Message Boards

Topic : 12/25 Parent Trap

Number of Replies: 3786
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Friday, October 26, 2007, 02:49:00 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1

(Original Air Date: 10/29/07) Fraud. lies. conspiracy. They may sound like the latest Washington scandal, but these are allegations of exes at war over child support. Dr. Phil's guests claim they became victims of the perfect crime when they were led to believe they fathered a child that was not biologically their own and were forced to pay. First up, Enrique says he was shocked and angered to discover he was not the father of his youngest daughter, Selina, and that she was conceived during his ex-wife, Maria's, adulterous affair. Maria says he raised Selina but then abandoned her to save money. Why does Maria say Enrique's current wife is to blame for the fractured relationship? Next, 13-year-old Selina speaks one on one with Dr. Phil. Will she decide to let the man she once called Daddy back in her life? Then, Carnell Smith, who uses the online moniker, "Man4Justice," suffered a similar fate to Enrique, and but he fought and won. He says he's tired of seeing women trap men and get away with it. A heated debate ensues between him and feminist attorney, Gloria Allred, who argues that men like Enrique should continue to act as the father ... and continue paying! Talk about the show here.


Find out what happened on the show.


As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 13, 2007, 8:12 pm PST

I have Another Idea!

 

 

           I just read the boards again and I see that a lot of people are being victims on both sides of

           this issue.  Over 3,300 people have responded on this subject.  Over half have been victim in

           one way or another.  Why doesn't the Dr. Phil show(On a follow up) start to let some of the

           politicians(We have an Presidential Election Next Year) know how much of a hot bed issue

           this is.  The one common goal everyone has is something need to be done.  I am willing to

           work on this in California.  Is there anyone else who feel the same way?

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 13, 2007, 8:43 pm PST

I was wrong on the Web Address

Quote From: softballgirl87

 

  I saw most of the messages on this subject and I am going to say a couple of things.  Everyone except

  Selena and Dr. Phil whom was on the stage was wrong to degrees(They were wrong in at least one  

   point.)

 

     1. On the Show a man quoted an saticistic(Sorry about the spelling) that 1 in 3 parenity test come out 

         A negative result for the father.  This is all over our country. The women who do this know they are

        wrong.  They might have been wronged by the second saticstic.

   

     2.  Out of everyone in the United States whom is a single parent, only 20%(You can check this with your

          DCSS(Department of Child Support Services) of the parent who have a child support order are 

          recieving the court ordered support from the non-custidial parent.  That means that 80% of the 

          parents who have court order child support are not recieving it.   You can go to an website called

          ACES(Association of Child Support Enforcement) to learn about it's founder and how she changed

          the laws to where they are now.  WWW. ACES.org

 

     3.  In California(Where I live and I am part of the 80% not recieving their court ordered child support)

          As was stated on the show, you can only get a parenity test if both party agree or if it is court ordered.

         I also have a default judgement.  At any time between birth and when the child is eighteen, the birth

        father can request a parenity test ( In the State of  California).   I am more than willing to give my child's

         father a parenity test because I know who her father is.  He on the other hand has not taken

         advantage of it.  He would rather say the child is not his to friends and family and not pay the support.

 

    4.  I think that many of the women whom do this know how many women get  wronged in this situation

         where the Non-Custodial parents can create children and still not pay for them(at least in California).

         

    5.  My solution-  We start at the state and work to the federal level.  Make it against the law for the

         following items:

 

         A.  If you are a parent (or mom in this case) and you try to make the father pay support  and you

              know that the person is not the parent and it can be proved, that it should be fraud and pushiable

              by jail time and fines.  If the Mother discloses the facts before the DNA test is taken then she

              should have to pay back any child support that she has recieved.

 

         B. Parents not paying child support is part of this problem also.  Therefore, I believe the following 

             should happen:  Right now if a Non-Custodial parent get almost a year behind(In California again)

              the case can be taken back to court and after three visits the Non-Custodial parent can spend up

              to 40 days in jail.  We need to change this.  Make it that if a  Non-Custodial parent falls more than

             $1,000.00(if one child and adjust it accordingly) behind No matter the state , make it punishable by

             Prison time of  a year or more first offense. 

 

       As American's we don't put up with children being abused.  In both cases, these are children being 

       abused.  We would not stand for parents not feeding, puting clothing, or not protecting there children.

       Why are these cases any different?  Please feel free to respond. 

 

 

 

         

 

 

           The Web Address for ACES has been change.  It is www. childsupport-aces.org

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 13, 2007, 9:01 pm PST

I can explain a little of it

Quote From: car1av

 In Item #3, you stated, "At any time between birth and when the child is eighteen, the birth father can request a paternity test (in the state of California).   Perhaps a "birth father" can "request" a paternity test; however, a court in Colorado (where the child and his mother live) and a court in California (where the supposed birth father lives) have both DENIED DNA paternity testing for my son-in-law and his ex-wife's child, whom he believes is not his.  A court in Colorado ordered he pay child support, and a court in California is taking action to collect on behalf of Colorado.  If the child IS his biological child, he would step up and take responsibility.  However, as long as he is denied the truth, provable through testing, he will be a "deadbeat dad."  One has to wonder -- WHY IS DNA TESTING DENIED????

 

       I can explain a little of it.  I am not a lawyer but, I am getting very educated in the subject.

       It Sounds like he is being caught up in UREAS act.   A Child Support case is open in the

       State where the Child resides.  From that point(Once the case has been opened), The

       state where the case has been opened has control.  So even though California says that

       a Parenity test can be given at anytime while the parent is paying support, they would go off

       of Colorado's laws because that is where the child resides.  If your son's Ex moves to another

       state, then she would have to open up another case and go by their laws.  He can watch to

       see if she moves.  Or he can move to Colorado and keep fighting.  I know the choices stink but

       he will have to get a lawyer to see what his options are.  UREAS Act is the federal law that

       allows states to go after Non-Custodial parents whom aren't paying Child Support.  Before

       this act was put into effect, Any time Non-Custodial parents didn't want to pay support, they

       would just have to move to another state and they would be free(in the cases where the child

       was really theirs.)  In the state of California, they have an On-line system where you can ask

       questions about the laws.  Have your son do a seach to the DCSS office in his area and he

       should find the office from there.  Good Luck!

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 13, 2007, 9:20 pm PST

I'm sorry this happen to you

Quote From: opfvictim

I found out almost two years ago that one of the two children I was ordered to pay support for was not biologically mine.  It's the toughest thing to realize that you have been deceived and in my case deprived the visitation and holidays and summer vacations for a lot of years.  Now it's easy for you to cast judgement, but I have almost 5 years worth of case documentation drawn out over the last 10 years trying to secure normal visitation, only to be alienated from the children, frustrated by a court system and grand parents who garnished my rights of vistation to that of their own.  Now we find out she known all along.  We also know she's willing to cooperate with the CSEA in that town if I drop the civil litigation.

Imagine getting relief from a child support order, but have the system turn around and make you pay more for one child.  Looks like the ex-wife was rewarded for her deceit and fraudulent activities.  Keep in mind, yes I make more money, she doesn't, but owns a house and 4 cars, of which one is a Lincoln Avaitor, on sefl reported income of no more that 15,000 a year for the last 14 years.  Does that make sense to you?  What are we to think of a woman who systematicaly lies to children and then lies to the court system to commit the perfect theft and then still tries to garnish wages from me for a non biological son.  The system is broke, I am proud to pay support, not proud that I am divorced and taken advantage of by the system itself.  Sincerely a victim of paternity fraud and parent alienation syndrome in Ohio.

 

     You are right.  The system is broken.   It does need to be fixed.  You said what are we to think of

     a women who systematicaly lies to children and then to the court system to commit the perfect theft

     and still tries to garnish wages for a non- biological son or child?  The same thing we think of a

     Non-Custodial Parent  whom knows they have father a child and won't pay child support.  The same

     thing we think of a mother whom has been order to pay child support and doesn't.  People need to

     realize that when the politians talk about where are tax dollars go, a very large amount goes to

     families whom would not be on welfare or other social services programs if the Non-Custodidal

     parents did their part.(I do very much exclude the people whom are saying they are wronged by

     fraud and the ones where they are not parents to the child. I don't want to insult someone if they

     are .)  The one thing both cases have in common is they are both abusing the children

     and they are both commiting fraud(in my opinion).

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 14, 2007, 8:14 pm PST

10/29 Parent Trap

Quote From: softballgirl87

 

 

           The Web Address for ACES has been change.  It is www. childsupport-aces.org

" 2.  Out of everyone in the United States whom is a single parent, only 20%(You can check this with your

     DCSS(Department of Child Support Services) of the parent who have a child support order are 

      recieving the court ordered support from the non-custidial parent.  That means that 80% of the 

      parents who have court order child support are not recieving it.  You can go to an website called

      ACES(Association of Child Support Enforcement) to learn about it's founder and how she changed

      the laws to where they are now.  WWW. ACES.org"

 

ACES did not indicate 20% payment from non custodials. Or, I did not click on the link indicating this. But most states listed under their CS resources, are well under 50%. Please do not take this in a defensive way, that is not the intent. We all need to work together to help fix the problems. And there are many.

 

 I do agree with you, the system is very broken. And many parents ARE paying support and it is not being adjusted correctly in the system. Big media event a few weeks ago about a state employee bringing this out in the open. She found many discrepencies throughout her states records. Fathers who were paying support and it was not getting to the CP. She also found many overpayments, but NCP was still found to be in default.

 

I have to wonder if this situation were reversed, if Selena's mother would pay the support under these circumstances. Another very disturbing point is, this woman has tainted other mothers, just like one bad dad makes every dad a 'deadbeat.'  Many dads are just 'conveniently removed' from any access to their child and this result just adds to the non payment issues.

 

And the father in New Mexico who paid support for 5 years on a child who did not exsist.

 

Anyone wishing to educate themselves on the real problems in the system should read thru some of these sites. When Mothers are ordered to pay support, they are further in default than fathers.   Both fit parents should be held responsible for raising a child, financially, morally, educationally, spiritually, etc.   scroll to page 71 for a more accurate percentage of NCP's [mothers] receiving support. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getdoc.cgi?dbname=108_green_book&docid=f:wm006_08.pdf   http://www.nfja.org/newsrelease/2007-07-31.shtml   http://www.childrensjustice.org/stats.htm   Someone else posted the upcoming elections. Ask any of the candidates and you will find this subject 'taboo'. Could it be the Federal incentives that are in place?
 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
quiet
November 15, 2007, 6:26 pm PST

Shame of it all

The really sad bit of this show that I found was that the poor dad was copping alot of flack about leaving the daughter, and that the daughter blames the man she calls dad for leaving but not once that i saw did she say anything about the mum lying about paternity .  Yeah sure I can understand why he doesn't want to pay child support -  Not his child why should he pay but I have 2 children from a previous relationship whos natural father doesnt have anything to do with them and I have always instilled into them that your dad is not the one whos genes you come from but the man who has bought you up and given you love and been there for you.  They know who their biological father is and they call him either father or by his name but dad is their stepfather who has raised them.  This is the thing I dont understand about this case , the man who brought up the girl, showed her love, taught her right from wrong just gave her up because she is not from his dna.  I really dont understand it.  The other thing I dont understand is why the daughter isnt angry with her mum for lying all those years.  I am sure if she had been honest from the start things would not have got this out of control.    As usual it is the child who wrongfully suffers for adult mistakes.

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
angry
November 15, 2007, 7:14 pm PST

My Opinion

 We are behind in the stories that we get from Dr. Phil, however today's show was in regard to Paternity fraud.  As much as I realize that perhaps the man who thought that he was the father went the wrong way around telling his "daughter" it would never have come to this result if the Mother had been responsible and admitted the truth in the first place.  As for children looking like the biological parent, it isn't always so as I have 3 children, my son (adopted) is an exact replica of his father, walk talk laugh all the same, even down to washing a perfectly clean plate before they put food on it.  I was married to my adopted son's father, this child was conceived before we were married but born after.  That is the choice that I made which was to be his parent.  My two biological children look nothing like me, in fact to is hard to realize by looking at us that we are related.  Yet they are the dead ring of each other.  I think that this women, the mother is absolutely in the wrong, she would have know that there was a possibility of the child being someone elses.  I think that she should pay back the past child support, chase up the biological father and get support from him.  However, since she is remarried maybe her new husband can take care of the family financially at least he knew what he was getting himself in for when he married her.  As for the lady lawyer on the show, I guess that if she was working for you it would be great, however, I think that she is wrong as MEN do have rights, and they also have the right to the truth.  I am sorry for the daughter who was abandoned, but I still blame her mother, what else was told to the daughter when the divorce went  through.  I am sure that she is also not blameless in the way events turned out.  Again I will say, if she had been truthful in the beginning none of this would have eventuated....For the greed of money, that is what I see from the mother....especially when the father was paying support until he learnt the truth.  It is a shame that we don't all have degree's in the right or wrong with kids but am sure that others can learn from the show.  Kids I agree need to be protected...this mother is the wrong doer.
 
User Mood
Mellow

Message Emote
blank
November 15, 2007, 7:36 pm PST

I pity the child

I believe the mother (Maria) was completely reprehensible for not telling her husband that he may not be the father of a child conceived during their marriage.  Enrigue should not have told his daughter she was not his, he should have sought professional help first.  From watching some of the shows we get here in Australia the US appears to have no shortage of psychologists or counsellors he could have consulted before confronting a child with an adult issue.  Ultimately  the person to suffer €the most in this silutation is Selena.  Maybe Maria should have thought ahead to what would happen when her actions were found out.  I guess we must think differently in Australia, because I would never be able to do something so vile to a man I married or a child of mine.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 15, 2007, 7:40 pm PST

My side of the pancake

 Yes it is a tragedy and the child's interests are very important.  BUT, don't you think that it is important for someone to help Enrique deal with his feelings of hurt before he tries to jump back in there as the father figure.  All through the show noone acknowledged the shock, feelings of betrayal etc. that must have been there when he found out he'd been lied to. 
They said that he should have asked.  But if he did others would say that he lacked trust.  In fact, he trust was abused and Maria wrote on the form that he was the father.  Whether people think she knew or not, by writing that on the birth certificate she made a declaration that he was the father when in fact he was not.
Women don't have this confusion.  For all the ups and downs of pregnancy at least women can be 100% sure that it is their baby because it comes from them.  Sadly men don't have that luxury.  Can you imagine finding out that a child is not of you.  Yes you still care for that child and have shared important and meaningful experiences with that child but as they say blood is thicker than water.
All I'm saying is that you can't just pass him of as having made his decision on the basis of money.  He was violated by Maria, used and had his trust abused and there was nothing in place to give him the support he needed to deal with the issue.  
 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
November 15, 2007, 7:43 pm PST

10/29 Parent Trap

I just saw this show on Australian tv today and i'm discusted in both partys.  I am a child from a broken family and i lived with my father and my step mother cause my mother didn't want the responsibility and i personally believe that the man who raised her for the first 11 years or so of her life should know that he has been a major part of her life and that whether he was the father or not he should have known that she considered him as her "dad".  So when he found out he wasn't the dad he shouldn't have abandoned her like that.  He should have stuck to his bond with her and played that role anyway for "the childs needs" even if he was feeling angry and confused.  My mother had visitational rights to see me however i still classed the woman who raised me, (my step mother) to be my mother my whole life.  Of cause every child likes to no who their biological parents are but there is more to parenting than just bio chemistry!!!

 

I am just as deeply discusted in the mother for so cunningly keeping that secret for all that time!!!  She took wedding vows and i am a firm believer of being faithful or taking responsibility for your actions and she is just as responsible for these actions.  The child and the so called father had a right to know the truth so she is just as much to blame for all the hurt and anger caused upon both the child and her ex husband.  THAT'S NOT BEING A GOOD  MOTHER!  No child likes to be lied to believe me!  My mother was just like you and cheated on my father during their marriage however i firmly believe that if i was to find out that my dad was not my father it wouldn't make a difference to me cause he raised me and loved me as if i was his own and thats all that matters in reality to a child and thats what being a parent is about!  I have grown up now and lived and learnt from my family situation, you as a mother wanna hope your daughter gets through this whole mess and forgives you both cause what you've done is a pretty bad thing.  It IS all about whats best for the child and the child should have known from the start who her father was and been given the chance to make decisions for herself as to whether or not she gets to know him even tho she has a father figure in her life. 

 

As for the child support, i believe he shouldn't have to pay it seein as he is NOT the father however if he loves the girl then he should support her by being there for her STILL and if you want to then freely paying support is an option, but not to the mother but paying for things for the child such as school fees or buying her clothes the kind of thing that will ONLY benefit the daughter.  NO ONE should have to pay for somebody elses mistakes and so the mother now needs to take the responsibility and if she wants child support FIND the father and ask him.

 

Dr phill your right when you say adult problems SHOULD NOT become the childs.  They are not emotionally equiped nor do they have the life experience at that stage to deal with issues such as child support and deception to marriage vows.  I hope alot of people out there learn from this and do the right thing by their husbands and children.  Deception to a child like this will never be forgotten by the child and will scar the child for the rest of thier life. 

 
First | Prev | 333 | 334 | 335 | 336 | 337 | 338 | 339 | 340 | 341 | 342 | Next | Last