Quote From: busyparentsLet's see - take advantage of a woman who was ill, refuse to do the right thing and give them back when she changes her mind immediately and the 'adoptive' parents have not yet signed or filed the papers - less than 24 hrs later, then bring trauma on the children by taking them from the mom they have bonded with for over 10 months (9 months before birth), refuse to allow the mother visitation as the court said, then keep fighting in court for years until the mother cracks and ends up in jail out of a desperate attempt to 'protect her kids'... Now keep the kids because this has been going on so long --- oh and send the mother away to either be childless or try and adopt a child of her own. Oh wait - she can't - she is broke from the legal bills and totally devastated. The Needhams now have 3 kids, and Allison - none (well, actually minus 2). Gosh, that seems like justice to me - don't you think!?! NOT! That is not logical or rational!
That is exactly what keeps the money in the adoption firms hands - taking advantage of mothers who can't fight back or litigating it until the mother breaks or is broke financially. It's a hard reality, but go to some of the adoption sites and read about this practice - or read some of the books on adoption. It's a tactic they use intentionally. I have done some digging in order to understand this case, and I tell you - this is just another case adoption 'professionals' don't want to lose - especially now that it is in the media.
If they can't make the natural/biological mom look crazy and unstable (even when she is not) -
they lose public support. They don't want to be seen as villains - they want to keep their image as hero's who save babies from abusive or incompetent mothers.
But... Now there is Allison... Let's take this mom who is older, has (or had) money, and did fertility for an intentional pregnancy -
NOT your stereotypical mother giving up a child for adoption. She doesn't fit the profile -
people can't 'judge' her for being poor, young, underprivileged or whatever they expect a mom to look like. This makes it harder to accept taking her babies away and saying it is for the best.
There is no justifying this removal of kids. So, how do they get people to buy into this 'adoption' -
there is no reason to say this is ok except some ridiculous technicality of the law that was probably put there by someone who benefits from adoption - or someone makes money from these situations.
People must realize that there has to be some other issue causing her to make a decision most of us wouldn't. There has to be more to this -
a mom doesn't go through fertility for years then give up her kids without some pressure or threats - those obviously did not last after she signed since she said no immediately. Can anyone shed more light? Maybe that boyfriend? Probably not since he was driving her there. However, it sounds like he didn't want her to have the kids since he took her there. Anyone know why? I wonder if the 'adoptive' parents pressured her? Or, we go back to the attorneys since that seems to be what other women say - they were coerced.
Somehow, in order to keep the kids, the family with the kids has to make Allison look like an unstable nut case so they will keep the kids -
even if it is wrong to do so. Oh and along the way,
don'
t allow visitation so she goes weeks without visits - and feels intensely desperate to be with the kids she is
scared of being in the hands of people who may not have their best interest in mind (evidence - they would not return them when she asked them immediately - that is cruel). When she finally can't take it anymore and probably feels she won't see them again, she runs -
what pretty much any scared mother would do - and then she is portrayed as crazy and a kidnapper. I see their logic, but it's cruel logic. Her act of running - right or wrong - is not an unusual thought in that situation. I ask what you would do.
Oh and did anyone notice how many other missing kids are out there - many - sadly! Why are the parents who abducted them not in jail or being pursued by the FBI? Seems strange that
this mom is getting the royal treatment by law enforcement. Check out
missingchild.worldpress.com - they have some interesting articles on this mom. One mentions that astronaut in TX who is facing 3 felonies - she is out on bail, but this mom is still in jail. Why? Seems odd to me. Ideas anyone?
I feel we do have to take a step in her shoes before we judge. For some reason only she can say,
she strongly felt the kids needed protection. Doesn't someone want to ask why? I wish she had said on the interview. I want to know. She w
aited over a year and a half for the court to settle this - and it's still going. Why doesn't everyone (besides the other family) see this huge injustice to her?
I was neutral at first but have read and watched this long enough to see the big picture and can't believe our court system is not resolving this before the lives of this mother and her twins are forever severed - or they are traumatized terribly. As a mom, I can't imagine not being with the kids I went through so much to have. I would feel desperate and frustrated and confused. I don't know what I would do. But I
'm not sure I could sit and wait for years while my kids grew up and I was missing more and more of their lives and losing more connection with them. They are her kids. Is that not our right as a parent - to raise our kids? Maybe she was sick at the time, but that doesn't give others the right to take them away forever. Give her treatment and give her kids back. She is their mother.Time is ultimately irrelevant in this case - you don't right a wrong by doing something else wrong - what is the point of having a justice system then? Hey Everyone! If you go to the website link that in is red on this post...you will read the most amazing articles on details surrounding this case...I love it when other people think like I do! Thanks for posting that!