Quote From: dhcp1000Of course you are discreet. Women have been cheating the system for a long, long time. Honestly, how long did you guys think you could keep up this charade? It might have taken 2,000,000 years, but science finally caught up with you. The jig is up, girls!
In 2001, David P. Barash from the University of Washington published "The Myth of Monagamy" in April 2001. In this book, he demonstrated that many so-called monogamous species were in fact not monogamous at all. The females were cheating.
Human females are no different. Estimates vary, but genetics labs estimate that as many as 20% of children being raised in the U.S. are unknowingly being raised by fathers who are not their biological fathers. (Oh oh. I hear church elders rolling over in their graves!)
There is a genetic disposition to doing this. It ensures the biological diversity of the human species. It benefits all of us - men and women. The fact that it exists is proof of its biological utility. If it wasn't, it wouldn't have survived two billion years of evolution. Darwin was right.
Now, if we can only learn to accept the fact that monogamy is a myth, and change our social institutions and mores to accomodate this fact then I think we will all be happier. Unfortunately, I won't live long enough to see this, but my prediction is that marriage, as an institution, will be dead in 200 years.
Come to think of it... perhaps fidelity, and marriage as an institution, were invented by men as a way to subjugate women in an effort to curb their infidelity. It could be all a fraud. Think about it. Who invented it? Who's been pushing it down our throats for 2000+ years? The church! Who has been running the church for 2,000+ years? Men.
PS - You raised an interesting point about "society's obsession with how women look". Consider that there is a genetic disposition for this as well. You know those little C-G-T-A sequences in our DNA? Them little buggers are smarter than we think!
A surgeon I am friendly with told me that his vasectomies have a 30% failure rate. He said that after the procedure, he tests and if the result is negative for active sperm, the man is sterile. Yet he has up to 30% of these men returning and asking to have the procedure performed again because they believe they have caused a pregnancy-in spite of a new test again showing no active sperm!
He said that he has repeated the surgical procedure-entirely unnecessarily (which is an ethical violation) just to allow the man to continue to believe since he clearly needs to so badly.
BTW-marriage doesn't need to die. I have been in an open marriage 22 years and it is very successful. Our children have a stable, happy home and we are an economic partnership that won't be broken and split up. It just takes honesty.