Message Boards

Topic : 06/24 Banned from the Wedding, Part 2

Number of Replies: 1897
New Messages This Week: 0
Last Reply On:
Created on : Tuesday, November 20, 2007, 06:04:42 pm
Author : DrPhilBoard1
(Original Air Date: 11/27/07) Dr. Phil follows up with a family torn apart when the mother was banned from her only son’s wedding. The bride-to-be, Michelle, said she’d rather burn in hell than let her future mother-in-law, Jane, attend the ceremony, and her fiancé, Jay, stood behind her decision. This sent the entire family into a tailspin, with the best man resigning, the aunt disowning the groom and the wedding planner on alert to call 911 if Jane showed up. The big day has come and gone, and everyone returns to update Dr. Phil with the latest. Were they able to bury the hatchet before the wedding? Jane has gone through a rollercoaster of emotions, and Dr. Phil finds out what has her so mad at him, she even wrote him a scathing letter one week after her appearance. Has Jane done a 180-degree turn since? Has Michelle stopped her “campaign of hate mail” as Jane called it and opened up her arms to her husband’s mother? Share your thoughts, join the discussion.

Find out what happened on the show.

As of January, 2009, this message board will become "Read Only" and will be closed to further posting. Please join the NEW Dr. Phil Community to continue your discussions, personalize your message board experience, start a blog and meet new friends.

User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 30, 2007, 7:21 am PST

Unhappy with Dr Phil?

 

Many people have expressed disappointment with the way Dr Phil handled this show. 

 

There is a pattern.  There have been several shows this year where one of the family members is unyielding, controlling, and manipulative.  These people exhibit either Borderline personality Disorder or the more severe Narcissistic  Personality Disorder.   Dr. Phil never recognizes these people as the major cause of ongoing turmoil in these families.  He may call the person a "Drama Queen"  or Toxic, or a Right Fighter, but never tells these families that they are dealing with a pathological personality.  He will even tell the entire family that they all have equal ownership of the problem.  WRONG.  There will always be turmoil in a family when there is one of these people involved.  What is involved is normal people being manipulated and confused by the irrational behavior of this one family member. 

 

Either Dr Phil  does know about or recognice these disorders, or there are some ethics to announcing publicly that there is a psycholical disorder involved.  (Patient confidentially?)   Or this is beyond the relm of psychology.    At any rate, he never does well when one of these people are involved.  The family members need to understand what they are dealing with so they can stop trying to treat them like normal people.  They need to find ways to effectively deal with them and emotionally distance themselves from these "Toxic" family members. 

 

"Taking Inventory" or asking that someone step up and "Be a hero" in the situation does not resolve these family conflicts when one of the participants is pathologically disfunctional. 

 

Dr Phil needs to "Get Real" about these disorders.   

 

Norman

 

 

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 30, 2007, 7:31 am PST

I am lucky

Quote From: sparlow

I feel it's time for the bride to grow up and consider her husband's feelings.  She will eventually regret the way she is treating his mother and not allowing her to have a relationship with them.  The mother is just as wrong at what she has been doing and it's time she cut the apron strings and allow her son to live his own life.  If both the bride and the mother would do these things they could have a wonderful relationship of enjoying each other.  I dread to think of what it will be like if and when children are brought into this union.

I have a wonderful mother in law, she treats me like a daughter, In my family both my parents got a divorce, and both remarried, my step dad is the best and i love him to death, and my step mom, she is truly the greatest and i love her too, my family is not picture perfect, but i was blessed. I have a husband that treats me great, more awesome than i expected. we have three kids and they are doing great and trea their soon to be spouses great, i am gaining a daughter in law and a son in law, i respect their choices, and i do NOT think they are bad ones either, i feel my kids chose good people to be with for the rest of their life( i hope)

all i have is one at home, she is 17, her pans are going into the military(airforce) and later get married, but not right now.

so there is hope out there for those who try to make it work, being a pain in the rear, only will make you a bitter person and be alone.

Robin C........... in Oklahoma

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
upset
November 30, 2007, 7:51 am PST

please!

Quote From: nnenna

The DIL is not interested in the marriage.  It will definitelt pack ASAP. Don't worry sonny, mammy will be there for you. I have never seen this kind of situation in my life. I have been married for 15 yrs and have a difficult MIL whom I avoid asmuch a s I can, but I still know my kids need their granny.

 

People like DIL are gonna make bad mothers not to talk of bad MIL. Only God knows what happened in her previous relationship! Lucky guy he got away in time. Jay, Shame shame shame on you

 Please! The MIL is taking no responsibility for her actions . She should've changed the minute the Jay introduced Michelle. Jay and Michelle love each other . I can see that from how  Jay supports Michelle and Michelle loves Jay.  She shouldn't have be in this mess if Jane just changed. My idol Britney Spears I appluade her for disowning her own mother when her mother is just as unhinged as Jane.  If Jay and Michelle do have kids they will compromise with Jane FOR THE KIDS ' SAKE!  Jay is an adult now and his feelings should be respected. Michelle too. Jane has made changes yes , but, mothers like Jane should back off and agree her ways kept her from the wedding.  How are you so sure of what of kind of person Michelle is how she will be as a mother? Have you ever met her? Jay and Michelle deserve to be happy and Jane must accept that.  
 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
November 30, 2007, 7:58 am PST

Awesome post

Quote From: freewillstands

For some of you who have  read some of the messages have realize that those who have a jealous MIL cite with the Dil.  Those who refuse to see that the MIL is the jealous monster site with the Mil ... no surprise.  Dr. Phil mention that Jane was jealous and was having a difficulty time letting go of her son.  Read the section in his website guide line in managing in-laws (under (http://drphil.com/articles/article/28/). 

For those of you who have read Dr. Phil's books you know that you have to go through the process of changing your behavior and time is also to be consider.  There is no way anyone going through therapy can change their behavior in less then few months.  Maintaining new behavior requires time, management, and perseverance.  It's sort of an emotional Diet were you are losing the fat called bad behavior. To expect any of the parties involve instant change is ludicrous. To expect them to have control of their sensitive negative emotions (anger, resentment, spite, doubt) is required because through therapy you learn to take ownership of your emotions.
"A primary requirement for any fight is to maintain control. You do not have the license to be childish, abusive or immature. If you have legitimate feelings, you are entitled to give a reasonable voice to those feelings in a constructive way. (That includes not being self-righteous or taking yourself too seriously.)",quoted by Dr. Phil(http://www.drphil.com/articles/article/317).

 You have to earn emotional Creditability with the person you have a conflict.  Good for Jane for going to therapy.  I wish my mil and my own family would consider it.  When Dr. Phil asked Michelle and J what they have done to better the situation, meaning what actions have you been taking to take accountability to show the mil that you are wanting to have her in your life and to resolve the issue (you can read this in relationship rescue heading " fair fighting by having emotional integrity)?.  They respondent that they did not take accountability.  The MIL kept her emotional integrity at that point.  The couple lost their credibility and that does not mean that the bride is spoiled and a bitch and the son a loser.

Dr.Phil then asked them what they required to be able to open up communication they handed a list of 15 things the most important requesting the accountability of the MIL to take ownership of her bad behavior. Jane did not take ownership (lack of credibility, therefore lack of emotional integrity).  In one swoop she blew up her hard work with the therapist.  Lost credibility in honesty. This does not make Jane an evil doer or jealous monster it just made her dishonest. My suggestion to Jane (to be the winner) is to have taken ownership of her childish, abusive or immature past behavior.  In doing so, the line of communication would have been wide open. Boom, love pours out and we would have seen tears of joy and a reunion.
One example of Emotional integrity
"Give or receive input.
Be open to receiving input from your partner(MIL and Dil and son). You have to be willing to test and be tested. You don't have to say everything you're thinking, but everything you do say has to be accurate. If your partner asks you if you're upset, and you are, you have to be willing to say, "Yes." It's important that both partners know they are going to be told the truth."
.....and on,quote from Dr.Phil (www.drphil.com/articles/article/317)


The DIL and son pointed the finger at her and claimed a lack of credibility.  Their win was short lived because they screwed it up by gloating their win.  Dr. Phil called this a lack of graciousness.  He didn't say that Michelle and J are immature, arrogant, and stupid and J a coward.  What that means is that the couple was not having emotional integrity by being humble and instead they choose to be self-righteous and most important did not fight fair by not letting mil to retrieve with dignity.
one example of fighting fair:
"Allow for your partner(MIL) to retreat with dignity.
How an argument ends is crucial. Recognize when an olive branch is being extended to you perhaps in the form of an apology or a joke and give your partner a face-saving way out of the disagreement." quoted on Dr. Phil(http://drphil.com/articles/article/20/).

 

Over all Dr. Phil champion both groups but supporting their good actions and came hard on them in their shortcomings.  Both parties were both lacking emotional integrity and were not fighting fair at one point or another.  What this means is that the Mother in law is not insane and evil. She is just simply having a hard time letting go of her son and does not know yet how to positively react to her emotions and the situation.  Michelle is not a spoil brat,a bitch, arrogant, and immature.  She is not evil,jealous, and disrespectful because she choose to not be meek in defending her case. She is simply stopping the cruelty by retrieving during the conflict and preventing conflict by keeping her MIL away in order not to get hurt.  She does not know how to have a fair fight and does not know how to deal with her pain and situation.  Both groups can learn through therapy.

If you want to name call and use abusive language, I suggest you read books on forgiveness.  Especially books from Dr.Phil so you can learn to forgive yourself in the process.  What you find so offensive in the other person is a measurement how offensive you are inside.  Turn the finger towards you and question yourself.  You will be surprise that at one point or another you did the same thing. Hypocrisy is nasty.  Learn to love yourself more by letting go of the hypocrisy and hate.

 

 

 

 


 

I agree with you & the response from I support you--so much here is very valuable advice, and the backup quotes and locations from DrPhil are great--very helpful Thanks for taking the time to post it!
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 30, 2007, 8:12 am PST

let both sides save their dignity

Quote From: freewillstands

For some of you who have  read some of the messages have realize that those who have a jealous MIL cite with the Dil.  Those who refuse to see that the MIL is the jealous monster site with the Mil ... no surprise.  Dr. Phil mention that Jane was jealous and was having a difficulty time letting go of her son.  Read the section in his website guide line in managing in-laws (under (http://drphil.com/articles/article/28/). 

For those of you who have read Dr. Phil's books you know that you have to go through the process of changing your behavior and time is also to be consider.  There is no way anyone going through therapy can change their behavior in less then few months.  Maintaining new behavior requires time, management, and perseverance.  It's sort of an emotional Diet were you are losing the fat called bad behavior. To expect any of the parties involve instant change is ludicrous. To expect them to have control of their sensitive negative emotions (anger, resentment, spite, doubt) is required because through therapy you learn to take ownership of your emotions.
"A primary requirement for any fight is to maintain control. You do not have the license to be childish, abusive or immature. If you have legitimate feelings, you are entitled to give a reasonable voice to those feelings in a constructive way. (That includes not being self-righteous or taking yourself too seriously.)",quoted by Dr. Phil(http://www.drphil.com/articles/article/317).

 You have to earn emotional Creditability with the person you have a conflict.  Good for Jane for going to therapy.  I wish my mil and my own family would consider it.  When Dr. Phil asked Michelle and J what they have done to better the situation, meaning what actions have you been taking to take accountability to show the mil that you are wanting to have her in your life and to resolve the issue (you can read this in relationship rescue heading " fair fighting by having emotional integrity)?.  They respondent that they did not take accountability.  The MIL kept her emotional integrity at that point.  The couple lost their credibility and that does not mean that the bride is spoiled and a bitch and the son a loser.

Dr.Phil then asked them what they required to be able to open up communication they handed a list of 15 things the most important requesting the accountability of the MIL to take ownership of her bad behavior. Jane did not take ownership (lack of credibility, therefore lack of emotional integrity).  In one swoop she blew up her hard work with the therapist.  Lost credibility in honesty. This does not make Jane an evil doer or jealous monster it just made her dishonest. My suggestion to Jane (to be the winner) is to have taken ownership of her childish, abusive or immature past behavior.  In doing so, the line of communication would have been wide open. Boom, love pours out and we would have seen tears of joy and a reunion.
One example of Emotional integrity
"Give or receive input.
Be open to receiving input from your partner(MIL and Dil and son). You have to be willing to test and be tested. You don't have to say everything you're thinking, but everything you do say has to be accurate. If your partner asks you if you're upset, and you are, you have to be willing to say, "Yes." It's important that both partners know they are going to be told the truth."
.....and on,quote from Dr.Phil (www.drphil.com/articles/article/317)


The DIL and son pointed the finger at her and claimed a lack of credibility.  Their win was short lived because they screwed it up by gloating their win.  Dr. Phil called this a lack of graciousness.  He didn't say that Michelle and J are immature, arrogant, and stupid and J a coward.  What that means is that the couple was not having emotional integrity by being humble and instead they choose to be self-righteous and most important did not fight fair by not letting mil to retrieve with dignity.
one example of fighting fair:
"Allow for your partner(MIL) to retreat with dignity.
How an argument ends is crucial. Recognize when an olive branch is being extended to you perhaps in the form of an apology or a joke and give your partner a face-saving way out of the disagreement." quoted on Dr. Phil(http://drphil.com/articles/article/20/).

 

Over all Dr. Phil champion both groups but supporting their good actions and came hard on them in their shortcomings.  Both parties were both lacking emotional integrity and were not fighting fair at one point or another.  What this means is that the Mother in law is not insane and evil. She is just simply having a hard time letting go of her son and does not know yet how to positively react to her emotions and the situation.  Michelle is not a spoil brat,a bitch, arrogant, and immature.  She is not evil,jealous, and disrespectful because she choose to not be meek in defending her case. She is simply stopping the cruelty by retrieving during the conflict and preventing conflict by keeping her MIL away in order not to get hurt.  She does not know how to have a fair fight and does not know how to deal with her pain and situation.  Both groups can learn through therapy.

If you want to name call and use abusive language, I suggest you read books on forgiveness.  Especially books from Dr.Phil so you can learn to forgive yourself in the process.  What you find so offensive in the other person is a measurement how offensive you are inside.  Turn the finger towards you and question yourself.  You will be surprise that at one point or another you did the same thing. Hypocrisy is nasty.  Learn to love yourself more by letting go of the hypocrisy and hate.

 

 

 

 


 

I thought what you said and how you put it was great. Really clear and not mean or nasty to either side. I could not agree more with you. Although the mil ( as I said in previous posts) was maninpulative, jealous and bitter..............it doesn't mean she is that way. She came across that way because of fear. She is a single parent of her only son and scared of what this marriage means. She is clinging so hard because fear is causing her to do that. She sees Michelle as the enemy because she has come along and the son loves her and wants a independent life....which the mil hears as i do not need you anymore. That is so far from the truth................but she needs to figure that out on her own. ( not allowing her to the wedding was harsh and sad, but unfortunately there may not have been another way at that point for them)

 

The dil Michelle came off as clingy, hard headed, abrasive, controlling and lacking empathy..........it does not mean she is that way. She sees the mil as trying to prevent her new life........................she needs to figure out that the mil only has power if it is given to her. 

The mil has to achknowledge what she did and let Jay's other family members know he is not evil and lying. And his new wife is not evil..........they need to step back look at the past without dragging it full force into their future.

 

Also I may mention to everyone reading this the "list" of 15 things that people hated. MY husband and I  have a written guideline with my mil. It does list things for her not to do................but mostly it is a guideline to ensure mutual respect and love on both sides. The guidelines is actually a common thing suggested by therapists when a relationship has gone so far off course and there is a desire to get it back on track. With guidelines you can stop focusing on what not to do when together, because it is in writting so everyone is aware..................and start concentrating on rebuilding a relationship......eventually the " guidelines" go away

but they served their purpose. I think many people misunderstood the guidelines and found them offensive. I do understand that when you first hear of them but my husband and I found them extrememly helpful and so did my mil once she stopped feeling offended and like we were treating her as a child. It was not our intent. I honestly believe without the written guidelines we couldn't have moved past things as well as we did..........................once written you can stop dwelling on them.  

 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
November 30, 2007, 8:13 am PST

Another really good post

Quote From: lighthouseguy

I'm one that finds considerable fault on all sides here, but I admit to being baffled by those who only look to one being at fault for everything.

1. I totally agree that MIL is nearly impossible to deal with, is an actress, has probably started this whole mess (although Jay and Michelle have refused to ever say what it was), and is very insincere with politician-like apologies that no one could take seriously.  I will also say, and have said in an earlier post, that my own mom makes this one look like a cake walk.  I mean that seriously.  My own mom got her sons to fight at our father's funeral preparations.  That was her idea of entertainment.  I think I know what kind of mom this MIL is on this show and I am not fooled or mislead by her rather phony attempts to make things right with her son and DIL.  She vaguely apologies while admitting nothing.  That is like rubbing salt in an open wound.  We all want our hurts and pains acknowledge and Michelle and Jay are absolutely right to demand that of this MIL as she still refuses acknowledge much of her fault in this mess.

2. Michelle's behavior is nothing to brag about or "applaud" as you stated.  Her myspace directed at her MIL (whom she invited to read it) was completely inappropriate and immature (are we in high school here?) and she actually admitted to initiating much of the contact with the mom even though she tells the mom not to contact them.  Why?  For the drama that follows.  She is a self-centered little drama queen (send me flowers and I'll get a restraining order on you and then I have 15 things you need to do before I lift that).  If you are going to focus on what Dr. Phil said to the MIL, then also consider what he said to the DIL you want to "applaud" so much.  He told her that nothing the MIL could have done can rationalize or defend her conduct and that she lacks humility and graciousness for which she rolled her eyes for like the upteenth time.  I was personally most appauled at her comment, said with a wicked smile, that "you will have nothing to do with our future children."  Good grief, the kids aren't even born yet and Michelle already plans to use them as weapons.  I totally understand Dr. Phil's comment at her being unable to justify her behavior regardless of what the MIL may or may not have done.

3. Jay, who could be the peacemaker in all this, literally sits on his hands.  He never told his wife to calm down, watch her tone, told her "I'll handle my mom," or anything when speaking to this mother.  That is still his mother and although her conduct is rather inexcusable two wrongs never make a right (well, she spoke disrespectfully to my wife, so she deserves it back --well, isn't that mature).  He can maintain a separate relationship with his mother and keep the two women separate from each other, but, being pushed by his wife, is making a choice to cut one out and it doesn't have to be that way.  My own wonderful wife who never hurt my mother can't be in the same room as my evil, vicious, manipulative mother, but I still have some kind of relationship with her and she still sees her grandkids.  I just don't force (or allow) these two important women in my life an opportunity to hurt each other.  I side with my wife, that's the right thing to do, but also don't disrespect my mom (although she actually deserves it) either.  I also don't use my childred as pawns in this dispute between my mother and my wife.

In addition, Jay has dumped this whole thing in his wife's lap because he can't deal with it (or at least appears not to be able to).  Did you notice how ALL the contact between the women don't involve him?  Michelle does all the calling and emailing (and the myspace crap).  Michelle admitted this.  There is no distortion of facts her.  Jay acts like he's "out of it, it's between them."  That is BS.  It's his mother, therefore, his problem to handle!  He continues to not handle it and typically says how he "agrees" with his wife (as if she has made the decisions).  That is why so many on here keep crying about how he isn't acting like a real man and appears to be manipulated by his wife.  She truly does appear to be handling everything and he just sits there in agreement.  All I can add to that is that it's a good thing his mother didn't keep a score card like he and Michelle do and then give him a 15 item list of what he has to do to regain her love.  Imagine if every mother did that!

********************************************************************************************************************

See, there is plenty of blame to go around.  Not everyone who sees Jay and Michelle as the problem are a part of the MIL's posse, or are the MIL in disguise here, or are suckers for "buying" Jane's "act."  What an outrageously silly claim that hurts your points, not add to them.  In addition, one can't say the same about you either and those that agree with you.  I doubt you are Michelle in disguise or a part of her posse or just a fool for "buying" into Michelle and Jay's "act."  We are just people on here with opinions, but all sides need the same fair analysis.  Focusing on one ("just go back and read some of the things that Jane said!" and "Even DR. PHIL said to Jane, . . .") and ignoring the other side doesn't help or add credibility to an argument.  In debate that is called "begging the question."  If one focuses on only one side then people will naturally feel like they are being begged to ask questions about the other side.  In the end, it makes your side look weak as if you are afraid to admit or give credit to the other side as having any points.

Sorry, I see nothing here for you and others in agreement with you to "applaud" regarding Jay and Michelle's conduct.  They have a major role in how this whole situation got "ran off into the ditch" as Dr. Phil would say.  I, too, would have banned this mother from the wedding if she was so determined to ruin it.  Only those in support of the marriage should be present, but it would be a hurtful and difficult decision and I would explore all possibilities other than banning that might work.  I don't believe for one second it was a decision anyone should applaud, praise, or pat someone on the back for as it was an ugly decision (even if it was one they were forced to make).  It may have been necessary, and, again, I may have done it as well, but Jay and Michelle are gloating over it as some great victory.  If it is to be considered any kind of victory (and it can be) it shouldn't be celebrated or praised. Heck, even Lincoln knew better than to praise the victory at Gettysburg even though it was a victory that turned the tide of the war and perserved the Union because he understood that many lives were lost that day on both sides.  Some victories should be handled with humility and graciousness and that's even when the losers might not really deserve it.  That's taking the high road in Dr. Phil's world.
This post, and your first one, along with freewillstands post have such great advice and resource material--I sincerely hope these 2 families are reading these and choose to follow them. Taking a side is not helpful--everyone should be on the side of each relationship and do whatever is necessary to nurture a good relationship with each other. I'm learning quite abit from some of these posts and responses--thanks everyone for your time and efforts. I also love lighthouses. And, I thoroughly enjoyed several of Charles Swindoll's books--more material that could really help these two families!
 
User Mood
Weird

Message Emote
blank
November 30, 2007, 8:20 am PST

11/27 Banned from the Wedding, Part 2

Quote From: cmw1030

I loved this posting (you are a terrific writer), thank you for your perspective as a son and  husband (with a tough cookie for a mother) and for speaking to this son man-to-man!  I am almost in complete agreement with you (I went a bit easier on the mother) but your read on Michelle and the son is 100% right on.

 

I mean really, the list of 15 things; HELLO - not having her to the wedding of her only son and the disrepectful myspace posting zeros out your 15 requirements- ok sonny boy, you're even and why aren't you apologizing  to HER for that?!  What killed me was how many times the mother ate the humble pie and apologized up, down and sideways, and it still wasn't  "acceptable" to either of them.  Come on, if you're not going to accept your mothers apologies on national tv, then do you really think they will off camera?! - NOT   That tells me that they do not truly want to resolve this issue and Michelle is very satisfied and content with how things stand, she got her way.

 

"Nuff ranting.  Thanks for your input, well worth reading:)

 

Obviously you missed the point of the list..  It was created to help the husband and wife set boundaries for future interactions.  Also, you cannot be the judge of what has hurt anyone's feelings in this scenario.  In your opinion, it may seem horrible that she was not invited to the wedding, but we are all unaware of the past experiences that brought Jay and Michelle to that decision.  If you are to say they were wrong, then you are telling them their feelings are not valid. Which in turn, is wrong on YOUR part. Do you follow?

 

Also, you missed the point with the apologies. Jay and Michelle accepted the apologies, but telling someone, "I am sorry for whatever you FEEL I did" is not a true apology. The couple wants their mother to own up to her wrong doings before they can move on. Which makes sense to me. Why should they try to make amends when she cannot or WILL not admit to what she has done already?

 

In this situation, I do not think Michelle acted very gracefully, but what is done, is done. Jay is obviously tired of his mother's manipulative antics and stands next to his wife, which is in fact the HONORABLE thing to do; and Jane, well she is is a piece of work but I hope that there is some truth to her claim that she is trying to move past this all.  Far be it for me to judge, but shouldn't the adult (in this case Jane) be the one to make amends? Even if that means eating **it and admitting to things you may or may not have done in order to move along???  Whether you agree or not, it seems as though that is all Jay and Michelle want.

 

 

 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
angry
November 30, 2007, 8:21 am PST

shame on you!!

Shame on these KIDS!! Loose a parent[s]......see how that feels!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
 
User Mood
Good

Message Emote
blank
November 30, 2007, 8:24 am PST

I'm curious about this too

Quote From: normanohio

 

Many people have expressed disappointment with the way Dr Phil handled this show. 

 

There is a pattern.  There have been several shows this year where one of the family members is unyielding, controlling, and manipulative.  These people exhibit either Borderline personality Disorder or the more severe Narcissistic  Personality Disorder.   Dr. Phil never recognizes these people as the major cause of ongoing turmoil in these families.  He may call the person a "Drama Queen"  or Toxic, or a Right Fighter, but never tells these families that they are dealing with a pathological personality.  He will even tell the entire family that they all have equal ownership of the problem.  WRONG.  There will always be turmoil in a family when there is one of these people involved.  What is involved is normal people being manipulated and confused by the irrational behavior of this one family member. 

 

Either Dr Phil  does know about or recognice these disorders, or there are some ethics to announcing publicly that there is a psycholical disorder involved.  (Patient confidentially?)   Or this is beyond the relm of psychology.    At any rate, he never does well when one of these people are involved.  The family members need to understand what they are dealing with so they can stop trying to treat them like normal people.  They need to find ways to effectively deal with them and emotionally distance themselves from these "Toxic" family members. 

 

"Taking Inventory" or asking that someone step up and "Be a hero" in the situation does not resolve these family conflicts when one of the participants is pathologically disfunctional. 

 

Dr Phil needs to "Get Real" about these disorders.   

 

Norman

 

 

I don't necessarily think he mishandled this. I noticed that less than usual background information was presented, something mentioned was intentionally not explained, and there were unanswered questions I kept thinking of. But it may be that DrPhil knows exactly what he's doing and presented the topic--obviously a very common and volatile one--in the best way he could due to extenuating circumstances. We don't know that further advice wasn't given off camera. This may be the only way for him to do the show and accommodate everyone's requests or needs.
 
User Mood
Happy

Message Emote
blank
November 30, 2007, 8:39 am PST

11/27 Banned from the Wedding, Part 2

Quote From: normanohio

 

Many people have expressed disappointment with the way Dr Phil handled this show. 

 

There is a pattern.  There have been several shows this year where one of the family members is unyielding, controlling, and manipulative.  These people exhibit either Borderline personality Disorder or the more severe Narcissistic  Personality Disorder.   Dr. Phil never recognizes these people as the major cause of ongoing turmoil in these families.  He may call the person a "Drama Queen"  or Toxic, or a Right Fighter, but never tells these families that they are dealing with a pathological personality.  He will even tell the entire family that they all have equal ownership of the problem.  WRONG.  There will always be turmoil in a family when there is one of these people involved.  What is involved is normal people being manipulated and confused by the irrational behavior of this one family member. 

 

Either Dr Phil  does know about or recognice these disorders, or there are some ethics to announcing publicly that there is a psycholical disorder involved.  (Patient confidentially?)   Or this is beyond the relm of psychology.    At any rate, he never does well when one of these people are involved.  The family members need to understand what they are dealing with so they can stop trying to treat them like normal people.  They need to find ways to effectively deal with them and emotionally distance themselves from these "Toxic" family members. 

 

"Taking Inventory" or asking that someone step up and "Be a hero" in the situation does not resolve these family conflicts when one of the participants is pathologically disfunctional. 

 

Dr Phil needs to "Get Real" about these disorders.   

 

Norman

 

 

Yes, these "types" of people sure give Dr. Phil a run for his money!

 

Dr. Phil normally calls it like it is and really has a handle on the situation, but not with these guests with BPD or NPD.  I would hate to think that he doesn't handle it properly because it is good for the ratings of his show.  After all, look at the number of postings on this message board!

 

I hope this family can get some REAL help, but that will come only when they really want it.  I don't think they are to that point yet.

 
First | Prev | 131 | 132 | 133 | 134 | 135 | 136 | 137 | 138 | 139 | 140 | Next | Last