Quote From: confuzzledwifeThis Bonnie is a nut- I don't believe her.. surprised Dr. Phil said "you don't seem the type to whore around".. Can Dr. Phil be that blind? I could see right through her- it's always the ones that don't look the type ... you can see it in her eyes, she's nuts.. why did she quit her job as a teacher if she had nothing to hide? So what if she had to be investigated- if she had nothing to hide, she should have just done what the school wanted, instead- she quit.. that shows me guilt.
Another thing, I think she's jealous over him getting back with his ex. I believe she swung that baseball bat around- I know people like this... they look so innocent.. but they are master manipulators.. am I going to be sued now? heh
Yeah the guy's quirky.. but I believe him- he had every right to tape record her phone conversations.. if she had nothing to hide this wouldn't be a problem- she's a psycho.
Bonnie is not a "psycho or a nutcase" Charles recording Bonnie's or anyone conversations without their permission cannot be used in court. "You can see right through Bonnie?" And Dr. Phil is "Blind." You can see what in her eyes? Whose the Nutcase? If you listen carefully -- the allegation was Bonnie swung Whiffaball bat in the grocery store. A Whiffaball bat is not a "baseball bat." It's soft plastic [harmless]. bat. However, this action was denied by Bonnie. I know people too, who will make up stories without any validity to whatever they tell others. Charles for one!
Our Constitution and its laws protect everyone from being maliciously Slandered by liars whose intent is ruin someone's reputation by deformation of their character. The only defense to Slander is proof that any statements made are the truth. None of Charles statements were found to be true but lies, at trial.
As an example to the damage that can be done by Slander to anyone who has been falsely accused is there are always those people, who will continue to judge an innocent person, because they can "see quilt in their eyes" that proves they are guilty" and also calls them a "psycho and nutcase." And this is after a jury has found the defendant [Charles]-- guilty of making false-statements and guilty of Slander, The Court awarded damages to Bonnie due Charles lies and actions. Charles continued to Slander Bonnie -- on this show. Didn't you see or hear these same lies repeated by Charles to millions of viewers on this show.
As for your opinions "that Bonnie is jealous, etc. And so what if she was investigated, etc.," if she is innocent she has nothing to hide. " I'm sure every allegation Charles made against Bonnie -- was investigated as part of Discovery Process by Bonnie's Attorney and Charles attorney before the trial, and found to be false and untrue at trial. By Charles own admission his attorney withdrew their representation. In sum -- his attorney dumped him. Attorneys are also officers of the Court. No attorney is going to represent or defend anyone whose guilty of Perjury, for starters.
Dr. Phil is not blind. I suggest you get your eyes and hearing check. Next, thankfully you weren't a juror. The law doesn't operate on someone being able to "see guilt in anyone eyes". It operates on facts and evidence, only. If Bonnie was blind and eyes were covered by dark glasses -- then you would have found her creditable because you couldn't see her eyes? By the way -- What do "guilty eyes" look like? Are they orange and yellow and blinking off-and-on "I'm guilty" like a traffic light! Your logic used here is totally absurd.