave jurisdiction as to which state would handle the custody case, naturally the father won. This lady had to drive from Arkansas to Michigan every other week to court hearings, etc. The judge finally gave the father custody and told the lady if she wanted to share custody, he could have the baby one week, her the other, and so on and so forth. It is over 500 miles one way to travel to Michigan. If she didn't drive back and forth she would be in contempt of court  so the lady had no choice but to move back with her husband in order to be in the child's life! I don't know if all Michigan judge's are this uncaring for the sake of the child or not but listening to the case of this child, the judge is not concerned with the safety of the child as did the judge with my friends case, how unstable would that type of environment be being passed from one to the other every other week, what in the world is wrong with the Michigan judicial system! My friend living in the United States of America was forced to live in a state she didn't want to live in just because a judge had the control of three lives that he had no idea would be affected by his decision. I just hope the judge can live with himself and this judge as well when this   child's life depends on his decision.

The mother of this little girl oozes hate out of every pore of her body. I wouldn't trust her any further than I could throw her. It's obvious she would go to any length to hurt someone she feels has wronged her. Is Jeremy guilty? Only he knows that. But this mother is emotionally dangerous to her child. She's a publicity-hound and  vengeful beyond imagination. I think SHE could use some psychiatric intervention.

Being a person who was abused when she was little. i dont feel in anyway that the child is not being honest. The child is not being coached by her mother and grandmother.   the same thing happen in my hometown and the plice arrested the guy after it was to late, he had attacked other girls and killed one of them.  Jeremy needs to be arrested and put in jail for taking the innocence of a little girl.

First I want to say to every one that is involved with this case that I realize that you may not agree with what I have written here but that I am doing my best to look at this from an unbiased point of view and that I truly do not wish for any child to be hurt.  I also want every child to have healthy and good relationships with both of their parents if possible.

I think that in order to truly find out what is going on the child should be sent to live with non - biased family members and/or with a foster family for a period of 3 months. 

During that time the father should be subjected to supervised visits so that no further damage can be done.  The mother and grandmother should go through the same supervised visits so that mom and grandmother cannot influence the child. 
 
If during the supervised visits the child still complains about current behaviors from daddy with mommy even though the visits were supervised a counselor should be brought in to speak with the whole family. 

If the child says nothing more about being hurt by daddy lately but tells the foster parents of past problems without coaching then investigation of the matter should be done immediately.

Trained specialists should be brought in to watch Jeremy with his daughter at play to look for mannerisms which could lead to touching in a setting that is not being closely guarded. 

I have not heard in all of this any classic mannerisms from the child that would suggest molestation.  How does she play with other children?  Does she touch other children in play that would be considered bad?  Does she act out?  Are there extreme lows and highs with her in one sustained environment even though she should be happy and playing?  Does she get angry and lash out physically?  Does she actively seek out attention or does she sulk and not want to be hugged at all? 
 
Disclosure?????
If Jeremy disclosed his use of RX drugs to the lie detector test person why was it not made note of in the beginning.  Wouldn't he be given the information ahead of time.  If it truly would affect his test would they even allow it?  Why is it that the father saw his child and visitation with her to be so important that he would drink so close to having such a test while being on medication.