Message Boards

Topic : 04/12 Twin Tug of War

Number of Replies: 849
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Friday, April 06, 2007, 11:39:40 am
Author : DrPhilBoard1
Allison Quets made headlines around the world when she allegedly kidnapped her 17-month-old twins across the border into Canada this past Christmas. She had given them up for adoption, but did she do so under duress? She now says she suffered from a pregnancy disease called hyperemesis that left her malnourished and sleep deprived to the point of complete exhaustion. See an exclusive interview with Allison from behind bars where she awaits trial on two counts of international parental kidnapping, with a possible sentence of three years behind bars. Then, look inside the life of a woman who is only three-and-a-half months pregnant and so sick with hyperemesis she spends most of her day on the bathroom floor. Plus, find out what all women need to know about hyperemesis: How you get it, how to know you have it, and whether it could kill you or your unborn child. Join the discussion.

Find out what happened on the show.

More April 2007 Show Boards.

As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 15, 2007, 2:11 pm PDT

04/12 Twin Tug of War

Quote From: kathmandu

Sorry, but that woman is wacko. I experienced HG with both of my pregnancies, with my two kids. I was hospitalized several times, was put on various meds and eventually on bedrest. Yes it was a miserable time, difficult on many levels, but at no time did I EVER consider putting my kids up for adoption.....NEVER. Just too strange for words. People can't go doing things like she did and think that because she is the children"s mother, that she should be excused. That is illogical, nutty thinking. Being a biological mother does not autonamtically make you a "good" "sane" or "safe" person to raise your kids.  My vote is she be prosecuted and sentenced for kidnapping and child endangerment.  I do feel compassion for her but I also have more compassion for her children and the adoptive parents.

My compassion is for the kids as well.  Allison clearly displayed 'illogical, nutty thinking' that went well beyond HG.  Too many people are making excuses for her.

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 15, 2007, 2:18 pm PDT

04/12 Twin Tug of War

Quote From: cashee

"A raving, unstable woman can seem like a monster to a tiny child."

 

What in the world gave you the impression that this woman was "raving"? I'm sure Allison did not have the energy to rave.

 

Allison spent time with her children for 48 hours, every few weeks... she had visitation rights. From the pictures that were taken with Allison and her children together, I really don't see how anyone could think these children viewed their mother to be "like a monster".

She was raving when the attorney took the documents she signed.  And, she had enough energy to kidnap her children and take them to another country, leaving the adoptive parents frantic.  Also, the children didn't know her that well at that time ~ they were probably feeling bewildered and lost, missing the home that they knew.  She demonstrates no regard for the law and no regard for consequences.  I don't think she would necessarily physically harm her children, but I'm sure the five days was difficult for them psychologically ~ they had to be wondering where their adoptive parents were and they had no way to voice their feelings.  Alison's actions are unpredictable and those babies are tiny and vulnerable.  Since she is unstable, she's unpredictable. Whatever the cause, she's not well now.  Listening to her speak, I got the impression that she'd have no problem ripping the children up out of the home they knew right this instant and carrying them off someplace, without any thought as to how upsetting that would be to them or the fact that she may not be able to take care of them.

 

As sorry as I feel for this woman, I put the kids first.

 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
April 15, 2007, 2:20 pm PDT

04/12 Twin Tug of War

Quote From: astrid07

This disease sounds truly awful - it is sad that anyone has to deal with such illness and such losses. What I do not understand though - did she make the choice to give up the babies while pregnant or afterwards? How long after you give birth does this disease make you unable to make coherent choices (how long for a return to health)?

If someone is deemed legally unable to make rational choices for themselves because of this illness (that is what is being suggested, in order to make these legal documents she signed invalid), should that person be left making choices for their babies on a daily basis, without some kind of aid or medication? This would concern me. If someone was suffering a mental illness that diminished their reason to the point that they were not legally able to make choices, a proxy or someone else would have to make choices about the children I would think? I am not sure how this works, but I would be concerned.

How was she coerced into giving up her babies? It does not seem like there was anyone forcing her. Were they harassing her, or showing up at her home? What is this ex boyfriend like? I don't understand the coercion part.

While there may not be a cooling off period for adoption (for babies under 6 months), she came back three days later (the same amount of time given as a cooling off period for babies over 6 months) and signed the papers again. Is the problem that three days is not enough of a cooling off period?

I guess I feel bad for the adoptive parents, I cannot imagine investing the sort of love it takes to raise a child only to have that child taken away. The children do not understand why they were suddenly taken to away from the people they have bonded with and the experience must have been traumatic. I know adoptive parents and their daughter really loves them. There is no doubt in the girl's mind that these people are her parents and love her, and to be taken away from them would be truly upsetting for her.

 

 

.... I guess I am wondering at what point a person with this illness is considered competent again, and if they are incompetent to make legal choices is it best to leave them to make choices about their childs care at all until they are deemed well?
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
hopeful
April 15, 2007, 2:20 pm PDT

04/12 Twin Tug of War

Quote From: astrid07

This disease sounds truly awful - it is sad that anyone has to deal with such illness and such losses. What I do not understand though - did she make the choice to give up the babies while pregnant or afterwards? How long after you give birth does this disease make you unable to make coherent choices (how long for a return to health)?

If someone is deemed legally unable to make rational choices for themselves because of this illness (that is what is being suggested, in order to make these legal documents she signed invalid), should that person be left making choices for their babies on a daily basis, without some kind of aid or medication? This would concern me. If someone was suffering a mental illness that diminished their reason to the point that they were not legally able to make choices, a proxy or someone else would have to make choices about the children I would think? I am not sure how this works, but I would be concerned.

How was she coerced into giving up her babies? It does not seem like there was anyone forcing her. Were they harassing her, or showing up at her home? What is this ex boyfriend like? I don't understand the coercion part.

While there may not be a cooling off period for adoption (for babies under 6 months), she came back three days later (the same amount of time given as a cooling off period for babies over 6 months) and signed the papers again. Is the problem that three days is not enough of a cooling off period?

I guess I feel bad for the adoptive parents, I cannot imagine investing the sort of love it takes to raise a child only to have that child taken away. The children do not understand why they were suddenly taken to away from the people they have bonded with and the experience must have been traumatic. I know adoptive parents and their daughter really loves them. There is no doubt in the girl's mind that these people are her parents and love her, and to be taken away from them would be truly upsetting for her.

 

 

Astrid,

From my previous posts you would gather that I have my own firm opinions.  However, you bring up good, honest questions.  I truly appreciate how you posed them in a non-offensive way.  That always opens the board for constructive debate.  I'd like to debate with you in a friendly way.  I'll copy your questions and follow with my replies.

 

What I do not understand though - did she make the choice to give up the babies while pregnant or afterwards?  Allison stated that she first considered adoption when she was 7 months pregnant.  That would be at a time of serious devastation physically. 

 

How long after you give birth does this disease make you unable to make coherent choices (how long for a return to health)?  Post-partum recovery for an HG sufferer can take 6 mo. to 2 yrs.  However, there are many cases of secondary health issues that are either chronic or take much longer to "cure."  PPD and PTSD are also common and can be severe in post-partum HG patients.

 

If someone is deemed legally unable to make rational choices for themselves because of this illness (that is what is being suggested, in order to make these legal documents she signed invalid), should that person be left making choices for their babies on a daily basis, without some kind of aid or medication? This would concern me. I totally agree with your here, well stated.  I believe Allison needed physical support in caring for these twins while her body recovered, as well as, emotional support in dealing with PPD and/or PTSD.  Many women receive that type of help while caring for their new babies.  Sadly, others do not.  Admittedly, I would like to see Allison be reunited with her children but with aid in dealing with emotional trauma,  Even if there was none before, there most certainly is now after her stay in jail while separated from her children. 

 

How was she coerced into giving up her babies? It does not seem like there was anyone forcing her. Were they harassing her, or showing up at her home? What is this ex boyfriend like? I don't understand the coercion part.   Allison's claim, and hospital documentation should support this, is that she was in a weakened state after her children's births.  She was allegedly driven to the attorney's office and kept there (she was driven) for 5 hours before signing and withdrawing the papers.  Five hours is a pretty long time for anyone, let alone a physically weak person.  If she was there for a total of 11 hours, which is what is claimed, that's 6 more hours.  She stated that she was physically too weak to carry both babies and infant carriers out of the office.  Three days later, she signed again only to attempt to withdraw the papers 8 hours later through a different attorney.  She was probably in the same physical condition at that time. The coercion that many feel took place has to do with her weakened state and obvious indecision.  She stated that she wanted the best for her babies and was not sure if she was physically capable of caring for them.  I do not know what the boyfriend was like.  She did not speak ill of him.  However, I believe he was the one who drove her to the attorney's office and did not immediately offer to take her home when she was unsure of her decision.

 

While there may not be a cooling off period for adoption (for babies under 6 months), she came back three days later (the same amount of time given as a cooling off period for babies over 6 months) and signed the papers again. Is the problem that three days is not enough of a cooling off period?  Wow, that's a really great question!  In my mind, I can't see that 3 days is enough.  And, I say that as someone who has been looking into adoption myself.  I'd love to see strong evaluations and support given to people considering placing children for adoption before it ever gets to the point of signing papers.

 

I guess I feel bad for the adoptive parents, I cannot imagine investing the sort of love it takes to raise a child only to have that child taken away.  You do sound like a compassionate person.  I feel for them also but question how much they knew of Allison's indecision.  If there was any knowledge, and maybe we (the general public) will never know, then my compassion for them goes right out the window.  I'm a strong advocate of parental rights for adoptive parents and birth parents.  It's such a sad situation all around.

 

 

 

 

 

 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
April 15, 2007, 2:34 pm PDT

why again?

Quote From: ohplease21

Ok,

 

First of all to all of you who claim to have suffered from HG.  IF it is SO awful (and maybe it is, I don't know) WHY ON EARTH would you keep getting pregnant after delivering a healthy baby?  So many of these posts are "I had HG too, it is so awful, I had it with all 15 of my babies".  Of course I am exagerating, but you get my point.  It apparently wasn't bad enough to dissuade you from doing it again.

 

Second, Allison was not suffering from this disease any longer when she signed the papers....so HG can not be used as an excuse for giving her babies away.  Did ANYONE ELSE on this board griping about the misery of HG place their babies for adoption?  No?  Didn't think so.

 

Third, she kidnapped the children 16 MONTHS later.  So, you are going to tell me that HG made her do that too?

 

Fourth, for all of you spouting the children's "blood right" stay with Allison even though she is obviously unstable, the children were conceived with donor eggs and donor sperm.  SO, if you want to look at it that way Allison is not their "parent" either.  I wonder what the genetic parents would think of this situation if they knew.  Who THEY would want raising these children.

 

Fifth, the adoptive parents are likely not going public because they have nothing to gain by doing so.  They are fighting in a court of law, not the court of public opinion.  They did nothing wrong, why should they have to go on national television and defend themselves?

 

Feel free to keep belly aching about how horrible this "disease" is, I am not saying it's not.  My point is it must not be THAT bad or women would not go through another pg after suffering through it once.  My personal opinion, surprise surprise, is that it is too bad they are only charging her with parental kidnapping.  She should be in prison for life after what she did, but instead she will likely only serve 3 years.  If she gets those children back, it will be a travesty.

let's try and analyze for a while why we women with HG want so many kids
I have 3 kids and had HG with all of them, and I am considering to become pregnant again
It is actually quite puzzling why I want it.
I am a PhD in psychology and do fundamental research on motivation, emotion, and consciousness. I think motivation theory provides some clues: Goals are typically more activated in the face of obstacles. I other words, people want things more when they do not come easily. There are many examples of this in daily life (just look at kids that want to play with toys that are not availbale or more difficult to attain vs. the toys lying around. or look at people's ambition to build a career that asks too much of them).  I think that this principle might be part of the answer to the puzzle. Another part of the answer has to do with characteristics of  conscious experience. I know I suffered last time, that is, I have memories of relentless vomiting and wretching, but I do not feel it right now. Compare it with a hangover. You know you're going to vomit the next day, but you don't feel it right now and you somehow have the illusion that you'll be able to handle it ... until you're hanging over the toilet, promising yourself never to drink again. It is the same with delivering without epidural. I remember that it was the most painful experience in my life and I felt I was going to die, and yet, I did it again. Does that mean that it wasn't so bad after all? no, it has to do with the way our consciousness is built. We are able to remember events and the thoughts we had, but when you're not nauseous at the very moment, you cannot experience it in all its details. I guess there has to be some functionality in this. People would never go through painful experiences again and not many women would have another child if they were able to fully reexperience the painfulness of delivery. Last but not least, women with HG, as do most other women, are so in love with their children that they want more children in their lives.
As we are not able to fully reexperience HG in our minds, it is even harder for people who never experienced it to imagine it.  To have HG is like being tortured, not by another person but by nature. It is pointless to  compare HG with other forms of physical or emotional pain, just as it pointless to compare different methods of torture on prisoners.
It is equally pointless to ask whose pain is worse, that of the adoption parents or of the birth mother.  But adoption policy in florida is totally crazy, no?




 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
hopeful
April 15, 2007, 2:52 pm PDT

Hyperememsis

Twenty seven years ago I gave birth to my first child after having hyperememsis. It was a horrible experience. Two years later I gave birth to my second son with the same experience. Needless to say, I had no other children.

Back then the solution was to isolate a person in a hospital room with no stimulus. When I went into the hospital I was out of town visiting my parents. The doctor would not let my parents visit me because they said only my husband could come, which was impossible since he was working in another city. It was not a great experience. I was there for a month. No tv. Dark room. No blind open. I just laid there and counted the holes in the tiles on the ceiling.

I am glad to know that an organization and support groups are now available. My sons are both healthy individuals now contributing to society. I would like to get involved with a support group to help others through the experience.

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 15, 2007, 2:54 pm PDT

911 Tape says it all

Quote From: busyparents

The HER forum has a post about their founder being involved in this case for a long time.  I'm sure she would have given info to the attorney. Was it just ignored? It sounds like Allison was very sick and looked like death. Who could ignore that - I'm sure her medical records would show that. How can they ignore that and a 911 tape that obviously shows there was definitely pressure on her. Good grief. Give her kids back and put this to rest! It is doing NO one any good to drag it on. There are so many kids in need of a home - let the Needhams take one of them that NEEDS a home. Maybe that is too much work and time. It's easier to find someone like Allison who is too sick to fight back.

 

 

 

 

 

AMEN!!

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 15, 2007, 2:57 pm PDT

04/12 Twin Tug of War

Quote From: justnancy

My compassion is for the kids as well.  Allison clearly displayed 'illogical, nutty thinking' that went well beyond HG.  Too many people are making excuses for her.

I think the taking of the kids was a call for help. Her experience through the pregnacy might have been worse then yours. I, too, had hyperemesis. It was not a good experience and did effect my life in many ways. I am sure the court systems will work through all the legal aspects and the children are the ones who need that decisions settled. Otherwise, they, too, are going to have many problems due to this situation.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 15, 2007, 3:21 pm PDT

04/12 Twin Tug of War

Quote From: astrid07

.... I guess I am wondering at what point a person with this illness is considered competent again, and if they are incompetent to make legal choices is it best to leave them to make choices about their childs care at all until they are deemed well?
Most women who have HG are competent.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
April 15, 2007, 3:22 pm PDT

04/12 Twin Tug of War

Quote From: justnancy

She was raving when the attorney took the documents she signed.  And, she had enough energy to kidnap her children and take them to another country, leaving the adoptive parents frantic.  Also, the children didn't know her that well at that time they were probably feeling bewildered and lost, missing the home that they knew.  She demonstrates no regard for the law and no regard for consequences.  I don't think she would necessarily physically harm her children, but I'm sure the five days was difficult for them psychologically they had to be wondering where their adoptive parents were and they had no way to voice their feelings.  Alison's actions are unpredictable and those babies are tiny and vulnerable.  Since she is unstable, she's unpredictable. Whatever the cause, she's not well now.  Listening to her speak, I got the impression that she'd have no problem ripping the children up out of the home they knew right this instant and carrying them off someplace, without any thought as to how upsetting that would be to them or the fact that she may not be able to take care of them.

 

As sorry as I feel for this woman, I put the kids first.

I heard a woman scared and pleading for the papers back so that her babies would not be taken from her.
 
First | Prev | 62 | 63 | 64 | 65 | 66 | 67 | 68 | 69 | 70 | 71 | Next | Last