Topic : 11/28 Jeremy Returns

I can definitely see your point on taking pictures for evidence but the way things seem to be going in this case...she probably would've been charged with child pornography then!!  I do believe that if there is ANY suspicion that a child COULD have been molested or abused then there should definitely be supervised visitation at least for a certain length of time!  It confuses me as to why they aren't taking that into consideration and just letting it happen??

  The one point that was never made during this show was that Krista anbd Bonnie would not have escalated this and continued to rabble rouse if Jeremy had agreed to supervised visitations.  He agreed to it on the first show and then went back on that promise.  If I was this child's parent, I would never allow my child to go into Jeremy's home without supervision.  It is crazy to me that at least this requirement has not been mandated by the courts.  Here is a child that is actually verbally complaining about being molested.  I am a teacher and my experience has been that most children do not or can not verbally explain what has happened to them and often molestation or abuse is found through a change in behavior or in their play.  This child is actually telling people she was molested and still action isn't being taken!  Imagine if she was just playing sexually with her dolls, no one would be listening.  I agree that it isn't fair to punish Jeremy until the courts can make a final conclusion.  But the reality is that this is "he said, she said", so until they can get to the bottom of this, there needs to be supervision to keep Kaylee safe.  That is the least that can be expected.  Dr. Phil keeps saying that Krista needs to calm this down...but under the circumstances, I think she should be yelling even louder!  Whatever it takes to keep Kaylee safe.

Jen

from BOTH parents. Am I the only one who heard this mother, on camera, speaking the child and referring to her father as 'Jeremy'? Not DAD? Am I the only one who has heard of alienation? And the grandmother just telling the child don't worry?  I love you so much, just remember that? TRY to have a good time at 'Jeremy's'. That child may or may not be the victim of molestation - but she is certainly the victim of alienation. And they may never get to the bottom of what happened if the alienation and confusion of this child doesn't stop. She will be so confused she won't know what happened, if anything.  I don't believe for one second that Jeremy - who seems like a REAL jerk - is molesting his daughter after having been on the dr phil show and in court. he is not going to cause her physical harm when all eyes are on him. its too convenient that this mother can't reproduce the childs victim claims when the cameras are rolling (dr phil cameras). she's happy, smiling. but when they leave she is crying and making adult statements? both parents need supervised visitation until they grow up. i'm wondering how the other children's fathers are fairing w/ this mother and grandmother.

We need to stop electing liberal Judges who don't want to take sexual abuse seriously.  In the last few years judges all of sudden seem to think they have all the power to do whatever they want. This judge in Kaylees case should of temporarily made Jeremy have supervised visits. If the court system truly have the "childs" best interest it is better safe than sorry. Also, we should hold judges and CPS accountable for not protecting our children. The scum bags that are raping our children get away with it because they can.  They know that the court system doesn't want to offend anyone.  Child molesters are NOT rehabilitative.  Jeremy will do it again.  He will be more secretative more sneaky about it since he knows he can get away with it..  As a country we need to start standing up and not allowing things to happen. Child molesters need to be put away for life.